|
Post by Belchic on Oct 2, 2015 23:52:24 GMT -5
Hey guys, Belchic here with another commentary.
This is my second attempt at making a commentary using Flo's strategy: searching for rants on topics that intrigue me. I've been looking for a rant on 101 Dalmatians, and I couldn't find very many other than the ones I made back in 2012. However, I did manage to find this user by the name of Andrew Walbyoff, who made a rant about the Blu-Ray release of 101 Dalmatians. Now, this guy lives in the UK (if his accent isn't a giveaway), so naturally, he is talking about the version from 2012 that was only released in the UK. This person shows a perfect example of how people rant about the smallest things that are not worth getting so upset about. There are also some other issues I have with the video, and I'll point them out as I do the commentary. So without further ado...you tell 'em, Zuma!
*plays clip from PAW Patrol* Zuma: Let's dive in!
0:15 - We are not really interested in what you're wearing. We can tell that is Mickey Mouse. You are not a preschooler. Also, you don't need to get up so close to the camera like that. It's kind of disturbing.
0:51 - Why are you shaking so much? Are you on medication? Or did you drink a lot of coffee before you did this video? Or are you just nervous? Maybe if I watched more of your videos, I might know, but seeing you shake like that makes me a little nervous.
1:09 - That's because it's not the Diamond Edition. It's just a bare bones Blu-Ray of the Platinum Edition.
1:45 - I wouldn't know too much about that since I don't live in the UK, but I think over here in the US, the Platinum Edition DVD of 101 Dalmatians sold very well.
2:07 - To be fair, this video was posted on YouTube a year before the Diamond Edition Blu Ray was released; I'll be talking about that later.
2:14 - Bok art? I think you mean box art.
2:27 - And to think that I was disappointed that the US didn't get this.
2:47 - First of all, Blu-Rays do not have artwork on them. That's just the way they are designed. Second, Disney is not from Paris. Where the hell did you get that from?
3:17 - Aren't cute and adorable basically the same thing? I think that puppy is Lucky. Makes me a little jealous that my DVD copy didn't come with one of those, but I've got plenty of Dalmatian plushies already, and not to mention all the PAW Patrol pups, so that's good enough for me.
3:59 - I could agree with you there. Though I'm sure that box set you have is only available in the UK. Maybe babclayman can tell me about it.
4:21 - If you really love the movie, then it seems the more likely to get the Blu-Ray. Though I will somewhat agree that it is kind of pointless if you already have the DVD, but it's always best to have the movies you love the most in the best quality.
4:33 - I personally think that's an awesome box set. Also, 101 Dalmatians is more than just pretty good. I could say that for Patch's London Adventure, but the original is a masterpiece.
4:45 - I have that DVD copy of 101 Dalmatians II that you're holding right now.
5:00 - That's what the US got too.
5:16 - Again, you're complaining about the artwork. Those could be put onto a DVD. Blu-Rays don't do that because...I guess because it'll mess them up and they won't play properly, but don't quote me on that.
5:43 - Really? You are classifying an inanimate object in the film as a character? Surely you jest.
5:51 - You really have some obsession problems with double-decker busses.
6:12 - I told you, Blu-Rays don't have artwork on them. That's just the way they are. I don't know why exactly, but I'm sure somebody knows.
6:29 - Well, we did get the Diamond Edition Blu-Ray eventually, and I think it's worth the money!
7:01 - Again, you're throwing a fit over it not having artwork! That's not a big deal! My God, this guy is just as bad as Aknotholeresident!
7:30 - I told you: it's made to look like that! That's the way Blu-Rays are supposed to be! Just be thankful they at least put the movie's logo on the disc so you'd know what it is! Shouldn't you care more about the material on the Blu-Ray rather than the artwork on the disc? Oh, by the way, I can see the reflection of your computer screen on the case.
*skips to 8:44*
9:10 - Yes, we've seen it a dozen times already. You don't have to keep showing it to us with those shaking hands of yours.
9:56 - I was a little let down by the bonus features on the DVD myself, but they were still worthwhile.
10:26 - This video is 12 minutes and 53 seconds! It's far from what I would call a "mini rant"!
10:42 - I'm sure they'll release it eventually. Just be patient.
10:54 - Uhh...I have mixed emotions about that last statement.
11:03 - Okay. Everyone has their own opinions. Nothing wrong with that.
11:46 - Yeah, and that's probably why the TV series will never get a DVD release because Disney doesn't think they'll make money off of it, plus it's a show that not many people know about other than Sparky's message board and a small demographic on DeviantArt.
And I'm going to end the video right here because he then goes off rambling about off-topic stuff and gets himself cut off at the end.
Well, overall, Andrew made a few good points about how one could be disappointed over the Blu-Ray, but he kept complaining about the smallest things like the disc not having artwork on it. It's just like when the AVGN complains about the game cartridges not having end labels; it's not that big a deal. He also wasn't very clear sometimes, and the constant shaking he was doing made me wonder what was up with him. On the bright side, at least he wasn't going all manchild on us like Aknotholeresident or that guy who made the rant about the Google logo. Still, it is annoying that people have to rant about the silliest things.
Anyway, this is Belchic signing off.
|
|
|
Post by Flowgli on Oct 28, 2015 23:27:09 GMT -5
Hi, guys. Here I am with another commentary. For this commentary, I'm gonna do something very different. The video I'm gonna be commentating on is a clip of an unsold pilot instead of a video that was put together by a member on YouTube. This pilot is for a game show called Idiot Quest, and it has nothing to do with the GSN original called Idiotest. This unsold pilot was made back in 2007, packaged by MTV Productions, and hosted by Ryan Stout. After reading an article on this pilot and watching this clip, I can see why this pilot was never sold. The gameplay is just plain ridiculous, and it's just a really stupid idea for a game show altogether. This is the only video of this pilot that can be found on the Internet. So, let's take a look at how the game in this pilot works and see how bad it is.
0:30 - So, judging by the theme song and the phrases shown in the intro, the show is looking for the dumbest people to be contestants. That's not a good move.
0:48 - Now, you can see the problem with this show right there. Host Ryan Stout just said that contestants can win money by giving wrong answers to questions. What game show, past or present, that actually has a series has contestants win money for wrong answers instead of right answers? None whatsoever. And no game show that will sell in the future will ever have contestants win money for wrong answers instead of right answers. It'll sound just like the producers are just giving money away instead of making contestants earn it.
0:52 - That does sound like what I was thinking, but you shouldn't say "I know what you're thinking". I really don't like it when people say to someone "I know what you're thinking", because they actually don't know what other people are thinking, so don't say that. Now, about contestants giving wrong answers on purpose, that actually would ruin the game if the object is to give wrong answers to questions instead of right answers, because then, every contestant would want to just lie about what they know or don't know by giving a wrong answer on purpose each time they're asked a question that they do know the correct answer to.
1:02 - That's actually a good move. Having contestants hooked to lie detectors is a good move, because that can help tell if a contestant giving a wrong answer is honest or dishonest about what they know or don't know. I guess you guys running the show are really not idiots, after all.
1:46 - I actually heard that there are cars that cost less than $5,000, but those are used cars. The price of a car depends on what kind of car it is, and we never hear what kind of car Ty wanted to buy.
1:48 - Okay, now, I feel like an idiot for jumping in too soon with that last point I made. It sounded right there that Ty said "SV for me!", meaning that the kind of car she wanted to buy is an SV, meaning that she wanted to buy a Lamborghini, which is normally valued at way more than $5,000.
2:19 - Well, after hearing everything that these three contestants had to say, I will say that you guys running this show actually did a very good job at choosing really stupid people to play the game. I'm sure they'd score a lot of money by giving a lot of wrong answers and not worry about how much they know or don't know.
2:53 - Yeah, you all heard Ryan. If you want to win cash on Idiot Quest, don't just be stupid; be honestly stupid! Lie about how stupid you are, and you'll end up with no money! Man, does all that sound stupid, I mean, really. Now, let's watch the round and see how they tackle the questions that are to be asked to them.
3:17 - I thought Sarah's answer was a lie, to be honest. It really did sound to me as if she was faking being stupid when she gave a state as an answer on a question in which she was asked for a city. I'm surprised that her answer was not a lie.
3:48 - Yeah, that's what you should've done on the first question. That's asking the guy monitoring the lie detectors if a contestant who gave a wrong answer is either being honest or lying. You should do that each time a contestant gives a wrong answer, but you didn't.
4:17 - I myself think it wouldn't be okay to think about sex when a subject like grandmothers is being brought up. Thankfully, "sex" in the word "sexagenarian" means something different.
4:39 - IQT? Well, that does sound kinda dumb to me, but if that's what you wanna refer to your assistant on this show as, and you think that's the only name that works, then fine.
5:17 - Yeah, Sarah, don't feel upset about how wrong you are on that question, because that's what the game is all about; it's about giving wrong answers to questions and doing it honestly, and you did exactly just that, to my surprise. Also, the way IQT sung the first lyrics to "The Star-Spangled Banner" doesn't sound that good.
5:36 - Oh, my God! A question about Lake Titicaca is being asked on this show?! Man, I have a feeling that Ty's answer is going to sound dirty! I have been getting dirty thoughts on Lake Titicaca everytime I hear that name since I first heard it on Animaniacs!
*A clip of Animaniacs is played.* Yakko: *blows a kiss* G'night, everybody!
Oh, no, you don't, Yakko! This video isn't over yet. we still have approximately two-and-a-fourth minutes left in the video. Besides, I wanna hear Ty's answer on this question. It should be interesting.
5:45 - Cow boobs? Okay, not counting those that are anthropomorphized on Wild West C.O.W.-Boys Of Moo Mesa--since those are obviously not real--what cow has boobs? Oh, wait! That's right! I'm talking to a stupid person who is a contestant on Idiot Quest! And by "cow boobs", I'm guessing that she meant a cow's udder, judging by that hand gesture she made.
6:11 - The perfect dumb answer for anyone on this show, no matter how smart or dumb they honestly are, to give on a question about currency!
6:46 - Sucking, which is what the contestants on this show are doing; they're sucking at answering questions, which is a good thing here, and they're really good at sucking at answering questions so far, as no one has gotten a question right.
7:23 - Until now. Ty just got a question about Kleenex tissues right, which is a question that anyone on this show, no matter how smart or dumb they honestly are, can easily get right. And because Ty was honest on that question, her cash score stays the way it is. And to the audience, there's no clapping for a right answer! Remember, this is Idiot Quest, a game where contestants win money by honestly getting questions wrong!
7:50 - And that's the end of the round. The rest of the game hasn't been uploaded, but I'll explain how it works according to its article on U.S. Game Shows Wiki. Round two is played the same way as round one, except it's played by three male contestants instead of female contestants, and whoever is in the lead at the end of that round advances to the Jackpot Round, where he will play against the winner of round one--in this case, it's Sarah--for $5,000. The Jackpot Round was never explained in full detail; it only said that the two winners from the previous two rounds face off in this round. That's it.
In conclusion, this is a really bad pilot. I'm not surprised that this pilot never sold. Seeing that the object of the game is to get questions wrong and be honest about how stupid one is makes me wonder if the contestants on this failed pilot were really that stupid or the whole thing was really an act. Well, Idiot Quest may not have sold, but seven years later, GSN has a game show that has the word "idiot" in its title and gameplay that is a lot better. That game show is Idiotest, and so far, it has two seasons. On Idiotest, teams of two use touchscreens to answer brain teaser questions as fast as they can, and they score money by getting questions right! So, if you want to make a game show made for really stupid people or "idiots", then how about you make it with questions that can easily be answered correctly by children in elementary school, have it played by young adults, and have the contestants answer the questions correctly to win? That would make a better game show than Idiot Quest would. I'm surprised, though, that Robert Q. Seidelman didn't induct this pilot before he stopped making inductions on a regular basis on Game Show Garbage. But because he announced that he'll be making five or six inductions a year from this point on, he can still get this show inducted. He inducted unsold pilots like Cop Out!, Bamboozle, and Monday Night Quarterback. So, why not induct Idiot Quest? That pilot was so bad that it deserves to be inducted.
Now, I know it feels kinda weird doing a commentary on an unsold pilot, but D3ATHCRITIC did the same thing when commentating on the unsold pilot for Battletoads. And who knows? Maybe next time, I'll do a commentary on another unsold pilot if it's bad enough for one. You'll never know what I'll be commentating on next.
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Dec 13, 2015 14:20:51 GMT -5
Hey, guys! It's been a while since I've done a commentary, so I thought I'd do one for you guys.
I've seen a lot of people on YouTube who act like they don't know anything, but they should considering how old they are. People who are over 18 who act as if they are living on earth for the first time, or they think their viewers are idiots. If you've watched my other commentaries, I'm sure you're familiar with Sarah, the girl who has that ToyReviewsForYou channel. I already did commentaries on three of her videos, and I don't plan to do anymore. However, this person falls under the same category as Sarah. This user goes by the name of DiaryOfASuperfluousWoman. Here she does a reading of the children's book, "Patrick's Dinosaurs", and she doesn't do a very good job of it. I'll show you exactly why. So without further ado...
*plays clip from "PAW Patrol"* Zuma: Let's dive in!
0:06 - Yes, we really need to see you spinning the camera away from you like that. Though, I guess kudos to you for being one of the few people on YouTube who is using an actual camcorder for this video, since the videos they record come in much better quality. Most people use webcams or their phones. Anyway, proceed.
0:15 - You claim this to be your "5 minutes of fun", yet the video is twice that long. Something tells me you didn't plan that out very well.
0:24 - Like we really want to know that. I hope you spend your everyday life doing something constructive.
0:44 - Yes, we can see the pictures. They look nice, despite the lack of color in the dinosaurs. Still, you don't need to tell us to look at the pictures.
1:11 - It's not really that amazing. History is history.
1:30 - "Brun-Toss-a-Riss"? I think you mean "Brontosaurus".
1:37 - Um...how old are you exactly?
1:56 - Again, we didn't need to see that.
2:10 - Makes me wonder how old Patrick is supposed to be.
2:18 - You must know nothing about dinosaurs considering you don't even know how to pronounce their names.
2:29 - It's "Brontosaurus"! I knew how to pronounce that when I was still in diapers! You look like you're in college, so I would think you would be old enough to know better.
2:43 - I see that part wasn't in the book.
