|
Post by Flowgli on Jun 26, 2017 21:56:30 GMT -5
That was before I saw this video he uploaded a month ago. Besides, I didn't give him a punishment on the other commentary I did on him before this one, since I didn't establish the court theme in the way I do commentaries.
|
|
|
Post by Flowgli on Aug 26, 2017 21:21:08 GMT -5
Greetings, people. Welcome to another session of the infernal court in Sparky's 101 Dalmatians' Commentaries. I'm Flo, your judge, jury, executioner, and hunter of people who exploit other people's deaths.
As you know, a YouTuber named Emer Prevost, better known as Hellsing920, passed away at age 34 earlier this month due to complications of a hernia that he had a surgery on. After his death was announced on Facebook by his brother, other people on YouTube made videos that paid tribute to him. Hellsing920 was known for his rants and his movie review series called Reaction & Review. However, as with the deaths of many other well-known people, there is someone who has exploited the death of Hellsing920. That person is our next offender, MTN Productions, formerly known as HomeoftheGoodGuys. MTN Productions was infamous for making pointless rants about things on VHS tapes and DVDs, such as logos, warning screens, covers, and special features, and about not getting diamond editions of some animated Disney films.
In this video of his that I'm gonna be commentating on, he exploits the death of Hellsing920, and he does it big time. This video was uploaded by him about three days after Hellsing920 died, and he rightfully got sh*t for that video, and he deleted it. However, this video was reuploaded by gurigorloX, so I'm able to do a commentary on this video and show you guys how exploitive it is. Now, let's examine the case of "A Major Announcement And Sad News on the Passing of Emer Prevost".
0:13 - Really? You're gonna use a crappy program like GoAnimate to share what you have to say about Hellsing920? Not a good idea, man. That'll just make your message even more exploitive.
0:21 - Now, do you see how exploitive it is when you use GoAnimate to make an announcement? The voices used on that program are flat, which shows that you're putting no emotion in what you're saying here. You know, MTN, instead of using GoAnimate and speaking as the characters you made for this video, you should speak as yourself and use your own voice to show how serious you are about what you're talking about.
0:41 - How could anyone not remember something like one's death that just happened about three days before you uploaded this video? Unless someone has never heard of a well-known person until the day you uploaded this video or is not a fan of that well-known person's works, there's no reason to forget their death that happened only three days prior to the day you uploaded this video.
1:22 - I have a really good feeling that you don't even care about the fact that Hellsing920 died, since you're using these GoAnimate characters to speak about all this. Seriously, I've seen other videos that you did in the past, and you did use a camera and speak as yourself in those videos. So, why couldn't you do the same thing here? Why did you resort to using GoAnimate for this? You are making this video really exploitative, and you don't have any shame for what you're doing? With you exploiting Hellsing920's death and using a program like GoAnimate, you're definitely not one to say that Hellsing920 was a "beloved friend". Heck, I highly doubt that you and Hellsing920 were ever friends on any level.
1:36 - WHAT?! No! No, no, no, no, no, no, no! Taking over Reaction & Review, Hellsing920's own series, is not a good idea! In fact, I've heard from another YouTuber called sirleibl1 that Hellsing920 said that Reaction & Review is over when he dies. Everyone respected that decision that Hellsing920 made. Everyone except you. You can't just take over someone else's series like that. That'll be like if youngbloodfantasy91 dies and someone else takes over The Logo Corner. You can't do that. You want to do a series on YouTube, especially one where you do reviews on movies or other stuff? Then, I suggest you make your own series. Is that so hard?
1:46 - No, that's not a great idea. Please, refer to my last point, because I'm not gonna repeat what I just said.
1:58 - I'm sure that even after you made this video, you haven't done anything that is worthy of being called a "tribute" to Hellsing920. And you keep your filthy hands away from his Reaction & Review series. You taking over his place as the host of his series and making even more episodes for it will not do it any good.
2:10 - I sure won't be having my fingers crossed at all for any of those. I am not a fan of those other series you made yourself, not even the MTN Shorts. I don't even watch those series. And because you use GoAnimate to make your shorts, and after you made this video that exploits someone's death, I don't plan to watch any series you put out. Like, ever.
