Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Lucky
Aug 15, 2014 13:55:56 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2014 13:55:56 GMT -5
I just noticed a goof on that episode, if you look when Lucky grabs the rabbit's foot, the Horseshoe is gone like in the remainder of the episode but once the rabbit kicks him, look at his back the Horseshoe appeared on his back, but once he's in Nanny's garden, it disappears.
|
|
|
Lucky
Aug 15, 2014 15:47:38 GMT -5
Post by Two-Tone on Aug 15, 2014 15:47:38 GMT -5
I remember that goof, then again the series had a lot of them involving ear colors and spot colors
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Lucky
Aug 15, 2014 15:48:55 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2014 15:48:55 GMT -5
Yep, they did.
|
|
|
Lucky
Aug 16, 2014 1:21:16 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Belchic on Aug 16, 2014 1:21:16 GMT -5
I remember that goof, then again the series had a lot of them involving ear colors and spot colors Not to mention collar colors.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Lucky
Aug 16, 2014 1:27:16 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2014 1:27:16 GMT -5
And the disappearance of Cadpig's collar in one of the episodes when she had her back turned toward the viewer.
|
|
|
Lucky
Aug 19, 2014 9:51:21 GMT -5
Post by babclayman on Aug 19, 2014 9:51:21 GMT -5
Well, to be fair, when you need to animated about "One Hundred And One Dalmatians", some minor ear or collar issues can be forgivable, can't they?
Although, this is a thread on Lucky, isn't it? I do wonder though, Whilst the; "Live Action" one confirms that the Pup that Roger saves is Lucky, is he still the one who needs to be revived in the; "Animated" Version of in the; "101 Dalmatians The Series" Continuity? Or is Cadpig the one needing revival, like in; "The Novel"?
I guess since Lucky inherites most of Cadpig's traits in the "Animated" Film, most likely, and some books confirm it to be Lucky (like in; "My Side Of The Story"), but what about Cadpig in the "101 Dalmatians The Series" Continuity?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Lucky
Aug 19, 2014 13:10:04 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2014 13:10:04 GMT -5
I don't know, the way I see it, the people who made the show kind of want people to use their imagination for this kind of stuff, I looked it up and it has a continuity error, in other words it's iffy on what Movie despite the Movie pups Wizzer, Dipstick and Two-Tone's appearance and the mention of Penny, Fidget and Jewel.
The look of Patch is from the book since he has his rope around his neck instead of a collar, so I'm going to say that it's up to the viewer.
|
|
|
Lucky
Aug 19, 2014 13:48:29 GMT -5
Post by babclayman on Aug 19, 2014 13:48:29 GMT -5
I find the Continuity to be a bit of a Mixture; Lucky recalls being covered in Soot in; "Home Is Where The Bark Is", along with having plenty of characters from the "Animated" Films, The Dearly Farm is located next to Villa Devil too, and they do state someone named; Smedley owns it before the Dearly's (And it was a Smedley Farm in the 'Animated' Film). But Roger & Anita's occupations are that of the; "Live Action" Films.
All Disney Adaptations are considered Canon, despite various Continuities.
I guess since Lucky is the Pup who is revived in both 'Animated' & 'Live Action' Films, Lucky may be the one Revived in; "101 Dalmatians The Series" Continuity too. That possible?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Lucky
Aug 19, 2014 14:34:06 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2014 14:34:06 GMT -5
It's possible.
|
|
|
Lucky
Aug 19, 2014 17:24:11 GMT -5
Post by Two-Tone on Aug 19, 2014 17:24:11 GMT -5
I agree, I too feel Lucky was the one Roger revived in the series canon.
|
|
|
Lucky
Mar 27, 2015 7:22:31 GMT -5
Post by Richie on Mar 27, 2015 7:22:31 GMT -5
Lucky, is definitely one of my favorite characters in the movie and on the show. He's in the top ten of my favorite Disney characters of all time.
|
|
|
Lucky
Dec 30, 2015 15:07:07 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Alexy Caceres on Dec 30, 2015 15:07:07 GMT -5
I like lucky because he cute and spot is always a chicken
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Lucky
May 25, 2016 20:44:03 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2016 20:44:03 GMT -5
A lot of people offsite seem to dislike Lucky, and I have to agree he has his selfish moments and can be a jerk. But he's also a good leader, tries to help people when he can and can actually be a really nice guy. He's honestly pretty well rounded as a character, having both good qualities and character flaws. Plus he's just cute.
|
|
|
Lucky
May 25, 2016 20:53:39 GMT -5
Post by babclayman on May 25, 2016 20:53:39 GMT -5
I haven' hear of any Pup take issue, with Lucky.
As you claim though, we al have times where we can seem a bit...awkward, but that's what helps make one a good dimensional being.
Lucky also shows that he shall do the right thing, when he hears the call for it.
I am also looking at a small excpt of the Show Bible for; "101 Dalmatians The Series", and they explain Lucky is kind of like a Dalmatian Tom Sawyer, You Know, what I mean, Pups? ;3
|
|
|
Lucky
Sept 28, 2017 15:13:59 GMT -5
Post by Two-Tone on Sept 28, 2017 15:13:59 GMT -5
yup we're still going
|
|