3:36 - That said "enormous crocodile" is called a Dynoseucus (sp?) if I'm not mistaken. I wonder why the book doesn't say that.
3:40 - Well, The Monkees shouldn't have anything to do with this book. This isn't about going to see concerts. It's about dinosaurs.
4:10 - And that's pronounced "Diplodocus". Admittingly, I pronounced it that way once.
4:21 - You act as if you never walked the earth before. Diplodocus is actually the longest dinosaur, not the biggest. Though the biggest dinosaur to walk the earth been debatable for a long time.
5:04 - You don't even know how to pronounce "Stegosaurus"? Did you ever learn anything about dinosaurs growing up? Also, why are all the dinosaurs in this book the same color?
5:16 - Did you paint your nails candy corn color?
5:23 - Do I seriously need to make a drinking game out of this?
5:36 - Did you gain an accent for a second there?
5:43 - Finally, you pronounced a dinosaur name correctly!
6:03 - Yeah, we're really interested in those people.
6:18 - *shows Nostalgia Critic clip* NC: ............HA!
6:43 - I wonder why the Triceratops had to wait for the traffic light in the first place.
7:15 - You're easily amused, aren't you?
7:29 - You really need to see "Jurassic Park". It seems to me like you've been living under a rock since the day you were born.
7:51 - Apparently this book takes place around 5 million B.C. then.
7:58 - Cat got your tongue?
8:23 - Then I suggest you do so, judging by your lack of knowledge of dinosaurs, I'm guessing you're probably not doing well in school. It amazes me how much you lack in that knowledge. You must be the only person in the world who never learned about dinosaurs as a kid.
9:02 - Well, if you continue to do this, I suggest you practice reading the books first, and try not to treat your viewers like idiots. K, thanks.
9:15 - Well, if you can't pronounce words correctly, nobody will take you seriously.
9:25 - No sh*t, Sherlock. If kids made it, it would look like crayon drawings you would see on the refrigerator.
9:38 - Yeah, and people nowadays wouldn't have the attention span for that. Besides, that's what audiobooks are for.
10:00 - You're forgetting that people who watch this live in different parts of the world, so weather differs.
10:19 - As if that hair metal head bob wasn't freaky enough!
Well, overall, it just surprises me how this girl acted in this video. I don't know how old she is, but the fact that she mispronounced all those dinosaur names, acted like she's never seen stuff like this before, and treated her viewers like idiots could easily make her an easy subject of joke, much like other infamous YouTube users (whose names will remain anonymous). She seems to have some serious problems. Some of you might be thinking, "Well, maybe she has a disability." If that were the case, then maybe some of you may view me as a douchebag for doing this commentary or something like that. Well, I happen to have a disability; I have Aspergers, but as I was growing up, people still gave me a hard time for every mistake that I made! I am dead serious! That's just how the world works. There are people out there who are going to criticize you and put you down no matter what, and they won't go easy on you. It's sad but true. While we may be taught to accept people for the way they are, others will not have the heart to do it, and they won't care if you have a disability or anything like that. So my advice to DiaryOfASuperfluousWoman: as you continue to make YouTube videos, try to think about your audience before you post. If you're having trouble pronouncing words or have a lack of knowledge in a certain subject, take a break from YouTube and talk to some professionals who can give you guidance. That way, you'll better yourself and gain a better reputation.
That's all I gotta say on the matter. I'll see you guys next time.
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Dec 20, 2015 13:52:19 GMT -5
Hey, guys! Belchic here with another commentary for you all!
I've been going to Disneyland regularly since the day I was born. One thing about Disneyland that I've always been fascinated with are the attractions of the past. One of my favorites is America Sings, an attraction I remember seeing a few times before it closed when I was 3 years old. It is a shame that kids of this generation will never get a chance to see it in person, but thanks to YouTube, we can now see videos of it.
However, this video that I am doing a commentary on is by a user named SecretsofDisneyland, someone who specializes in talking about Disneyland attractions of the past and their history. Though I have a few problems with how this video turned out, so without further ado...
*plays clip from "PAW Patrol"* Zuma: Let's dive in!
0:04 - And of course, by special, she means it's the first and only video of hers where we get to actually hear her voice.
0:19 - Way to go coming off as an attention wh0re.
0:23 - Personally, I would prefer you to use your voice because otherwise, some people may mistake it for a troll video. You know, those videos that only show text, and the only audio we hear is some random heavy metal music that nobody has ever heard of? But whatever rocks your boat.
0:32 - The only people who may not know about it were the ones born after it closed and never met anyone who saw it.
1:10 - *plays clip from AVGN's "Nintendo Power" video* AVGN: This sounds familiar.
1:54 - I do remember that effect. It's a shame it was too dark for any video cameras to pick up. Yeah, none of the videos on YouTube show the flashing stars.
2:12 - You could have shown a picture of the weasel as you were talking about that.
2:22 - Do you keep losing your voice or something?
2:39 - I think it's pronounced "Jeanie".
2:56 - You mispronounced Liza. Didn't you even listen to the songs?
3:05 - You skipped something, but that will come up later in the video.
3:17 - The song is actually called "Down in the Valley".
3:24 - Of course that hound dog is after the geese and before the Swamp Boys.
3:33 - I always thought that song was called "Lay Down My Burden", but I guess it is "Down by the Riverside".
3:49 - You didn't talk about the fox and rabbit on the mine cart.
3:56 - Again with the pronunciation.
4:23 - Really? You couldn't find a photo? Couldn't you just take a screenshot of a YouTube video? It's not that hard.
4:37 - Why are we looking at the finale of that act?
5:27 - And also the geese quartet and Sam and Ollie.
5:46 - That screenshot is of the geese from the Gay 90's segment, not the Modern Times segment. Why are you using that now?
6:02 - Again, finding a photo is not that hard.
6:45 - That song may be an oldie today, but it was a brand new song when the attraction first opened. I'm sure today, they would never get away with using songs like that because they'd have to buy the rights to use it and all.
6:54 - And don't forget about this... *plays clip from "America Sings" Weasel: Goodbye goes the weasel! Hehehehehehe!
7:26 - Okay, other than that last sentence that sounded like it was your opinion, this sounds like you are reading it directly off of Wikipedia.
7:37 - I rest my case.
7:48 - That photo is actually of the Splash Mountain in Tokyo Disneyland.
8:19 - I still rest my case on you reading that off of Wikipedia. Though I won't accuse you of plagiarism because Wikipedia can change anytime. Also, I've noticed you're using a lot of screenshots taken from Yesterland.com. I hope you got permission from the site's owner, Werner Weiss, to use those because I remember reading something on that site saying that you are not allowed to use screenshots from that site without his permission.
8:58 - I don't blame you for not being able to find concept art for Plectu's. It's a shame that show never saw the light of day. As for your comment about Tomorrowland being outdated, I will agree that it's been in need of a huge makeover for over a decade. Of course, by that, I don't mean Star Wars attractions (like it has right now), but something that would feel like the Tomorrowland of the 60's, 70's and 80's. Anything Star Wars related should remain in the upcoming Star Wars Land.
9:02 - Splash Mountain didn't need the animatronics. It was only because of budgeting problems and the fact that nobody was going on America Sings anymore.
9:09 - When?
9:26 - Is that picture taken from my Retrojunk article of this attraction? If it is, I'm not going to get mad at you for using it without my permission (as long as you're not claiming it as your own). I'm actually flattered that you found it and thought it was good enough for you to use in your video.
9:38 - I'm also thankful they kept them for the 2011 reboot of Star Tours.
9:51 - Now it's "I've been looking at the same bags."
9:58 - That still mystifies me to this day knowing that that stork still exists out there somewhere. I'd love to go see it if that's true.
10:04 - And of course, she finishes off with grammatically poor text.
Well, my only critique with this video is if you're going to continue to make videos like this, try not to read stuff off of Wikipedia or any other website. Try to rewrite it into your own words and formulate your own opinions on them. That's how you'll become more popular. Also, you need to work on your editing; I swear you cut yourself off in a lot of places. I suggest you take a look at the "Parks of Forgotten Disney" edition of this attraction to get an idea of what I'm talking about.
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Jan 1, 2016 12:51:29 GMT -5
Happy New Year, everyone! This is Belchic giving you my first commentary of 2016!
You know, recently, I thought I'd try doing a commentary on someone making a rant on a topic I am interested in, since that's how Flo does a lot of her commentaries. I thought at first I would try PAW Patrol. I've already commentated on two PAW Patrol rants, and I thought maybe I'd try commentating on some others since there are several of them, but there is one problem...EVERY SINGLE PAW PATROL RANT ON YOUTUBE IS EXACTLY THE SAME!!! I'm serious! Just do a search for "Paw Patrol rant" and watch each video that comes up in the search results; I guarantee each and every one follows pretty much the exact same script word for word! So with that in mind, I will not commentate on such videos, because why bother commentating on the same video twice?
I tried doing a search for rants on Martha Speaks, I found a few of them, but guess what? THEY'RE ALL THE SAME TOO! One of the rants I found on that topic I swear also did one of those PAW Patrol rants I mentioned earlier. Maybe someday later, I'll commentate on one of those Martha Speaks rants since I find it worthy of a commentary, but for now, I think I found an even better candidate.
This user goes by the name of lotsaspaghettiman. (Yeah, you can probably guess by that name that he is a YouTube Poop fanboy.) Anyway, this guy has some serious problems. In this video, he makes a rant about the Hub's "Pound Puppies", and this video was posted in November 2011, back when the show was still in its first season. This guy is a frigging manchild! He is a fanboy of the 80's Hanna-Barbara "Pound Puppies" cartoon, and he throws a huge ****y fit over what he doesn't like about the Hub's series. This guy angered me so much that I actually screamed at my screen because of what he said! I hate to even say this, but I think this guy is even whinier than AKnotholeResident! Well, this is not going to be pretty, but without further ado...
*plays clip from "PAW Patrol"* Zuma: Let's dive in!
0:22 - Repetition at its finest, folks.
0:25 - Oh, are you going to threaten me? Are you going to reach out and grab me through my computer screen or something?
0:38 - Dude, you're not looking at anybody! You're looking at a freaking webcam! Also, do you honestly think the creators of Pound Puppies are actually going to watch this video and send you a response? Of course not! They would be crazy to take time out of their precious lives to respond to some manchild ****ing and moaning about the show they created.
0:48 - Erm, I don't recall there being any "hip-hop" in the series, unless you count that outfit Lucky wore in the Season 1 finale. Also, calling either version of Pound Puppies a "masterpiece" is a bit of a stretch, don't you think?
0:53 - Hey, if you don't like the show, DON'T WATCH IT! It's that simple!
1:07 - I'll have you know that the newer series has just as much conflict as the original series. Also, the animation used on this show is flash animation, which is a more modern form of animation used on other modern cartoons like "My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic". I admit it's not as good as hand-drawn animation, but at least it's better than CG, right?
1:16 - *facepalm* "My generation was better!" For crying out loud, GROW UP! Everybody has their own opinions on their respective generations, I am sure of it, but you know what? Times have changed! Your generation is over now, and it's never coming back! So you'll just have to deal with what we have now and move on with your d**n life!
1:31 - WHAT??? Don't tell me you actually like that movie! After how much of a sh*tfest the Nostalgia Critic made it out to be, I'm surprised that movie even has fans.
1:40 - I have no idea what you're talking about. Could you explain to me what this "something bigger" thing is that is going on?
1:51 - First of all, like I said, there is NO hip-hop in the series! Second of all, it was made for a more modern generation of kids, not young adults who grew up with the original series. Third of all, that's the animation style they wanted to use for the show; you should at least be grateful the animation improved as the series progressed.
2:00 - They most likely wanted to make this series as a whole new perspective as opposed to the original series. That's not always a bad thing. Lots of franchises have succeeded in doing that.
2:08 - But a minute ago you said that you hated this show, and now you love it? Make up your mind!
2:11 - JESUS! You seriously need therapy! If you spoke that way to someone who is of higher authority than you, they will nail you to the ground like nobody's business! Also, calling "Legend of Big Paw" the best movie ever is pretty much telling people to bite you on the ass; don't come crying to me if people argue with you about that statement and compare it to movies like "Star Wars", "Gone with the Wind", "Citizen Kane", "The Godfather", and I'll even go as far to say "The Dark Knight" and "Avatar".
2:14 - And he cuts himself off just as he starts bawling uncontrollably. Why am I not surprised?
Well, final verdict: This guy is a perfect example of how much of a crybaby manchildren could be. He's also a perfect example of those people who always say, "my generation was better" and throw a huge **** fit over how modern stuff is crap. Some people just don't adapt to change very well. "Pound Puppies" ended its production two years after this video was uploaded, so I hope this guy is happy about that, even though I'm not, though I wonder if the reason they canceled it is because of the responses they got like this. Well, you can't please everybody. My advice to lotsaspaghettiman: I understand you have things that you love and you don't like change, but acting like a 2-year-old over it is not going to make things better! If anything, it'll hurt your reputation on the Internet, and you'll become a subject of joke to many other YouTube users. I'm sure you don't want to become as infamous as ChrisChan, do you? Well, let's hope not.
That's all I gotta say on the matter. This is Belchic signing out.
|
|
|
Post by Flowgli on Jan 5, 2016 11:07:28 GMT -5
I'm here with another commentary. The person I'm gonna be commentating on is a person I commentated on before. That person is Chris-Chan. Now, I know that I said at the end of my other commentary on Chris-Chan that that was the only time here that I would be talking about him or anyone or anything that had anything to do with him, but after seeing some videos in his new YouTube channel called CwcvilleGuardian, I can't help but go back to him and see what he's been up to. Now, as you probably all know, back in 2014, Chris-Chan caused trouble at GameStop by vandalizing a Sonic Boom display and spraying an employee with mace, all because of a color change in Sonic the Hedgehog's arms, which was from tan to blue, and for his actions, he got banned from that place. Well, he tried to get the ban lifted, but failed, for that caused the ban to be expanded from just the store he caused that kind of trouble in to all the GameStop stores in Virginia. He received a letter from a representative of the Corporate Safety and Loss Prevention Team about the expansion of the ban from GameStop, and Chris-Chan made a video in which he reads that letter and complains about the expansion of the ban. This video was uploaded almost exactly a month ago. What does the letter say, and what does Chris have to say about it? Well, let's take a look.