2:25 - Are you kidding me?! So, not only are you exploiting the death of Hellsing920, but you're also featuring him in this video as a new character for your own videos? Hellsing920 wouldn't be happy about this. I'll bet he's rolling in his grave, right now.
2:31 - So, you're making the Hellsing920 "character" here claim that your shorts are now his, and you're making him actually want to take part in your shorts with your other characters? You don't know what Hellsing920 was really like, do you? Do you know him personally? Now, I may not know him personally, but I know that he wouldn't want a fictional version of himself to be featured as a character in someone's crappy video series.
2:56 - Okay, so, Hellsing920 had been around on the Internet for around ten years, give or take a year or two, and for the most part, his videos are well-received by many people, but I find it low that you're making the Hellsing920 "character" thanking the real Hellsing920's viewers on behalf of your channel as well as his channel. And are there really more people on your channel? Because I always thought that you're the only person on it. That's what I've seen on your videos where you point your camera at movies on home media and rant behind the camera.
3:06 - Okay, this part really made me facepalm. MTN got Hellsing920 to be "brought back to life in 'comedy world' form". That's a really stupid thing to do when you make a video about someone who just died! Have you no sympathy, MTN?!
3:09 - Yeah, right. No one is gonna enjoy anything you have planned to do with your Hellsing920 "character". They're not even gonna enjoy anything you have planned to continue the Reaction & Review series. Just leave that series alone. It's over when Hellsing920 died, and it should stay over.
3:19 - I really hope you don't bring your Hellsing920 "character" back in more of your videos. It's enough that you used this "character" for just this video, which makes it exploitative enough, but having this "character" appear in more videos will just make it even more exploitative!
3:31 - And that's the end of the video. By the way, I won't be seeing you or any more of your videos, MTN. After seeing this video, I found it very clear that you have gone downhill, not that you were ever any good at making videos that are tolerable, to begin with. This video is very exploitative, and it shows that you just want to have Hellsing920's Reaction & Review series all to yourself and turn it into a joke with that GoAnimate program. That's really despicable of you, man!
MTN reminds me a lot about someone else. Do you know who? Andrewthesoldierhog. Both MTN and Andrewthesoldierhog each made a video that exploits someone's death, used a program to cover up their real voices in their video, and deleted their video shortly after they uploaded it when they got immediate negative feedback from other people for it. Five years ago, Andrewthesoldierhog made a video where he exploited the death of musician and composer Jon Lord and used Speakonia and an image of a crying Sonic sprite recolor. He deleted that video as soon as he uploaded it, but a commentator on YouTube called MrSirRaven found that video, and he was able to save it and commentate on it.
While we're on the subject of videos being deleted from YouTube, I'll bet that MTN got really upset that his video where he exploited the death of Hellsing920 got mirrored, just like how Chris-Chan got really upset that his video where he gave a tour of his very filthy house got mirrored. Though, I'm gonna say to MTN exactly what Hellsing920 said to Chris-Chan. MTN, if you're this stupid enough to put up something like that on the Internet, it has every right to stay up. You, sir, need to think before you upload anything, because from what I've seen of your videos so far, it's obvious that you've been putting very little thought into anything you've uploaded. Seriously, how dare you exploit someone's death, especially in this way? That really was a boneheaded stunt you pulled. Don't ever do that again! And to make sure you don't pull a stunt like this ever again, you are condemned to take history classes with Andrewthesoldierhog at Midtown High School. That'll get you to not only stop exploiting deaths of other people, but also appreciate what people did that contribute to either the world or certain communities before they died. So, let it be recorded. This session of the infernal court in Sparky's 101 Dalmatians' Commentaries is now adjourned. *bangs gavel*
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Oct 7, 2017 14:12:58 GMT -5
Hey guys. This is Belchic with another commentary.
You know, there are people on the Internet who give other people a hard time, and some never change for years, but they eventually do.
One particular YouTube user from early 2011 is the infamous Sonic recolor artist, GyroHedgie453. He caused tons of drama back in the day, and people have made commentary after commentary on his videos. Well, in the summer of that year, Gyro went AWOL and supposedly deleted his account, but a year later, he came back with this apology video. I know, Gyro is a dead horse ten times over, but I feel like commentating on this video of his just to see what the fanboy has to say. So without further ado...