0:02 - Fans? How could you have any fans after the way you have acted? You have done a lot of crazy sh*t in the past, and you've done something really awful that got you into trouble, so I don't know how you could have fans after all that.
0:06 - Who is this "we" that you speak of? You and your mother, Barbara? I hope you don't mean you and your so-called "fans", because they have nothing to do with you in any way, shape, or form.
0:28 - I am sure without a doubt that that letter is real and not some prank. Everyone involved with that letter was being serious about what they were doing. And now, I'll be listening to Chris reading the letter in its entirety, and I will not start commentating again until after he says the next thing that is commentary-worthy. Here's the letter.
3:06 - Okay, Chris is done reading the letter, so I am now back to commentating. Now, Chris, you may be pissed off over being banned from GameStop statewide, but you need to keep in mind that the whole thing was your fault. You did something that got you in serious trouble. You did assault a GameStop employee by spraying him with mace, and for what? Because Sonic's arm color has changed from tan to blue! And you shouldn't have tried to get yourself unbanned from GameStop. That only made things worse for you. It got you banned from GameStop statewide. Judging by what I heard from that letter you just read, you'll never be allowed in GameStop anywhere in Virginia again. Maybe if you haven't done all those things that got you banned from GameStop at all, then you wouldn't even be banned from GameStop in any location in Virginia in the first place, especially the one where you assaulted that employee.
3:28 - No, Chris. You made things worse. They read that letter correctly. They know what you did, and so do you. You just want to make yourself out to be the victim, make them out to be the bad guys and have them feel bad for you, and not take any responsibility for your actions yourself. You're not a victim, and they're not the bad guys. Maybe, from this point on, you'll actually think twice about your actions before you go out in public and do something that would get you in trouble again.
4:00 - GameStop was not being unfair to autistics or LGBT people. I don't know where you got that idea from. And people who are autistic or part of the LGBT community are not going to follow your lead. They're not going to make any protests to GameStop. The ban from GameStop in Virginia does not affect any of them; it only affects you. And you weren't banned because of what kind of person you are; you were banned because of what kind of actions you pulled off.
4:08 - I highly doubt that that's gonna happen.
4:40 - They've banned a lot of other people? Where have you heard this from? Do you have any proof on that? If you do, then you should show it to your viewers in this video. But if you don't, then I'm gonna say that you are a liar. And when they ban people, they will always have a reason for it, just like they have a reason for banning you.
4:56 - There was absolutely nothing that made those people cruel, heartless, soulless, or anything else like that. They're just doing their jobs the best they can, especially keeping employees in GameStop safe from troublemakers like YOU. They're doing this for the safety of their employees and customer base.
5:05 - Why are you bringing Battletoads into this? Aren't you making this video to complain about being banned from every GameStop store in Virginia? But then again, I think you said all that needed to be said about that, so you might as well end the video right here and not waste any time complaining about GameStop not selling any Battletoads stuff.
5:25 - Nobody is going to side with you on something like this, especially after what you've done wrong. And not everybody likes Battletoads, either. I think there are more people who don't like Battletoads than there are people who do like it. Also, from what I've heard about Battletoads games, a game for Xbox One called Rare Replay was released just months ago. Rare Replay is a compilation of thirty games made by Rare and its predecessor called Ultimate Play The Game combined, and two of the games included in that compilation are Battletoads games! One of those Battletoads games included in this compilation is the first installment of the Battletoads franchise that was released on the Nintendo Entertainment System in 1991, while the other game included is Battletoads Arcade, which was released as an arcade game in 1994. Have you ever thought about buying Rare Replay, or maybe an Xbox One, as well, if you don't have one? I think not.
6:39 - Did the GameStop stores really destroy all the games they were unable to sell? Also, about them being asked to donate those games to charity and hospitals and refusing to do so, did that really happen?
7:06 - There was nothing heartless done in something like this. And this was something that happened to only you, not a lot of people. Leave everyone else out of this.
7:23 - What discrimination? There wasn't any! You're talking crap! And people are not going to make any protests on what you've complained about in this video. And if people want to use GameStop online resources, then they have every right to do so. They get to decide on whether or not to use them, not you.
7:56 - Well, in any case, you do sound ridiculous. And the people working at GameStop are not discriminating against Battletoads. And if more people than just you are banned from GameStop, I'd like to hear their names and a little bit about them. If you don't have anything like that to back yourself up, then I'm gonna say that you're lying.
8:07 - Stop saying that the people working at GameStop discriminated against autistics, LGBT people, and Battletoads! THEY'RE NOT!
8:23 - How do you know if the people working in GameStop have destroyed all the unsold games? And these people are NOT being bad, heartless, and soulless! Really, Chris, what is going on in that thick head of yours?
8:55 - Nobody is going to listen to you, Chris! They're not gonna help get you unbanned from all the GameStop stores, and the people who work at GameStop are not being discriminative, either! They're not being unfair to anyone! AT ALL! What they've done to you was done for a reason, and just because they've done that to YOU does NOT mean that they are discriminating against people with certain disorders or certain sex orientations! You're only upset about this because what the people at GameStop and the Corporate Safety and Loss Prevention Team did was only done on YOU! You know what?! Shut up! Because you're doing nothing more than complaining about being punished for what YOU did that you KNOW was wrong, and spouting stupid, nonsensical crap through your piehole!
9:12 - Continuing support? People are not going to support you after what you've done. So, you got no support.
9:43 - I don't think people need to be reminded by you about the Amiibo figures, especially the ones you created of your "original" characters.
10:01 - And he ends the video by calling out GameStop. Now, people, assaulting a GameStop employee and getting banned from there is not the first time Chris caused trouble in public and got banned from a place where he caused that trouble in. One of the places in which he caused trouble and got banned from for it is called The GAMe PLACe. The GAMe PLACe was a store in Charlottesville, Virginia that sold toys, games, cards, and comic books, and Chris was a regular customer there. Not only that, but The GAMe PLACe also held Pokémon tournaments, which Chris would take part in, dressed as Ash Ketchum. He would get angry at anyone who had beaten him in a game there and shout at them, even at little kids. He also got angry when one time, Michael Snyder, the owner of The GAMe PLACe, got Chris to stop hogging the store's TV so that other customers could use it, causing Chris to write "Michael Snyder loves the 'F' out of Mary Lee Walsh" and getting banned from the store temporarily. He got banned from the store permanently after he got in a shouting match with a black kid, but instead of leaving the store, he called his parents over to the store to talk things over, and it didn't work, for Michael called the police, and Chris and his parents got put in their place. He would then keep going back in to talk to Michael about getting the ban lifted, and he was just told to leave each time this happened. In one of those times, Chris called Michael a "Jew", and he said it out loud as he left the store. In another time, when Michael called the police on Chris, Chris tried to escape using his car, nearly hitting Michael twice with it!
My God! Chris had caused a lot of trouble in other places like Target, Wal-Mart, Piedmont Virginia Community College, and Charlottesville Fashion Square, and he was banned from those places for causing trouble in them. Well, he didn't actually get banned from PVCC; he got suspended from there. Now, he got banned from all the GameStop stores in Virginia for assaulting an employee in one of those stores because of a color change in Sonic the Hedgehog's arms and trying to get the ban lifted when it's obviously not gonna happen. And after all he's done regarding GameStop, he decided to make the people working at GameStop and the Corporate Safety and Loss Prevention Team out to be the bad guys and not take any responsibility for what he's done wrong. This guy is even worse than AKnotholeResident and the girl who got kicked out of the Alamo Drafthouse for texting combined, and I've commentated on both of those people back in 2014. Chris never took any time to think about his actions before he did them, and he probably never will. I would tell him to stop all the sh*t he had been doing for years that caused him to get in trouble with the law, get ranted on, and get commentated on, but none of it would make any difference, so I'll just end right here.
It's good to have done a commentary done after 2016 started. As long as I'm able to find some commentary-worthy material that hasn't been talked about much and is still relevant to this day, I'll keep on making commentaries.
|
|
|
Post by babclayman on Jan 5, 2016 13:49:59 GMT -5
I hear you, Flo!
This Chris seems to live in a world, where actions do not have consequences!
This has nothing to do, with his autism! He went in to a place, which he had been barred, vandalsd a Promotional Stand, and then Pepper Spray a worker, while ordering they do not call any one, and cause this matter, to be sent to Court...cause he show anger, that Sonic's arms are blue! I think, that State Wide barring, is well in their right, as they have the right, not to have their workers attack by someone anger about some one's arms!
It's got to the point, where even Sega's America Twitter feed is making crcks about him!
I am seriously surprise, considering how much of a threat he is, to public safety, that he doesn' have a carer, or someone to make sure that he doesn' get in to legal matters, like this, Eh?
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Feb 14, 2016 15:58:55 GMT -5
Hey guys, Belchic here with another commentary for you guys.
I'm sure some of you YTP fans are familiar with Stuart K. Reily, the creator of YouTube Poop News. Well, he's canceled the show now and has moved on to other things, but his videos are still up for historical purposes. You may remember I did a commentary on one of his Top 10 lists, and this time I'm commentating on another one. This video is five years old, so a lot of the stuff he talks about is extremely dated, but I have some input on some of the stuff he said here. So without further ado...
*plays clip from PAW Patrol* Zuma: Let's dive in!
0:08 - Oh, yeah. I forgot about this part. Why don't we just... Skip it! Skip it! *skips to 1:15*
1:37 - *plays sound clip of kids applauding*
1:55 - I actually like your Top 10 videos.
2:02 - Yeah, that's one of my pet peeves about YouTube: users who treat their subscribers like currency. I made a whole rant about that a while back.
2:09 - And some of the things you list I admit I'm guilt of myself.
3:08 - *plays clip from "Monty Python and the Holy Grail"* Tim: Get on with it!
3:57 - See? This is what I mean about this video being dated. As of 2013, YouTube has discontinued the video response feature altogether.
4:09 - I think I know what you're talking about. There's one pooper I was once subscribed to, I don't remember his name, but every single poop he uploaded was a video response to Boogidyboo's magnum opus, "Toys Gone Wild". I wasn't really sure why because I didn't see any similarities to the poops or anything like that, but when I saw this video, that's when I figured out he was only doing it to get views.
4:24 - I've done video responses back when I did poops, but not to get views. I just felt my poop had similarities to the poop I was responding to.
4:52 - Some might say I'm guilty of this because I made a poop called "Dalmatians Gone Wild". One might think I was trying to reference "Toys Gone Wild", but no, that's just what I felt like naming it. Besides, I made it a video response to one of babclayman1's poops, and he doesn't get a lot of views either. So that should show you that I really don't care about views or subscribers. And I did that because bab is my friend. By the way, bab, I'm not trying to sound negative towards you, so please don't take this the wrong way!
5:00 - What do you mean by "taking the..."? Whatever.
5:26 - I don't think I'm guilty of that.
5:48 - Yeah, I remember you talking about that one. I believe that one isn't up anymore.
7:06 - I've PM'd big poopers to give them requests before (I'll talk about that later), but not to ask them to watch my poops.
7:30 - Okay, now that was funny.
7:50 - This is the first time I heard Stu mention Waxonator. The only poop of his that comes to mind that uses this item is "Stromboli Collects YouTube Poop", which I admit I helped him with seeing that he credited my name at the start of the video. Though I will say in my own defense the background music was not my idea. I don't know why he did it either.
8:23 - Are you kidding? I watched him religiously in 2010! Back then, he was my favorite pooper until he started getting a lot of subscribers and overrated.
8:32 - I've never seen the original source, so I can't see the point you're trying to make. Maybe you should've shown the unaltered version first or showed a more universally-known clip. I've never heard of Paper Doll Man in my life, and I'm sure a lot of other people haven't either.
9:10 - Yeah, like PoopTube. I was unfortunately gullible enough to join that site in 2009 back when I was a pooper because I for some reason thought YouTube was going to be shutting down and taken over by Hulu. Well, it's 7 years later, and YouTube is still going strong. Curse my gullibility!
9:45 - Yeah, so now those who joined won't be getting emails from them anymore.
10:06 - Sounds like a couple other forums I joined, like that MLP one with that troll we could never get rid of.
10:45 - I agree with you 100%. I could almost say the same thing about the Equestria Girls series.
11:26 - A lot of people don't like subtitles, but I think they're ok when you're trying to get people to know what they're saying. Sometimes it works, but other times it's annoying. Like in "Cookie Monster Asks for the Enclosed Instruction Book", that moment worked, and that made it funny.
11:54 - That example you just gave is a perfect example of how not to use subtitles in poops.
12:03 - I like that joke you did there.
12:36 - * plays clip from "Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog" Robotnik: NO!
13:01 - Don't try to fool us, Stu! We all know how obsessed you are with Sabrina! You can't hide that!
13:36 - I definitely agree, the Toys Gone Wild sequels have got to stop. By the way, you talked about copycat pooping in your second top 10, not your first.
13:47 - I don't think poopers should hold copyright to style. That's something fanboys take way too seriously.
14:02 - *plays "Price is Right" failing horn*
14:21 - Ah yes, the whole overrated Sub4Sub thing, which I never cared about from the beginning.
14:36 - Again, I don't know what you mean by the stuff hitting the fan.
14:57 - Tell me about it. I've heard of a lot of people who have done this. I don't need to remind you of Patch93, one of my biggest demeanors on YouTube who had a whole bunch of troll accounts and relentlessly stalked me here on Sparky's, but that's old news because he doesn't do that anymore thankfully. But I digress. Let's move on.
15:46 - Like I said: nobody does tennises anymore because the video response feature is gone.
16:54 - I think I've heard of this guy, and if he's able to make these lists, he must have no life. Not to mention none of the poops I saw on his lists appealed to me at all.
17:22 - But Stu, isn't that the kind of stuff you're into? I know you don't like flash poops, but Imaperson poops I believe are your kind of thing.
17:45 - You guys never were the Holy Trinity of YouTube Poop. Stop being so egotistical!
18:05 - Sounds a little like me. I may end up discontinuing watching "Littlest Pet Shop" if they don't end it soon because it's getting too predictable and less entertaining.
18:41 - I wouldn't either.
19:04 - Aren't your poops in Imaperson style too, Stu?
19:23 - I hope you weren't trying to sneak in a curse when you said "dictator".
19:29 - No, it's the other way around.
20:13 - I'm outta the loop with that one since I don't know what he's talking about.
Well, I don't really know what to say considering this video is five years old, but Stu really hasn't changed too much during his YouTube career. Though sometime in 2014, he made a video where he showed himself in the flesh admitting how much of a jerk he was in his old video and wanted to apologize to everyone he offended. It's always good when jerks have a change of heart. Though I have a feeling his hatred towards SpongeBob, MLP and Spadinner poops is here to stay.
End of commentary.
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Apr 24, 2016 18:42:20 GMT -5
Hey, guys! Belchic here with another commentary.
To those of you who have been following my commentaries regularly, you may have remembered a few months ago, I said that every single rant on YouTube that was on "PAW Patrol" and "Martha Speaks" was exactly the same word for word. Well, I double and triple checked, and my case still rests. Though there is one Martha Speaks rant that I wanted to do a commentary on because of how ludicrous it seemed. This rant was made by a user named Christine Bauch.
Now, this commentary is going to be a little different from my other commentaries, because I really don't have much to say about it, and I don't want to sound like I'm repeating myself so much, so for this video, I am going to attempt to do a one-shot commentary. Youngbloodfantasy91 is a natural at doing one-shot commentaries, and I never felt encouraged to give them a try since they're so short and don't seem easy, but this video seemed like a perfect one for me to try for my first one-shot.
Also, I feel this video needs no introduction. Just watch:
Okay, Christine, I don't know how old you are, but I doubt anyone will take this video seriously. You're just expressing your opinion and trying to make it look like your stuffed animals are talking, and you're not even doing a good job at doing that. Not only that, but you're also doing it in the car with your dad at a drive thru window. Wouldn't your dad question what you're up to? And wouldn't that distract him? Also, this video still follows the exact same script as all the other rants on "Martha Speaks" and "PAW Patrol". Why does everybody always do that? Where's the originality? Imagine if "The Jungle Book" followed the same script as "101 Dalmatians" word for word just with all the character names replaced with Jungle Book characters. It just doesn't make any sense. You know who likes these videos? Gumball. You know who hates these videos? Me! *sigh* What a waste of time that was.
|
|
|
Post by Flowgli on Jun 18, 2016 12:24:05 GMT -5
Hi, folks. Here I am with another commentary. Now, I've been having trouble finding commentary-worthy videos that are recent, so I decided to work on whatever I could find. For this commentary, I'm gonna be commentating on a two-parter that was uploaded in 2013 by bw rosas. In these videos, this guy talks about why he thinks Disney "needs" to make more direct-to-video sequels to its animated films. Clearly, this guy is referring to DisneyToon Studios, since most direct-to-video sequels to animated Disney films were made by that division of Disney. Now, DisneyToon Studios is very infamous for making cheap sequels to animated Disney films to capitalize on the success and popularity of said films, all for a quick buck, and it's really stupid of any company or any division of a company to make a sequel just for the sake of getting quick bucks, especially because of how successful and popular the original was. Now, starting with this commentary, I'm gonna be using a skip card whenever I skip parts of videos being commentated on, and this is what the skip card will look like: Now, with that out of the way, let's get on with this commentary. 0:52 - You're talking about DisneyToon Studios, right? Well, it used to make a whole lot of cheap direct-to-video sequels, but thankfully, it's not doing that anymore. And it should never have. For the most part, the sequels made by DisneyToon Studios suck ass. 1:05 - I have actually given up on direct-to-video sequels entirely somewhere in the mid-2000s. I couldn't take any more crap from that division of Disney from that point on, so I can't be expected to check out the later stuff that it has put out. 1:16 - I think by "video", you probably meant VHS, since you already mentioned DVD, blu-ray, digital, and on demand. Well, video cassettes are no longer made. In recent years, movies have been released on the other forms of home media you just mentioned here. 1:47 - More misses than hits. 2:10 - The Lion King 1 1/2 is one that I have mixed feelings about, to be honest. I don't have an absolute positive feeling about it or an absolute negative feeling about it. 2:26 - I am one of the people who consider The Lion King II: Simba's Pride better than The Lion King 1 1/2. In fact, I consider The Lion King II: Simba's Pride one of the better of the direct-to-video sequels from DisneyToon Studios and even one of only a few of the films from that division altogether that are actually good. 2:59 - I have seen The Lion King 1 1/2 either two or three times. I don't remember. It's been a bit over a decade since I've last seen it, but now that I think about it, I feel that it just recycles the original film and adds Timon and Pumbaa into every scene in some way, and it has Timon and Pumbaa do things that don't look like they even contribute to the original film. This film was probably made just because of how popular the characters Timon and Pumbaa are in the Lion King franchise. I believe their TV show, The Lion King's Timon And Pumbaa is enough, and that show lasted for four years and was done better than The Lion King 1 1/2. Yes, I said that. 3:26 - I don't think many people have looked at The Lion King 1 1/2 as a parody of the films in the Lion King franchise. I believe they, along with myself, looked at it as what it really is, and that is a midquel, and for the most part, midquels like this one are pointless. 4:06 - Okay, maybe a small number of people would consider it a parody, but it's actually a midquel that looks like it's adding to the original film. If it were to be a parody, it would've been a stand-alone film instead of a midquel. 4:29 - I wouldn't really call a direct-to-video sequel "great", no matter what it is. 4:46 - From what I've heard about Cinderella II: Dreams Come True, the three short stories featured in it were going to be episodes of a TV show based on the original film, but it never came through. 5:02 - Cinderella III: A Twist In Time is more of an actual sequel to the original film than Cinderella II: Dreams Come True, but it should be noted that making sequels to the animated films that Walt Disney himself worked on is disrespectful to all that he did, and he didn't like making sequels to his works, and he wouldn't like sequels made to his works if he was still alive today, either. *skips to 5:17* 5:26 - Yes, The Lion King II: Simba's Pride is considered a hit. Like I said, that movie is what I consider to be one of the better direct-to-video sequels from DisneyToon Studios and also one of only a few of the films from that division of Disney that are actually good. Though, there are also many people who don't like this movie as much as the original film, and this movie also has its share of people who don't like it at all. 5:32 - Yes, I remember watching The Return Of Jafar. I thought that movie was okay, but not as good as the original film in the Aladdin film trilogy. And when I watched that movie and other direct-to-video sequels from DisneyToon Studios that were released back in the '90s when I was a kid, I thought that only the most then-recent animated Disney films would have sequels, not the ones that were made decades ago. 5:48 - The Return Of Jafar actually mostly received negative reviews, but Aladdin And The King Of Thieves is a much better film in the Aladdin film trilogy. 6:10 - Even though sequels, midquels, whatever, like Lady And The Tramp II: Scamp's Adventure and Bambi II, as you mentioned here, stay true to the originals, to a certain extent, it doesn't change the fact that making films like these is disrespectful to all that Walt Disney did, not to mention that they are overall just plain bad. 6:19 - Those follow-ups may not have strayed away from the originals, but those originals don't need to be expanded on. If you want to see originals being expanded on, there's this thing on the Internet called fanfiction. I've seen fanfics that are in the form of follow-ups to animated Disney movies, and some of the animated Disney movies have different continuations written for them as fanfics, and all the movies that are follow-ups to animated Disney movies that preceded them by decades, those follow-ups are better off being fanfics instead of actual movies. 6:23 - They weren't that huge of hits. For the most part, they are huge misses. *skips to 6:49* 7:10 - Actually, most of the sequels to the animated Disney classics are misses than hits. They are mediocre at best and downright awful at most, but if you yourself like those sequels, that's fine. Just don't try to convince me and other people that they are as good as you make them out to be. And now, I'm gonna skip ahead again, because he repeats what he already said about the Cinderella sequels. *skips to 7:45* 7:59 - Recess: Taking The Fifth Grade, the third sequel to Recess: School's Out, was made by a different Disney unit. All four Recess films were made by Disney Television Animation, just like the show they are based on. I thought you were talking about sequels from DisneyToon Studios only. So, are you gonna talk about sequels from Disney in general? *skips to 8:15* 8:19 - Rarely? They have a lot of misses. I've seen and heard a lot about what was said about these sequels, and what was said about them was mostly on the negative side, and I've felt the same way about these sequels long before I checked out what was said about them, and I still feel the same way about them more than ever. 8:27 - Okay, what's with that scratching sound there? Maybe "scratching" isn't the right word for it, but I don't have any other words to describe that noise. Anyway, you're now bringing up Beauty And The Beast: The Enchanted Christmas. I can't say that that movie is really good, but it did well enough to be nominated for awards, and out of eight nominations, it won two, both of which were WAC awards. 8:48 - That other Beauty And The Beast movie you're talking about here is entitled Belle's Magical World. I haven't seen that one, but I've seen a lot of negative reviews and no positive ones about it. *skips to 9:01* 9:25 - The Little Mermaid II: Return To The Sea was more of a big miss than it was a hit at all. I've seen mostly negative reviews on this movie, and all those negative reviews I've seen on this movie say that it's basically a rehash of the original, and how lazily made it was because of that. That was exactly what I thought about that particular sequel when I watched it years before I saw all those negative reviews. So, no, this sequel is not a worthy successor to the original. 9:40 - The Little Mermaid: Ariel's Beginning did much better than The Little Mermaid II: Return To The Sea. I watched that movie once, and I myself thought it was better than that other Little Mermaid follow-up, but I wouldn't say that it's a worthy successor. Both follow-ups are not what I would call worthy. But I wouldn't call you or anyone else out for just simply liking them. And now, I'm skipping the next thirty-five seconds, because he just goes back to his thoughts on the Aladdin sequels and repeats them. *skips to 10:15* 10:29 - Okay, two things, sir. One: Please, stop repeating yourself, especially on how there are hits and misses with the sequels to the animated Disney movies. You had me repeating myself part of the time, as well. And two: Why are you walking off-camera? Unless this is the end of part one, you shouldn't walk out like that. The end of this part is not until the next four and a half minutes. 10:43 - What are you doing? Can you please come back on camera? 10:55 - Thanks for coming back on camera. When you walked out, I thought you were gonna go get something to bring to this video, like any home media of the Disney movies that you own, sequels or not, but you came back with nothing. You should've edited that part out or do a retake. Also, you're repeating your "hits and misses" comment again. 11:18 - A Goofy Movie is one of the Disney movies that I really like, but its sequel that came out five years later, An Extremely Goofy Movie, is not a worthy successor, either. I first watched that movie a couple of months after its direct-to-video release, and after having watched it, it felt as if everyone in that movie had forgotten everything that happened in A Goofy Movie, making Goofy and Max repeat the mistakes they made in A Goofy Movie in An Extremely Goofy Movie. In both of those movies, Goofy was very attached to Max, and Max was a jerk to Goofy, and the two bonded and became better father and son to each other. It actually would've been a good sequel if it didn't have Goofy and Max repeat having the same problems here that they had in A Goofy Movie. 11:27 - There you go again, walking off camera. Anyway, Pocahontas II: Journey To A New World is one of only a few of the direct-to-video that I actually enjoy watching. The reviews for that particular sequel were generally negative, and I understand why, but I liked that sequel as a kid, and I still like it today. 11:39 - Where are you, now? You're sounding more distant than you were when you walked off camera the first time. Also, even though I like that particular sequel, I agree that it was a miss. 11:46 - Okay, sir, I hope you'll stay on camera for the rest of this video. Anyway, I've watched The Hunchback Of Notre Dame II once, and years later, I've seen that the reviews for it were mostly negative. I myself don't find it as bad as people make it out to be, but I'd be lying if I said that I liked it. The biggest problem I have with that movie is how laughably cheap the animation is, compared to all the other direct-to-video Disney sequels, but when I watch animated movies like these, or animated movies in general, it's the story that concerns me most instead of just animation, just like it should everyone else. 12:01 - I've seen Mulan II a couple of times, and I've felt the same way about it. 12:18 - Will you please stop walking off camera?! This is the third time you've done that! Anyway, I haven't seen Hercules: Zero To Hero. I wasn't even aware of its existence back when it was new. So, I really can't say anything about that movie. 12:36 - Okay, that's good to know about that movie, and it's good to see that you're back on camera. Now, will you please stay on camera until the end of this video?! 12:54 - Well, to my shock, 101 Dalmatians II: Patch's London Adventure generally received positive reviews, and there are reviews on this particular sequel that are mixed. Now, I'm a 101 Dalmatians fan, but to be honest, out of everything in the 101 Dalmatians franchise, this sequel was what disappointed me the most. Out of all the Disney sequels I've seen so far, this one is one of the worse of them. What disappointed me about this sequel is not only the fact that it's a sequel to a film that Walt Disney worked on and was released decades before, but also how badly written the story, the dialogue, and the characters carried over from the original are. Seeing everything that happened in that movie, it looks like it's better off being a multi-part pilot episode of a reboot of the animated series. Speaking of the animated series, I actually prefer watching that over this sequel, but it probably would be kinda nice to see a reboot of the animated series come through. Anyway, I'm getting ahead of myself. I'm getting close to the end of part one, now. *skips to 13:02* 13:08 - Why should Disney go back to making sequels like these? I mean, these kinds of movies are really pointless. 13:20 - For the last time, stop walking off camera! And I think, by now, DisneyToon Studios already have realized that making sequels to animated Disney movies isn't worth it. Almost a decade ago, it has been decided that DisneyToon Studios will no longer focus on making sequels to animated Disney films, and instead, it will focus on making original material and spin-offs. If DisneyToon Studios is to make sequels again, then they will only make sequels to their own original and spin-off works, and they've done that in recent years with Planes and Tinker Bell. And boy, am I glad that they went in that direction. 13:35 - Yes, and that's exactly what happened with Planes. Also, thanks for coming back on camera. Hopefully, you'll stay put for the rest of this video. 