*plays clip from “PAW Patrol”* Zuma: Let’s dive in!
0:12 - Yes, but you are still symbolizing yourself with a recolored hedgehog, and you’re still using Speakonia. So far, you’re not much different from Joshua8428.
0:18 - Good! It sounds like you’ve learned your lesson.
0:21 - Oh, God! I hope it’s not another minute-long intro with horrible recolors!
0:35 - *plays clip from “The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad”* Prosecutor: You expect me to believe that?!
0:46 - Not to mention it was a horrible thing to say.
0:57 - But Gyro, you’re using an image of your recolor right now! You see? This guy is still being a hypocrite! Also, I still don’t get why he keeps pronouncing YouTube as “Ya-chewb”. How is he spelling it in Speakonia?
1:07 - Oh, I guess that answers my question, but he is still basically a red Sonic. Let’s just hope his bio is an improvement and not a Gary Stu.
1:41 - Yeah, those are just some of the users he was unfair to. There was also Fishermanphil73 and TheBlackbusterCritic to name a couple more. Though I don’t know why he would apologize to his troll accounts because they’re his own accounts.
1:53 - *plays clip from the MLP episode: “A Canterlot Wedding”* Twilight: Likely story!
1:59 - *plays clip from Digimon* Izzy: Sounds like someone I know.
2:10 - *plays clip from the Homestar Runner toon: “The House That Gave Sucky Treats”* Strong Bad: You got that right!
2:16 - That sounded to me like an annoying beg. How do you expect me to take that seriously?
2:18 - Well, Okay then.
Final verdict: It does sound pretty convincing that Gyro has finally come around to good terms. It’s kind of hard to believe, but he hasn’t made any other videos since this one that look like the garbage he’s done in the past, so it looks like he kept his word. Of course, he didn’t say what his new account would be called, so I guess we will never see his true identity. Although he is posting stuff on his troll accounts still, and those don’t need to be taken seriously. Overall, it just goes to show you that even these kinds of people can change. I was just recently unblocked by someone I thought would never unblock me, so anything can happen. We just gotta be patient. I guess this closes another chapter in Gyro’s book, and this video was a fitting end to the terror.
This concludes this commentary. This is Belchic signing out.
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Jan 10, 2018 12:30:56 GMT -5
Hey guys! Belchic here with a new commentary. I know it’s been God knows how long since my last commentary. This is a commentary I’ve been wanting to do for a long time, but I’ve held off on doing it for a while because I was afraid I might get some backlash on it here. Now you’re probably wondering why. Well, it’s because it is a video made by one of the members here on Sparky’s. I am talking of course about our good friend, babclayman. Now before you start sending me your hate mail, this commentary is not going to contain any hate speech or anything like that, but rather just comments in general. I may give a small criticism here and there, but most of it is just going to be said in a conversational tone rather than a critical tone. The video of his that I am going to commentate on is his “Homages in 101 Dalmatians” video. The real reason I’m doing this is because I have so much to say about the video that it won’t fit on the comments box on YouTube! I do realize I’m taking a huge risk in making this commentary, but I’m just doing this for fun. So without further ado... *plays clip from “PAW Patrol”* Zuma: Let’s dive in! 0:09 - Ah, Yes. That is a very classic way to start this video. Though I ponder why characters like Thunderbolt were in there. 0:14 - I’m pretty sure Star Trek wasn’t the only show where they said “Engage”, so I’m not sure if that should count as a pop culture reference. 0:22 - Okay, I’ll give you that one, but I think other sources have spoofed that one. 0:45 - Man! This show had a lot of Star Trek references! Though I guess understandably, Star Trek is to television as Star Wars is to movies or as The Beatles are to music. 0:54 - Heh, Classic! 1:12 - Again, I’m pretty sure The Wizard of Oz wasn’t the only source that used the phrase, “I’m melting”, nor do I think that’s where the phrase originated from. 1:18 - Whoa! I never noticed that was a reference to Airplane! 