14:07 - What is with you and walking off camera and walking back on camera? Stop doing that. Also, none of the other animated Disney classics deserve to have any sequels to them at all. They never needed them. They are just fine the way they are without them, and making sequels to them are only going to make things worse. There were plans for sequels to other animated Disney films, but thankfully, they were cancelled. Now, DisneyToon Studios is sticking to original material and spin-offs, like I said, and it's going to stay that way, or at least that's what I'm hoping. 14:23 - You sure are stuttering a lot right there. I suggest that you script yourself next time you make a video like this. Also, the animated Disney films that don't have sequels don't need them, like I said. Those films don't need to be continued. If you want continuations of those films, then read fanfics of them that are posted by other people on the Internet, or write a fanfic of one yourself. These continuations don't need to be in the form of movies. 14:34 - I don't know how a sequel to Robin Hood can be made a good one. How about you present that story as a fanfic, and maybe the readers will decide whether or not it would've been good enough to be an actual movie? Maybe not. Also, you've walked off camera so many times in this part alone that I might as well start a drinking game when it started. 14:54 - The Aristocats was one of the animated Disney films that DisneyToon Studios planned to make a sequel to, but that sequel, along with sequels to other animated Disney films such as Chicken Little and Meet The Robinsons, were cancelled when John Lasseter became the new chief creative officer of DisneyToon Studios and put the kibosh on sequels to animated Disney films, and that's definitely for the best. 15:00 - And that's the end of part one. Now, let's go to part two. 0:21 - First of all, why were the lights off in your kitchen when you started this part? Second of all, like I said in part one, the animated Disney films that don't have sequels don't need them. They are just fine the way they are without sequels. With the direction that DisneyToon Studios has been going in recent years, those animated Disney films have absolutely no chance of getting sequels to them ever made, even if those sequels were to be direct-to-video. It's just not going to happen. 0:36 - They're not gonna feel like making sequels to the animated Disney films that they haven't made sequels to, like Pinocchio. Sequels to animated Disney films generally take just about everything that made the originals good in the first place and throw it out the window. So, it's best that DisneyToon Studios just leave the remaining animated Disney films alone. 1:07 - No, they don't. Whatever movies DisneyToon Studios is gonna make, they're gonna do something new, not continue the old. They sure will be likely to do very well with original material and spin-offs. More sequels to animated Disney films are not gonna be liked by many people. Get what I'm saying? 1:23 - Scooby-Doo is a franchise that started off as an animated TV show called Scooby-Doo, Where Are You! The first film in that franchise called Scooby Goes Hollywood is a made-for-TV film, and it originally aired ten years after Scooby-Doo, Where Are You! premiered. Four more made-for-TV films in that franchise were made over the years, while many different TV series in that franchise were made around those same years. It wasn't until 1998 when it started having direct-to-video films made, starting with Scooby-Doo On Zombie Island. And why would you even think to bring up Scooby-Doo in this video? *skips to 1:30* 1:45 - I guess I can accept one's thoughts on the remaining animated Disney classics having sequels as opinions, but it's actually a fact that those films do not need them. Stop saying over and over again that these films need sequels. Can you seriously not come up with anything different to say? *skips to 1:57* 2:30 - I've seen Atlantis II: Milo's Return and all the follow-up films to Lilo And Stitch once or twice each, and I find them to be somewhere in the middle. I don't find them either good or bad. *skips to 2:51* 2:55 - No, these remaining animated Disney films don't deserve the sequel treatment. The points you have been making here are definitely weak. 3:25 - I'm pretty sure that a sequel to Tangled, especially in how you just described how you wished for it to be played out, will not come through or turn out well if it does. 3:43 - You're making the same point over and over again, and it's making me repeat myself. The remaining animated Disney films do not deserve the direct-to-video sequel treatment. You can't expect every single animated Disney film to have a sequel. One of each of these movies is enough. *skips to 3:59* 4:05 - The Rescuers Down Under is good, but it was made by Walt Disney Animation Studios, the same division of Disney that made the animated Disney classics. 4:21 - Well, there was going to be a third Rescuers movie, but it was cancelled due to the death of the voice actress of Miss Bianca, Eva Gabor. *skips to 4:32* 4:39 - Yeah, you were being a broken record by repeating the phrase "The point is..." a lot. I would use the "broken record" clip that KingdomKey10 used in his commentary on SAILORMOONRED1, but that can't be found anywhere on YouTube. Now, you better have something good to bring up, this time. 5:07 - Okay, I respect that, since you're stating that as your opinion. That still doesn't change the fact that most of the direct-to-video animated films, especially sequels to animated Disney classics, are definitely inferior, and that's not gonna get Disney to make more direct-to-video sequels to any more of its animated films. You're just gonna have to accept that. 5:54 - Sorry, sir, but they're not going to do that. They don't need to do that. Direct-to-video sequels are over and done with. And I know that this two-parter is three years old, but I will say that as of right now, Tinker Bell And The Legend Of The NeverBeast has been said to be the last film in the Tinker Bell film series, and it's the most recent film from DisneyToon Studios. The next film to come from DisneyToon Studios won't be until 2019, and it hasn't been said what the title of it or any other info on it is, but when it comes out, it most definitely will not be a direct-to-video sequel to an animated Disney film. 6:02 - A sequel to Bongo? Bongo is a segment featured in Fun And Fancy Free. Making a film that is a sequel to a segment of a film makes no sense. And what makes you think that people would want to see something like that? 6:16 - No, they don't. They've stopped making direct-to-video sequels for a reason. They don't need to go back to making them. Stop saying that they do! 6:38 - It doesn't matter what the correct word to use is as to what people have to see what would happen next to the characters or anything else from the animated Disney films in sequels. These films don't need sequels. They don't need to continue. They need to be left alone the way they are, because they are just fine that way. If people want to see continuations of these movies, there's fanfiction. Look them up for continuations of these movies yourself if you really want to see these movies continue. How hard is it to do just that? 7:12 - Well, I've taken the time to watch these two parts just to do this commentary, and I've said all I can about them during this commentary. I don't know what else to say about these two parts. However, there are some pieces of advice that I think I should give you on when you make another video discussing a certain topic. First of all, script yourself. This will help keep you from stuttering, making many pauses, and repeating yourself so much. Second of all, don't walk off camera and back on so much. Stay on camera while you're talking. Seeing you walk off camera and back on makes you look like you have no idea what you're doing in the video you're making. Yes, you've only done that on the first part and stayed on camera the whole time on the second part, but that doesn't change the fact that you've done that a lot altogether in this discussion. And third of all, and most importantly, try coming up with actually good and strong reasons as to why inferior and infamous things like direct-to-video sequels to animated films, especially from Disney, should start going on again. The points you've made in this two-parter were very weak and not good enough, and the fact that you think that DisneyToon Studios needs to go back to making sequels to animated Disney films makes you come off like you're delusional. You should've thought these videos through very carefully when you were making them. You're gonna have to do better next time you make a video discussing a certain thing, though I doubt that would be the case. Now, I know some people on here are taking a look at this commentary and they are pissed off about what I said about direct-to-video sequels from DisneyToon Studios, since they really like some of them, but whether that's the case or not, I need to get this one thing clear: I don't care if you like any of the direct-to-video sequels from DisneyToon Studios, no matter which ones they are, but you need to keep in mind that there's absolutely nothing wrong with people saying anything negative about any of those movies. Absolutely nothing wrong with that at all. Now, it's fine if you like any of those movies, but you need to keep in mind that there are going to be some people, especially those on here, like me, who are going to say something negative about those movies. And when people do say anything negative about those movies, you shouldn't complain about it; you should take it like humans growing up or being grown up and accept that not everyone is going to like the same things you like. Having anything negative said about any direct-to-video sequels from DisneyToon Studios or anything else you like by other people does not mean they're hurting you. Listening to negative things said about those movies or anything else you may like and taking negative opinions about them is a sign of maturity. People have the right to say anything they want about those movies you may like, even if it's negative, and no one can shut them up about it. That's something that you're gonna have to accept and live with. People who have negative things to say about those movies have freedom of speech just like you do and everyone else does. Do we understand each other? Well, I'm done here. Now, I know these videos are three years old, but like I said at the start, I've been having trouble looking for videos that are commentary-worthy and recent. I hope to have better luck on that next time I decide to do another commentary. So, take care, everyone, and have a good day.
|
|
|
Post by Flowgli on Jul 7, 2016 10:23:34 GMT -5
Hi, guys, I'm back with another commentary. Now, this one is going to be on a short video, so I'm not going to use my skip card on this one. To be exact, this video that I'm gonna be commentating on is a bit under two minutes; one minute and fifty-three seconds, if you will.
Now, before I explain the content of the video that I'm gonna be commentating on, I have to say that all videos on YouTube, whether they have the "m." in their web addresses or not, are showing when posted as videos again, so I no longer have to post videos as links. I've edited all my most recent posts with videos in them so that the videos are showing in the posts.
Okay. Now, the video that I'm gonna be commentating on is a movie review done by That Guy That Rants In A Hat That Most People Don't Wear, or TGTRIAHTMPDW, or DucktorHeyDucktor. But for the sake of simplicity, I'm gonna refer to him as Ducky. Now, the movie that Ducky reviewed in this video is the 2014 remake of Annie. This version of Annie was released on Christmas Day in 2014, but the review of it done by Ducky here was uploaded on May 16, 2014, which was a bit over seven months BEFORE the movie was released. Obviously, he did this review based on only what he saw in the trailer of that movie, and that trailer was playing throughout this video, and you know a review is gonna turn out bad when a reviewer judges a subject being reviewed only by what they have just seen in the trailer and nothing else. Yes, this is a negative review on this particular version of Annie, which is something I'm not surprised about, considering the things wrong with this movie pointed out by many people either before or after they've either seen the movie or just the trailer but don't make videos of themselves if those reviews are only based on what those people have seen in the trailer. Let's begin.
0:09 - Another review of this version of Annie? You mean you've done a review on this movie before? It's even worse if you're doing more than one review on a movie that wasn't released until months later, and those reviews were only based on what you saw in the trailer.
0:22 - This version of Annie has been seen as bad by many people for a number of reasons, some of which are legit and some of which are stupid, but hopefully, the reasons on why you think this movie is bad would be legit.
0:26 - "Because it's bad" is not a good enough reason as to why you think this version of Annie is bad. You're gonna have to come up with something better than that.
0:48 - You saw a prescreening of this movie? Well, I suppose that explains a bit how you're able to actually get around to reviewing this movie seven months before its official public release, but it still doesn't change the fact that the way you're doing this review sounds as if you're judging the movie by what you only saw in the trailer and not in the movie itself. Also, seeing prescreenings of movies does not make you better than anyone who does not get to see prescreenings of movies. And you don't know everyone who sees prescreenings of movies and who don't anyway, so you are in no position to say things like that.
0:52 - Seeing prescreenings of movies does not make your opinion valid, either.
1:00 - Will Smith's kid? As in Willow Smith? The girl that played the title character in this movie is Quvenzhané Wallis, not Willow Smith. Also, I've watched some clips of this movie, and from what I saw from them, it looks like Quvenzhané Wallis did well with what she had to work with. However, Willow Smith was originally considered for the role of the title character, but she dropped out of the movie.
1:10 - Quvenzhané Wallis did her best, and she seemed to have done well enough. And you're ridiculous for putting together a review video that doesn't have any thought put into it.
1:27 - Will Smith is involved in this film, but he is not in it as Will Stacks. Will Smith is one of the movie's two producers, with the other producer being Jay-Z. The guy who played the role of Will Stacks in this movie is Jamie Foxx. Also, what makeup? It doesn't look like Jamie Foxx had any makeup applied on him to make him look different for his role in this movie.
1:32 - That's what Jamie Foxx's character is, though, a rich politician. His character, Will Stacks, is this Annie remake's version of Daddy Warbucks.
1:45 - You hate this movie because it has lots of orphans in it? I'll have you know, right now, that this version of Annie has absolutely no orphans in it. All the little girls living under the care of the bitter Miss Hannigan are foster kids, not orphans, and there are only five foster kids there. That's not "lots and lots and lots" of them. And what problem do you have with orphans anyway?
1:52 - So, you hate orphans and black people? What problems do you have with them? Orphans are children who have no parents because their parents either died or left them permanently. Orphans live hard times. They struggle through having to live their lives without parents at a young age. Black people lived hard times; they were treated differently and very unfairly, and it's all because of the color of their skin. That's racism. There's been racism towards black people decades ago, and there's still racism towards them today. Now, I myself am wondering if you're a racist yourself. And you know what? After hearing you say that you hate black people, I'm getting the feeling that you actually are a racist. Why are people who have lived hard times, and still are, such as black people and orphans are a big issue to you? And what's with that awkward cut at the end?
In conclusion, this review of the 2014 remake of Annie done by Ducky is bad. He sounded arrogant in this review, he got some facts wrong about the movie, and he gave ridiculous reasons on why he thinks the movie is bad. Out of the review videos I've seen on this version of Annie, at least the people who gave negative reviews on it in those videos have good reasons to do so, and out of all those reviews I've seen on this movie, I've found the review of it done by Christi Esterle to be the most logical. Christi Esterle is the host of a webseries called Musical Hell, where she reviews musical films that she thinks are bad, and she does this as a character known as "Diva", the judge, jury, executioner, and anything else that fits into the subject she is tackling, which, in the case of the 2014 version of Annie, is evil orphanage matron. She uploads one new review in this webseries every month. I highly recommend this series to all of you. Go check out that webseries. Christi Esterle is good at what she does there.
Now, going back to Ducky. Look, Ducky, it's okay to have your own opinions on movies and expressing them in review videos, but when you make these review videos, you must know to get your facts right, come up with legit reasons as to why you think a movie is bad and not dumb ones, and not sound or act pompous and arrogant when you speak your mind about the movie you're reviewing. But you're probably going to make the same mistakes you made in this review in your later reviews, are you? And you probably made those same mistakes in your later reviews, that is, if you did do any more movie reviews after this. I'm not even going to bother to check if you did or didn't, but if you did, then I'm going to punish you the same way Christi Esterle, or "Diva", punishes bad musical films and anyone involved in it. So, the court of Sparky's 101 Dalmatians' Commentaries is ordering the following punishment: For giving the dumbest reasons for thinking the movie that is the subject of his review is bad, failing to get his facts right, and acting and sounding pompous and arrogant in this video, we condemn Ducky to watch every movie that mainly focuses on black people and orphans while in a room surrounded by such people who will beat the living daylights out of him if he ever uses that as a reason as to why he thinks a movie is bad...forever. So, let it be recorded. This session of the infernal court in Sparky's 101 Dalmatians' Commentaries is now adjourned. *bangs gavel*
|
|
|
Post by Flowgli on Aug 2, 2016 20:38:56 GMT -5
Greetings, people. Welcome to another session of the infernal court in Sparky's 101 Dalmatians' Commentaries. I'm Flo, your judge, jury, executioner, and big Disney movie fan. I have been a fan of Disney movies since I was a little kid, and I still am today. However, it doesn't mean that I have to like every single Disney movie, and it doesn't mean that I have to expect every one of them, or even any of them at all, to have sequels to them made. As a true Disney movie fan, I know a good Disney movie when I see one, and I know a bad Disney movie when I see one. And most of the bad ones I've seen are most of the cheapquels from DisneyToon Studios. Yes, the next video I'm gonna be commentating on does have everything to do with DisneyToon Studios, just like the commentary I did on bw rosas's two-parter on why he thinks DisneyToon Studios should go back to making direct-to-video sequels to animated Disney films. As I noted in that commentary, that two-parter is three years old, but the video that I'm gonna be commentating on is all one video, and it was uploaded on YouTube somewhere around Easter this year. This video is uploaded by bearRimshot, or Teddy Macedo. In this video, this guy gives his thoughts on what the next film from DisneyToon Studios will be. Like I also mentioned in the commentary I did on bw rosas, the next film from DisneyToon Studios will come out in 2019. The actual date of this particular film's release has been announced to be April 12, 2019, and this particular film also has been announced to have a theatrical release. That's all the information that has been revealed about this film. Now, a sensible Disney movie fan like myself should know what to expect in this upcoming film from DisneyToon Studios and what not to expect in it, given its history of making cheapquels that, for the most part, received a sh*tload of mixed to negative reviews. Now, what exactly is this guy expecting in this upcoming film from DisneyToon Studios? Everything he says in this video better be good. Let's examine the case of "What are bearRimshot's Thoughts on the New and Upcoming DisneyToon Studios Film?" 0:11 - I certainly had a Happy Easter this year, since I was fortunate not to find this video at the time. 0:28 - I'm not surprised at all that there's going to be another film coming from DisneyToon Studios. That division of Disney has been putting out multiple films each year up until 2015. Very little films were put out during the first few years of that division's existence. DisneyToon Studios is still active, and it's going to spend a few years making a film that will hopefully turn out really good, so it really shouldn't be any surprise to you that DisneyToon Studios is going to put out another film. 0:33 - I know what DisneyToon Studios is. I'm even providing some history behind it and its future, so I don't need to hear you explain to me what DisneyToon Studios is. *skips to 1:13* 1:16 - Well, nobody is sure yet as to what the next film from DisneyToon Studios will be. No information on this film has been revealed yet except its release date and how it's going to be released. 1:41 - Seriously? You really want this upcoming film from DisneyToon Studios to be a sequel to an animated Disney classic? You do realize that those kinds of films are not that good, and DisneyToon Studios has stopped making these kinds of movies when John Lasseter took over that division, don't you? 1:52 - Actually, they are. Most of these sequels to the animated Disney films were made with nice but cheap animation, bad writing in the stories, dialogue, and characters from their predecessors, inferior songs that are decent at best and bland and awful at worst, and no heart. 2:19 - Well, if you know that Walt Disney never liked making sequels to his works, and that John Lasseter has cancelled all future sequels to animated Disney films when he took over DisneyToon Studios, then why the hell would you want this upcoming film from that division to be a sequel to an animated Disney film? 2:26 - Actually, he cancelled sequels to animated Disney films because a lot of the sequels that were put out were atrocities, not just The Return Of Jafar and Mulan II, and it's also because he knows that these sequels took everything that made their predecessors good in the first place and threw it all out the window. These films were made and put out to suck money out of people's pockets, nothing more. 3:03 - Yeah, I've looked up that a third Peter Pan movie was planned a long time ago. It may have disappointed you, but I myself am glad that that movie got cancelled. Return To Neverland may have had a bigger budget than those of the sequels that were released direct-to-video by DisneyToon Studios, as this particular sequel was released theatrically, but it really isn't that good. Also, let's remember that Peter Pan is one of the animated films that was made by Walt Disney himself decades prior. 3:53 - Actually, Moira in the movie Hook is Wendy's granddaughter. Wendy in Return To Neverland has one daughter and one son. 3:59 - I never read the Peter Pan book, so I never knew about this character named Margaret. However, I just looked up this character, and it's been stated that she is Jane's daughter, and that she was only mentioned at the end of the story. 4:17 - To be honest, if there's to be an animated project that is made to add to Pinocchio, I'd expect it to be a spin-off that centers around Honest John and Gideon, not a sequel to that animated Disney classic. Also, a sequel to Dumbo was planned, but it was rightfully cancelled when John Lasseter took over DisneyToon Studios. 4:22 - I've heard about the live-action remake of Dumbo being in the works, and I think that's a better move that Disney made than making a sequel to the original animated film. 4:39 - It's been many years since I've last seen The Great Mouse Detective, but I can say that despite its ending, and despite that it was made two decades after Walt Disney died and therefore not one of his own works, I doubt that a sequel to that movie is possible, considering how forgettable that movie is, to begin with. 5:10 - From what I've found out, a sequel to Who Framed Roger Rabbit? has been planned, and according to Robert Zemeckis, the director of Who Framed Roger Rabbit?, a sequel to it is still possible, even after the death of Bob Hoskins. Also, if a sequel is to be made, it would be likely to be released by Touchstone Pictures, another division of Disney, just like the original, not DisneyToon Studios. *skips to 5:42* 7:11 - It would be really difficult for this sequel to feature some of those characters, as some other companies may not even want the characters they own the rights to to be featured in this sequel. Also, the original already had a lot of cartoon characters to work with, and some of the characters you mentioned weren't in the original because they were created sometime after its release, but it is possible that some of these characters will be featured in the sequel. 7:21 - Finally, there's a sequel to talk about here that is actually going to happen! Yes, there's gonna be a sequel to Wreck-It Ralph, and from what I've heard about this sequel, it'll be released theatrically in 2018. However, it'll be released by Walt Disney Animation Studios, not DisneyToon Studios. 8:04 - Yeah, it definitely would make sense to have more video game characters featured in the sequel, but it would also make more sense to have more original characters added to it and not have the added video game characters be treated as the main focus of the sequel. *skips to 9:08* 9:26 - Which it isn't. 9:38 - Okay, a film based on a Disney TV show would be something good to come from DisneyToon Studios. 9:46 - Um, okay. Well, I haven't seen Star Vs. The Forces Of Evil, so I really can't say anything about that show, especially when it comes to autism. 10:35 - Well, this is DisneyToon Studios we're talking about here, and all films put out by that division are completely animated, no live-action scenes whatsoever. And I don't think it's possible for shows from the Toon Disney era, whether they're original shows from that now-defunct channel or older shows that aired originally on other channels and now-defunct blocks, as they all have ended a long time ago and probably been long-forgotten by many people. If this upcoming film from DisneyToon Studios is gonna be based on a TV show, it's obviously gonna be based on one of the animated Disney TV shows that are current. *skips to 11:17* 11:31 - Well, Doug's 1st Movie, which was put out by Walt Disney Television Animation and not DisneyToon Studios, by the way, was criticized very harshly when it came out, and no sequels were ever made or even planned because of that. *skips to 11:47* 12:00 - Well, who doesn't love Winnie The Pooh? It's one of the biggest and longest-existing Disney franchises. It's got many films, and it's got a number of TV shows and specials. Actually, there's gonna be a live-action film of Winnie The Pooh coming soon. Unfortunately, that's not the kind of Winnie The Pooh film you wanted; you wanted an animated one. Sorry, but there's no word on that kind of film you wanted yet. *skips to 13:49* 13:59 - A Mickey Mouse movie would be nice. That's something that DisneyToon Studios could be working on, since they made two Goofy movies, so if they could do that, then I believe they can make animated films that are all about Mickey Mouse and all the other Disney core universe characters. *skips to 14:53* 15:01 - A movie about Oswald the Lucky Rabbit? Well, I guess that could work, since Oswald the Lucky Rabbit was actually created by Walt Disney, even though Universal had the rights to the character for decades until 2006 when Disney CEO Bob Iger got back the rights to the character from a trade with NBC Universal, which got sportscaster Al Michaels from said trade. After that trade, Oswald appeared in the Epic Mickey video game franchise as one of the main characters, and he was the subject of an independent film from 2015 called Walt Before Mickey. *skips to 15:44* 16:20 - Okay, well, a movie based on Kingdom Hearts can be done, since there are many movies based on video game franchises. But how would you say a movie based on Kingdom Hearts would be played out? I haven't played any of the Kingdom Hearts games, so I'd like to hear from you on this. No skipping this point, honest. 17:46 - There's still Mark Moseley, since Eddie Murphy is probably doing other stuff and not able to voice Mushu again. After all, Mark Moseley is known for voicing Mushu in everything that character appeared in after the original Mulan movie. 18:13 - So, you'd also like for DisneyToon Studios to make a movie that's either based on Epic Mickey and Disney Infinity? You really are into movies based on video game franchises, particularly Disney video game franchises, aren't you? 18:47 - You really have a lot of expectations on what you want the next film from DisneyToon Studios to be, don't you? And taking a look at how much of the video there is left, you have very little expectations on what you don't want the next film from DisneyToon Studios to be, am I right, Teddy? 19:11 - Well, Tinker Bell And The Legend Of The NeverBeast has been said to be the last film in the Tinker Bell film series, so the people who actually watch these movies and like them won't get to see more Peter Pan characters appear in this film series. 19:28 - So, you've got another expectation on what you do want the next film from DisneyToon Studios to be? And that expectation is that you also want this film to be a Disney Princess movie? Well, another movie in the Disney Princess franchise would've been possible had it not been for the reviews on Disney Princess Enchanted Tales: Follow Your Dreams, which, as of now, is the only film in the Disney Princess franchise. Then again, another film like that wouldn't be possible at all, as making a Disney film that are all about princess characters from other Disney films is impossible to actually get right, and Mary Costa, the actress who voiced Aurora in Sleeping Beauty, was not fond of Disney Princess Enchanted Tales: Follow Your Dreams, and she felt that it did not work. 19:49 - Well, judging by the reviews the Planes movies got, it is likely that there's not gonna be any more films in that spin-off series, and I doubt that there are gonna be any more Cars spin-offs. Right now, there's gonna be a third Cars film from Pixar, but that's about it. 20:11 - Tackling anything from Pixar is actually a dumb thing that DisneyToon Studios can do. I feel that everything from Pixar should remain done by Pixar and not have done more to them by DisneyToon Studios, an inferior division of Disney. 20:17 - Really? A film that is all original is not something you expect from DisneyToon Studios? 20:42 - Yes, Walt Disney Animation Studios is known for making original animated films, and DisneyToon Studios is known for making animated films that are about things from Disney that we're all familiar with, but that doesn't mean that DisneyToon Studios can't make any original films using the things from Disney that we're all familiar with. Original films that are all about Disney core universe characters can be done; they did that with DuckTales The Movie: Treasure Of The Lost Lamp and A Goofy Movie, for example. Granted, they are follow-ups of animated Disney TV shows, which, in this case, are DuckTales and Goof Troop, respectively, but they're still original films. And now, I'm skipping to the end, because this guy just rambles on about other divisions of Disney for the rest of this point. *skips to 21:10* 21:29 - Well, once again, I had a good Easter, and back then, I was fortunate enough to not have found this video. I found this video late just last month, I took the time to put together this commentary, and I'm glad to be done with this video. Some of your expectations on what you wanted the next film from DisneyToon Studios to be are okay, but your other expectations, particularly this film being a sequel to an animated Disney film, are outright ridiculous. You said that you knew that Walt Disney never liked making sequels to his works, and that John Lasseter cancelled all future sequels to animated Disney films when he took over DisneyToon Studios, so why in the holy mother of f*ck were you expecting the next film from DisneyToon Studios to be a sequel to an animated Disney film? And even worse is that in the description of this video, you've provided a link to a petition that you came up with to get DisneyToon Studios to make more sequels to animated Disney classics! Are you crazy? Do you think that coming up with a petition to get DisneyToon Studios to make more sequels to animated Disney classics is gonna actually get that division to degrade itself so low as to produce such insulting catastrophes of ass? And in that petition, you have part one of bw rosas's video on why he thinks DisneyToon Studios should go back to making direct-to-video sequels to animated Disney films shown there! I commentated on both parts of this guy's videos, and he made a lot of weak points in both of those parts on the subject! And a few of the people who commented on the petition are just as dumb as you and bw rosas are! Those supporters complained about the reboots to animated Disney films and said that John Lasseter was wrong to cancel all future sequels to animated Disney films! You--you morons! You idiotic, illogical, overweight, stubborn d*cksh*ts! URGH!!! Okay! Okay. I'm gonna calm down in a bit. I'm gonna get myself together again. Okay. I think I'm good, now. Now, like I said at the end of the commentary I did on bw rosas, even though there are people who like sequels to animated Disney films, it needs to be kept in mind that there's absolutely nothing wrong with people saying anything negative about any of these movies at all. None. Zip. Zilch. Nada. It doesn't matter if there are people who actually like any of these movies, it doesn't matter if they like seeing their favorite characters in new adventures, it doesn't matter if they like seeing the stories of animated Disney films continue, and it doesn't matter if any of these movies hold special places in their hearts. There are also people who will say negative things about any of these movies, and they have every right to say negative things about them. For the most part, these movies are so bad that they actually deserved to be bashed by a lot of people. Most of these movies are so bad that John Lasseter actually made the right decision in cancelling all future sequels to animated Disney films, and after seeing films like these, who can blame him? Now, I don't care if there are people who actually like these films; it doesn't change the fact that they're mostly bad, and it doesn't change the fact that there are people who will say negative things about them. And if any people who like these particular movies get all butthurt over other people saying something negative about said movies and not take the negative things said like mature, grown adults that they're supposed to be, then that just proves that those particular people are blind Disney fanboys and manchildren and womenchildren, and nobody wants to be seen as someone like that. Yes, I'm bringing up my rant on people who don't take very well the fact that whatever things they like so much get talked about negatively into this, because it bears bringing up. Anyway, getting back to Teddy Macedo, he's one of the people who really want DisneyToon Studios to make sequels to animated Disney films again, just like bw rosas, and he had the nerve to come up with a petition to get that division of Disney to do that. It's equally as stupid as AKnotHoleResident coming up with a petition to get Sega to go back to the design of Sonic the Hedgehog with the black eyes. And Teddy's petition requires a goal of one hundred supporters. Thankfully, that petition closed after getting only fifty-eight supporters. And even if that petition did reach the goal of one hundred supporters before it closed, did Teddy really think that DisneyToon Studios would actually go back to making sequels to animated Disney films? Right now, DisneyToon Studios is spending years to make a good film that will be released theatrically on April 12, 2019. They're putting a lot of time and effort on this movie, and they are not gonna stop and throw away all that hard work just so they will make yet another cheap, rushed-out sequel with no thought or care put into it that blind Disney fanboys want so much. Seriously, you guys, do you really want DisneyToon Studios to shut down? Because for some time, now, DisneyToon Studios has been in danger of getting shut down. Many employees there got laid off in recent years. Do you really want more people there to lose their jobs? Do you really think it's a good idea for DisneyToon Studios to stoop as low as to making cheapquels to animated Disney films again? Do you really think it's a good idea for DisneyToon Studios to go back to making rushed-out films with no thought or care put into them for the sake of making money? Do you really think it's a good idea for DisneyToon Studios to be the infamous cheap movie-making division of Disney it once was just when it's doing better as of late and now working so hard to make better movies? Why do you people have such ludicrous expectations on what you want future films from DisneyToon Studios to be? Why do I even bother commentating on people like you? At the end of the last commentary I did, I officially made myself a judge, jury, executioner, and anything else that fits into the subject I am tackling, all right here in the commentaries topic; I judge these videos, and I punish the people who made them, but to what purpose for Teddy Macedo for this video? There are probably more people on YouTube who are like this guy and bw rosas, and they probably made videos where they say that they like cheapquels from DisneyToon Studios, think those particular movies are generally good, expect DisneyToon Studios to make more cheapquels, and come up with weak, stupid reasons as to why DisneyToon Studios should make more sequels. And if there aren't more people like these two guys on YouTube at this time, I'll bet that there are going to be more people like them coming on YouTube, uploading videos where they talk about the same thing and come up with the same dumb reasons and points as these two guys, and I would end up repeating myself if I ever had to force myself into commentating on them, which is something that just happened here. These people never learn and probably never will, and I would end up having to give out the same results each time. I don't know if life as a Disney fan is worth living anymore! I don't even know if life as a fan of ANYTHING is worth living anymore! I--I just--I--I--ugh--I just need to get out for a minute! *angrily bangs gavel twice, storms out of the room, and slams the door*
|
|
|
Post by Flowgli on Aug 10, 2016 17:11:07 GMT -5
Greetings, people. Welcome to another session of the infernal court in Sparky's 101 Dalmatians' Commentaries. I'm Flo, your judge, jury, executioner, and school headmistress.
You know, guys, after doing commentaries on bw rosas and Teddy Macedo, I've made the decision to live under a rock so I can keep myself from coming across any more videos of any more stupid people wanting DisneyToon Studios to make cheapquels to animated Disney films again. Well, I've lived under that rock for some time, now, and believe me, it is a rock worth living under. These guys are so stupid that they all deserved F's for making these stupid videos. As a matter of fact, everyone I commentated on in this topic deserved F's for all those videos of theirs that I've looked into. This person that I'm gonna be commentating on in this case is Lambo Rocks. With a name like that, he must've known a lot about 101 Dalmatians: The Series and liked the character Lambo, whether or not he likes the episode "On The Lamb". Or maybe that name was just a coincidence. But regardless, the video of his that I'm gonna be commentating on is his rant about school. This video was uploaded on February last year. What does he have to say about school in his rant? Let's examine the case of "School rant" and find out.
0:10 - Honestly, I don't care about which rants you're switching with which other rants. This is a rant about school, not an announcement on when you'll be doing each rant. So, will you please just get to the point?
0:18 - Well, school may feel like Hell to some kids, since they have to deal with hard school work, other kids who pick on them or just overall have a bad nature, and things like that, but school is there for a reason, and it's to get kids prepared for the real world for when they grow up, get jobs, and live their own lives.
0:23 - You didn't just see school; you've also been to it. You must've been taught enough stuff in school to get to where you are up to the date you've uploaded this video. However, you probably haven't been taught a lot, considering the way you talk about school in this video and just show an image of a school building sideways on an iPad screen for about the entirety of this video.
0:32 - Well, of course, you have to go to school from Mondays to Fridays about each week every school year. What do you expect? School may be boring, but it's still important to pay attention to what the teachers are teaching you and what they're saying to you. If you don't, you'll end up failing in your classes, and you'll end up being either held back or kicked out of school, and neither of that is any good. Also, making fun of teachers is a bad thing to do. They are there to teach you all that you need to know for when you become an adult doing all you would need to do to survive in the real world. And there is probably gonna be at least one teacher in every school who comes off as an a**hole, but you would be no better than that teacher if you're just gonna resort to making fun of that teacher and call that teacher names.
0:38 - Getting punished by a teacher for swearing and doing anything else that would get you in trouble should be no surprise to you. There are rules in school, and students have to follow them. If students break any school rules, they will get punished, and getting detention and getting suspended from school are a couple of the punishments students receive for breaking school rules. You're probably against school because you've probably broken some school rules and got those same punishments for doing so yourself, and if that's really the case, then you should really be blaming yourself for it and not the teachers, and you should've followed the rules and not do anything that got you in trouble in the first place.
0:52 - Well, students shouldn't be watching any videos that have bad language or any other inappropriate material in school. If you're gonna watch videos on a computer that is school property--and you probably shouldn't be on YouTube on a computer that is school property anyway--then all the videos you're watching on that computer have to be school-appropriate. YouTube and other video-sharing websites weren't around when I was in school until somewhere in the second half of my year as a junior in high school, but I wasn't even aware of websites like those until somewhere in the second half of 2006.
0:56 - You see, this is the reason why you shouldn't make a video that shows nothing but an image on an iPad screen; the screen turns off automatically when not in use for a certain number of minutes. Of course, you can make the screen stay on for as long as you want by changing the settings.
1:05 - You know what's really pathetic? YOU. Also, when I was in school, I wasn't very fond of some of the lunches served at the cafeteria, but I did like some of the food there. And roast dinners? What school do you go to that serves roast dinners at the cafeteria? Because in every school I went to, there were no roast dinners served at the cafeteria, not even just roast or just dinner.
1:18 - Okay, boy, everything you said right there really shows how much of a horrible student you are. I mean, really? You want the teachers to die? You really want the teachers to die just because they are doing their jobs in teaching everything you need to know for when you become an adult and live your life as one and punishing you whenever you break any rules? You're not gonna grow up to be a good person with an attitude like that. And you're not gonna end up to be a better student if you prefer staying at home and watching movies over going to school. That's not gonna get you anywhere.
1:24 - Wow, you really ARE a horrible person! I was right! You're hoping that school would be blown up, burn in Hell, and never exist again? You and every other kid, especially every kid your age, have to go to school. It's a part of life. Getting an education is really important. School is never, ever gonna go away.
1:48 - No, it won't be awesome. The way you talk about school just makes everything you say and do just stupid. There are some things about school that I actually enjoyed, while there are other things about it that I didn't enjoy but dealt with anyway. And I don't know about the first character you've shown right there, but Elsa from Frozen? She wasn't even shown dealing with school in that movie, so no one even knows for sure if she likes school or not, but everyone knows for sure that she does NOT want to kill anyone, not even students or teachers, with her ice powers! Sure, she did cause harm on others with her powers, particularly her little sister, Anna, but all that harm she ever caused was unintentional, and she has been struggling to keep her powers under control.
2:06 - To be honest, I don't find Transformers: Age Of Extinction all that good, but it and school are both a lot better than you. Seriously, boy, f*ck you.
2:10 - Well, I won't be sticking around for that rant. Now, about this rant you just did here, Lambo--if you really want to be called that--it just shows that you are a really bad kid with absolutely no concern about your education and how your life is gonna turn out without an education when you become an adult. What did your parents think about this rant, and what would they think about it if it still holds up today? They must've been very angry with you about it and punished you for it. I don't know if you made another video about school after this one and shown in it that you probably have different thoughts on school, but I'm not even gonna bother to check if you made a video like that.
It's one thing for a kid to hate school for understandable reasons, but it's another thing for that kid to make a video rant on school consisting of horrible, ignorant, awful reasons. In where I live, kids are going back to school in a week or two, since there are now commercials shown on television about stuff needed for back to school. I don't know where this kid lives, but he should be like every good kid and get himself ready to go back to school when the first day of school is near. And I don't care how old he is, because he probably got held back for a few years, judging by how he is acting in this video. As for punishment, I would just give him an "F" in every school assignment he worked on and would work on after uploading this video, but that probably wouldn't do enough justice, so instead, the court of Sparky's 101 Dalmatians' Commentaries orders the following punishment: For saying mean, rude, and harmful things about school, we condemn Lambo Rocks to be reincarnated as a black sheep, get taped up by Lucky from 101 Dalmatians: The Series, and get a majority of his wool ripped off from the removal of the tape. Think of it as Lucky getting back at Lambo for taping him up in the episode "On The Lamb". So, let it be recorded. This session of the infernal court in Sparky's 101 Dalmatians' Commentaries is now adjourned. *bangs gavel*
|
|
|
Post by Flowgli on Aug 23, 2016 15:46:14 GMT -5
Greetings, people. Welcome to another session of the infernal court in Sparky's 101 Dalmatians' Commentaries. I'm Flo, your judge, jury, executioner, and hater of anti-haters.
Now, guys, as people who have been Internet users for years, it should be sunk into your heads that there is hate spread around places on the Internet, particularly YouTube, and there always will be hate going on in places on the Internet like that, no matter how much you want it to stop. There are people out there who express how much they hate certain things, such as certain movies, certain TV shows, certain books, certain video games, certain characters, certain celebrities, and certain politicians. But there are also people who see negative comments on the things they happen to like or negative comments on those people themselves, and then get all pissed off and make immature, b*tchy responses to those negative comments, often resulting in getting bashed and ridiculed by many other people. Sometimes, when they make responses like this to negative comments on them or whatever they like, they go as far as addressing the "haters", telling people who said anything negative about them or what they like to stop hating on them or the things they like, give weak and stupid reasons on why whatever they like is good or even one of the best things ever, or insult the intelligence, nature, and lifestyle of the people who said anything negative about them or the things they like. This is something that I have tackled in my rant on people who don't take very well the fact that whatever things they like so much get talked about negatively, and I will be commentating on a video that fits into the subject of people addressing the "haters". But before we begin, I'd just like to say that people who address the "haters" never, ever win against the "haters", and that surely will never, ever happen. Addressing the "haters" doesn't make them better people or make the "haters" like them or the things they like. If anything, it only makes them fools and even worse and more stupid people, and it also only makes the "haters" hate them or the things they hate even more. To all of you people who address the "haters" for saying something negative about you or what you like, you really need to get out of your basements and get lives, and get over the fact that people are saying something negative about you or what you like. Keep in mind that when people say something negative about you for the way you immaturely respond to people who say something negative about what you like, you bring it upon yourselves. If you don't like it when people say something negative about what you like or even you, then the places on the Internet where those negative comments are made, or the Internet overall, it's just not the place for you, and you shouldn't even be on the Internet. Seriously, you guys, build a bridge and get over it.
Right. Now, the person that I'm gonna be commentating on is a kid whose username is Vinnie Tender RoteaFTW WeatherStar4000VideoFTL. But for short, I'll just call him Vinnie. In the video of his that I'm gonna be commentating on, which was uploaded in the middle of May this year, by the way, Vinnie complains about the fact that there are people who have been disliking his videos, and he really doesn't like it when people do that. So, because of that, he disabled the comments and the likes and dislikes for this video. Yeah. Let's examine the case of “Haters Rant (STOP DISLIKING MY VIDEOS!!!!!!!!!!!!)”.
0:07 - What did you call your viewers right there? I know you just call them a name, but I can't clearly make out what it is, and that's because of the sound of the camera being moved around. Maybe it would help if you'd just keep the camera still so your viewers can understand you.
0:30 - Well, nobody likes their haters. You're not the only person who hates their haters. And any sensible person would know to find a mature way to deal with their haters, which is what you are not doing here yourself.
0:44 - You're hoping that your haters get terminated from YouTube? Why? Just because they said something negative about you or your videos, which is actually their honest opinions and supposedly constructive, civilized, and logical? That's not going to happen. And blocking them is something you can do if the hate you keep getting from them is really bad, such as insults, threats, and things like that.
1:01 - FD for "free dislike"? Vinnie, people can dislike any of your videos if they think they are bad, even if they have FD for "free dislike", that is, if the likes and dislikes are not disabled, but the likes and dislikes for this video are disabled, so your haters are not able to dislike this video anyway. Also, do some scripting and rehearsing before you make a video like this to prevent making long pauses like these, and stop moving the camera.
1:10 - Kid, didn't you pay attention to what I just said? People have every right to dislike your videos if they think those videos are bad as long as the likes and dislikes for those videos are not disabled. Also, with you saying "or else", I feel that the very next thing that you're gonna say is a threat that nobody is going to take seriously, considering that it's gonna come out of the mouth of a kid.
1:21 - So, if people keep disliking your videos, you'd have no choice but to make them leave your channel forever? I believe that's impossible, kid. There's just no way to keep them away from going to your channel and watch your videos and even using your videos for commentaries, which is what I'm doing, right now, and I'm not even a member on YouTube.
1:43 - People are not gonna be intimidated by you and the way you just acted right here. People can still come to your channel anytime they want to either watch your videos or use them for commentaries even if you block them.
1:48 - I already stated twice about people still having the right to come to your channel to watch your videos and use them for commentaries. I'm not gonna say this again.
2:04 - Are you really serious about this? People who dislike your videos owe you money? Nobody is going to send you a dime, let alone $160. Vinnie, just get off YouTube, because you obviously have no idea how it works, other than uploading videos and disabling comments and likes and dislikes, but that's about it.
2:30 - People are not gonna stop disliking your videos, no matter how many times you demand them to. Even if you say "please", they're still not gonna stop disliking your videos. And whether your videos have FD for "free dislike" or not, people have the right to dislike those videos. If you don't like it when people dislike your videos, then you can just disable the likes and dislikes for those videos like you did with this one.
2:38 - How about no, you crazy kid? And the next time you demand your viewers to stop disliking your videos, I definitely will be playing the Dr. Evil clip from Austin Powers In Goldmember.
2:47 - You're not gonna get only likes from people. Stop being so demanding about this.
2:58 - Against what rules? Rules that only exist in your head? Because there are no rules on YouTube that says that people are not allowed to dislike other people's videos.
3:04 - That's it! You asked for it! I'm playing the clip!
*plays clip from Austin Powers In Goldmember*
Dr. Evil: (drives his chair to Goldmember and turns it around to face him) How 'bout no?
(Play the clip below to actually see it yourself.)
(And now, back to the commentary.)
3:12 - And people are tired of people like you making such a big deal out of people disliking your videos.
3:19 - I'm not playing the Dr. Evil clip again, because once is enough. But I will let you know, right now, that demanding people to stop is not gonna make them stop; it's just gonna make them keep on with this, and it's gonna stay this way until you grow up and learn everything there is you need to know when it comes to being on YouTube.
3:24 - Now, you're using a bomb threat? You're gonna blow up someone's house just because they dislike your videos? Using threats like that won't get you anywhere. Besides, you're a little kid, so there's no possible way you can actually blow up someone's house even once, let alone sixteen times. All you're doing here is making a fool out of yourself on the Internet. Stop doing that.
3:37 - People are not gonna be terminated on YouTube forever or any length of time at all just because someone dislikes your videos. Please, take some time to learn this.
3:43 - Nobody is going to listen to you, Vinnie.
3:48 - It better be the end of the rant, because this rant is just plain sh*tty. Now, you better come up with something good to say for the last minute and second of the video.
4:00 - You are nobody's father, Vinnie. You're a little kid. You don't have the right to ground people for disliking your videos. And people are not going to care if your videos are FD or not; they can dislike your videos if they think those videos are bad as long as the likes and dislikes for those videos are enabled. And the likes and dislikes for this video are disabled, so not only can people not dislike it, but they also can't like it. So, why even bother expecting people to like this video when the likes and dislikes for it are disabled to begin with?
4:04 - You're gonna ground people who dislike your videos for "nine bazillion ages"? *bursts out laughing* Okay, now, I know that people are definitely not going to take you seriously.
4:12 - People don't care if you're kidding or not. They're not gonna listen to you, they're not gonna take you seriously, and they're not gonna send you any money at all, and that's because they don't owe you any money at all, not even for disliking your videos.
4:19 - Vinnie, why would anyone like this video after hearing everything you said in it? I don't like it, and I'm sure without a doubt that everyone else doesn't like it.
4:30 - Again, the like and dislike buttons are disabled for this video, so no one can click the like button. And even if the like and dislike buttons are enabled, no one would ever click the like button. Also, who would ever subscribe to you after seeing stupid videos from you like this one?
4:49 - And that's the end of the video. Now, on with the verdict.
This video just goes to show that kids Vinnie's age really don't belong on YouTube, because kids don't know what to expect and what not to expect when on a site like this, and they easily get pissed off when they see that they have gotten dislikes and negative comments on their videos. This is why YouTube requires people to confirm that they are at least 13 years old in order to become members there and upload videos there. Vinnie doesn't look or sound like he's at least 13 years old; he looks and sounds more like he's no older than 11 years old. But I don't care how old he is. People of all ages, whether they're old enough to be members on YouTube and upload videos there or not, have to understand that when they upload videos there that are found bad by other people, then getting dislikes and negative comments are something that they have to expect. If they don't like getting dislikes and negative comments on their videos, then they shouldn't have uploaded those videos on YouTube in the first place. And if those people resort to b*tching about getting so many dislikes and negative comments on their videos, then YouTube is not the right place for them, and they shouldn't even be there. YouTube is definitely not the right place for Vinnie, so he shouldn't even be there. Therefore, the court of Sparky's 101 Dalmatians' Commentaries orders the following punishment: For complaining about people disliking his videos and demanding those people to stop, we condemn Vinnie to have his channel on YouTube terminated, go outside, and get ridiculed by every person who walks past him for the next five years. Hopefully, he would have some sense knocked into him by the time those five years are over, and he'd know very well enough what to expect and what not to expect when on YouTube as a member again. So, let it be recorded. This session of the infernal court in Sparky's 101 Dalmatians' Commentaries is now adjourned. *bangs gavel*
|
|
|
Post by Flowgli on Sept 19, 2016 21:05:38 GMT -5
Greetings, people. Welcome to another session of the infernal court in Sparky's 101 Dalmatians' Commentaries. I'm Flo, your judge, jury, executioner, and Sailor Scout.
Remember when I did a commentary on Duane Skip McAllen, also known as SAILORMOONRED1, or as he is known today as SAILORMOONTUBE11? Well, guess what? I'm gonna do another commentary on him. Now, back when Duane was a big, popular target in the rant and commentary community, which was mostly in 2011, he had been making several videos a day, and that's one of the things well-known about him pointed out by a few people who rant and commentate on him. Now, I may not be a member of a video-sharing website like YouTube or even one who makes videos, but a good video maker and member of a video-sharing website takes a lot of time making videos in order for them to come out good before uploading them on the Internet. I mean, there's more to making a video than just recording something with a camera; there's also scripting, editing, and doing retakes, and as you can tell from that other commentary I did on him and some of the videos he uploaded, he doesn't do any of that when he makes his videos, and he refuses to do so. In this video that I'm gonna be commentating on, Duane explains that he is now uploading only one video on YouTube a day and why he uploaded a lot of videos a day in the past. Let's examine the case of "SAILOR MOON & SAILOR JUPITER WHY WE ONCE MADE A LOT OF VIDEOS".
0:03 - And just like the other video of his that I commentated on, this video begins with Duane letting out a burp. Tee-rific.
0:14 - And just like in nearly all his other videos, Duane holds up Sailor Moon dolls in front of his face and speak in third-person perspective so that he's making them speak for him. Seriously, Duane, you have been doing this in your videos for years, and you have been criticized by many people for years because of it. Will you please just put down those dolls and speak as yourself? You're not a little girl; you're an adult male.
0:40 - You mean SAILORMOONRED1. That's the name of your channel on YouTube that had the most attention back when you were a big target in the rant and commentary community.
1:14 - Just about everyone who said how many videos you made and uploaded to YouTube back then did not make up the numbers of those videos. Those numbers they said are real or estimated, and they knew at the time how many videos you had in your SAILORMOONRED1 channel because they hovered their cursors on their computer screens over the channel name link under one of those videos and see a bit of information about that channel appear, including the number of videos on that channel.
1:26 - You know, Duane, you don't need to make videos everyday to keep the attention of your subscribers. There are popular members on YouTube like youngbloodfantasy91 who don't make videos everyday and still have the attention of his subscribers. Speaking of subscribers, haven't you even realized that all the subscribers you had were sub-for-subs and trolls? Those kinds of people didn't subscribe to you for your videos; they subscribed to you just for the sake of it. And people like other people's videos and not yours because those other people's videos have effort put into them and yours don't.
1:41 - By one video, do you mean one video a day or one video in total? Also, just because you made many videos a day doesn't mean your subscribers won't turn their attention away from your videos to someone else's. They'll still turn their attention away from your videos regardless, because all your videos sucked in the first place, and they still do today. And how could you like the idea of making many videos everyday in order to keep the attention of your subscribers, who, again, are sub-for-subs or trolls? And there are many people on YouTube who are subscribers of more than one other channel there, and they somewhat give equal attention to all those channels they're subscribed to; they don't give all the attention to only one of all those channels they're subscribed to.
1:54 - All that's still not a good enough explanation. You've been a member on YouTube for years, so, hopefully, by now, you've learned a lot about what it means to be a member there, especially when it comes to making videos and uploading them there. However, since you didn't take any criticism from other people on how you can make better videos because you think people who criticize you are "bullies", which they're really not, I'm sure that you haven't learned anything about it, and I'm sure that you never will.
2:07 - Yeah, you sure got people's attention from uploading many videos a day some of the time, but out of all the attention you got from doing that, it's all either short-lived or negative, neither of which are the kind of attention you wanted.
2:20 - Mostly negative. Also, do I really need to tell you yet again that all of your subscribers are sub-for-subs or trolls, and that they only subscribed to you for the sake of it, not because they like your videos? And whatever positive comments you got on your videos are actually from yourself. I know this. Everyone knows this. You made many sockpuppet accounts, and you used them to pretend that you are your own subscribers and friends so you could comment on your own videos. Yes, people, he did this, and he is still doing it to this day! Why would anyone even f*cking do that?!
2:31 - Which is still a lot of videos. Uploading videos everyday, no matter how many videos it is you upload everyday, is still too much. If you upload videos everyday, especially since all your videos show nothing but you playing with dolls, then that just shows that you have nothing better to do with your life. Maybe instead of making videos everyday, you should be spending most days doing other stuff that'll get your mind on something other than videos, YouTube, and dolls.
2:45 - And they're right. Also, now uploading two videos occasionally is still too many. You need to find something else to do other than making videos of yourself playing with dolls and uploading them on YouTube, like reading a book, doing some chores around the house, going outside and taking a walk around your neighborhood, having a conversation with your family, going to the movies, and going to the mall, but don't buy any more dolls or toys to use in your videos.
2:57 - Quality over quantity is one of the most important things you and everyone else needs to remember, especially when it comes to making videos. And how could quality over quantity not have seem to work for you?
3:03 - And now, you're making the dolls speak to each other in a video like this. Why am I not surprised?
3:15 - And the people who say that it's quality over quantity are right, because instead of caring about how many videos you make, upload on YouTube, and have in your YouTube channel, you should care about making a video a really good one. It's better to make a few good videos that are done with a lot of effort put into them than to make a lot of bad videos that are done with no effort put into them at all.
3:26 - Exactly! Your videos would have a lot of views if you keep the "quality over quantity" thing in mind and take some time to actually make your videos good. Many people, myself included, have taken a look at the view count on each of your videos, and all those videos each have very little views. None of the videos you uploaded even reach one hundred views, well, except for a few of your oldest ones. But my point still stands. All your videos suck, and making many videos with no effort put into them made people NOT want to watch them. If you can't be bothered to do better in making videos, and you're just gonna keep making videos the same dumb way you always did, then making videos isn't the right hobby for you.
3:42 - You probably don't know this, but making videos is a choice, not something you are supposed to do everyday. Nobody is making you make videos and upload them on YouTube everyday. Nobody is forcing you to do that everyday. You have a choice to either make and upload videos. It is a choice, not an obligation. It is a hobby, not a priority. You could've taken all that time you've spent on making and uploading videos to do many other things, but you chose to waste all that time making videos and uploading them on YouTube instead.
4:14 - Uh, why are you bringing autism into this? I mean, I have heard from just a few people like TOGProfessor who claimed that you are autistic, and I have a feeling that they are wrong on that, but let's not get into that.
4:52 - So, you finally admitted that making and uploading videos is a hobby. Well, since you made and uploaded a lot of videos everyday in the past, you treated this hobby of yours as a priority. You still do, even though it's only one video you're making everyday and two on occasion. And what are you putting down the Sailor Jupiter doll down to do right there?
5:01 - Oh, you had to take care of your nose. Okay. I just have to say that when you feel something come up, take care of that before you start making a video. Health comes first.
5:17 - This is one of the reasons why people criticize your videos. You don't edit your videos. Many people who criticized you pointed this out. Even I pointed this out on the other commentary I did on you. After many of us have pointed this out to you, we thought that you would take that piece of advice and use it to make your videos better, but you didn't. You're still making videos that have stuff that other people edit out in their videos. Why don't you listen to other people who were trying to help you and do some editing on your videos for a change?
5:39 - That should've been the reason, because then, you would actually take some time to listen to the people who have been trying to help you make your videos better by giving you tips, and then use all those tips to make your videos better. If you've listened to all that advice you were given, then people would stop getting on your case on how bad your videos were and still are.
5:47 - Like I said, making videos and uploading them is a choice, not an obligation. It's not something you have to do everyday, and it's not something you should be doing everyday anyway.
5:57 - The "quality over quantity" thing should work for everyone, and the only way it wouldn't work for someone is if that someone just brushed it off, treated it like it's nothing, and ignored the fact that it exists.
6:09 - I have a feeling that you haven't even tried the "quality over quantity" thing yourself. Not once. When you were first told this, you probably brushed it off, treated it like it's nothing, and ignored the fact that it exists. How about you give it a chance, and it'd make a great difference in the way you make your videos? How about that?
6:25 - Oh, trust me, Duane, I know very well what this video is all about, and so do all of maybe two or three other people who saw this video, and that's because it's in the title of this video. We can clearly see that for ourselves, you know.
6:46 - You mean just your nose. There's no "our". Those dolls don't share the same nose with you. They're not even alive.
6:57 - Even though you use a Kleenex to blow and wipe your nose, you still have to edit that and all the other parts where you had to deal with your nose out of the video. Heck, you shouldn't even be making a video while you're in a condition where you had to constantly deal with your nose.
Anyway, that's the end of the video. As you can tell, this video sucks just like all his other videos. He didn't do any editing, scripting, or retakes, not to mention that he used Sailor Moon dolls, especially when he's talking to his viewers on specific topics like the one of this video. With the way he makes videos, especially his use of dolls, little girls' playthings, in those videos, it's very clear as crystal that he cannot be taken seriously. Not at all. And since he's still using the same crappy method of video-making as he did for years, it's also very clear as crystal that he never listened to criticism or any advice on how to do better in making videos. Because of all this, there is definitely no doubt that he's gonna keep making videos this way and not listen to any criticism and advice on how to do better in making videos. So, the court of Sparky's 101 Dalmatians' Commentaries orders the following punishment: For making so many crappy videos, especially this one, with the use of Sailor Moon dolls and without any effort put into them to make them good, and for also refusing to listen to criticism and any advice from other people on how to make videos better, we condemn Duane Skip McAllen to get his ass kicked by those Sailor Moon dolls after they become possessed by the Devil. So, let it be recorded. This session of the infernal court in Sparky's 101 Dalmatians' Commentaries is now adjourned. *bangs gavel*
|
|