1:40 - I’ll give you that one. I’m pretty sure Jurassic Park made that water thing famous. Come to think of it, I’m actually thankful this show predated The Matrix, otherwise I’m sure they would have parodied it for sure! 1:52 - I think that game postdates that show. I thought that bit was parodying Super Mario 64. 2:20 - The Famous Scooby-Doo doors have been parodied a lot, even though the clip you showed was actually from Johnny Bravo. 2:36 - Wow! A reference to a real life event? I’m surprised you found that reference, let alone an event that happened in my home state! 3:02 - Yep. That is what they were referencing alright. Man, I miss this show! 3:14 - I caught that reference the first time I saw the episode believe it or not! I’m glad you knew about it too! 3:24 - I figured that was an MST reference, but I was a tad disappointed the pups didn’t do riffs like what the Powerpuff Girls did. youtu.be/8h5Fo4KELvE3:57 - I think the clip speaks for itself. 4:20 - That was definitely Jingle Cats! Though I’m surprised you actually found a video clip for it! 5:00 - I was disappointed that they showed a coyote and roadrunner in that scene. It’s like they gave away the reference. I like it better when they make you try to guess the reference. 5:14 - Of all the couch gags The Simpson’s had, I’m surprised you found the very one that was used in the 101D episode! There’s gotta be close to 1,000 of them, maybe even more! Oh, by the way, now that Disney owns The Simpson’s, this makes the whole scene legit now. 5:21 - Short and simple. 5:29 - It’s kind of odd that in the movies, Thunderbolt is made to be more like Rin Tin Tin, but in the series, he’s made to be like every action movie star in existence: James Bond, Indiana Jones, and the list goes on. 5:52 - I think that might be a bit of a stretch. The scene is a lot different from the scene from Goldfinger. It’s not like the Dexter’s Lab episode where they actually parodied the line. youtu.be/B_XWUKeH5GU6:13 - As if I don’t see that scene enough times. Also, whoever’s idea it was to ship Mooch and Cadpig together, I have no idea what they were thinking. 6:29 - I’m not sure if that’s exactly what they were referencing, but if not, I take the blame for it. 6:39 - I think that name was used on Sesame Street once, so unfortunately this show wasn’t the first to make the parody. youtu.be/FDlmbptJtjM6:50 - I’m surprised you haven’t made that a joke in a YTP yet. 7:23 - Again, I think you’re stretching it. It’s not like Winnie the Pooh is the only cartoon character who ever got stuck. Though it’s still interesting you showed that clip considering it contained reused animation from the 1961 101 Dalmatians animated movie! 7:37 - Ah, Mommy Dearest. I never would have guessed that. 7:47 - Well, That was a creator illusion. The show was created by Jim Jinkins, the creator of Doug, which Disney owned the rights to when this show was in production. 7:59 - It’s not that hard to guess the reference there. 8:27 - A lot of sources say that was Jock from Lady and the Tramp, but I find that debatable. It could be any Scottish Terrier, and giving that breed a Scottish accent is kind of a classic stereotype ence the name of the breed. I mean, I know he made a cameo in the movie too, but is there any further evidence that that very Scottish Terrier actually is Jock? That’s kind of a stretch. That would be like if I said the Taco Bell Chihuahua was Tito from Oliver & Company. I think you might be jumping the gun here. Just saying. 8:33 - And I’ve been waiting patiently for a sequel to this video, which still has yet to surface. There are still a ton more homages in the show that bab didn’t cover in this video, so I’m really hoping he makes a sequel soon. I know he’s busy, but I look forward to it regardless. Overall, if I were to grade this video, I’d give it an A-. It was an awesome video, but it had a couple flaws in it that I think may have been stretching it a bit. I know bab has been talking about doing a sequel to this video, and I look forward to seeing it when it comes, and maybe this commentary will encourage him to get to work on it. That’s all I gotta say on this. This is Belchic signing out.
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Apr 13, 2018 10:49:08 GMT -5
Hey guys! Belchic here with another commentary for you guys. Today, I’m doing a commentary on a guy named NO FOOLS Anime, who does a rant on The Lion Guard. Now, I know what a lot of you are thinking: “Oh no! This isn’t going to be another Confused Matthew, is it?” Actually, no. This rant is more like a typical rant on YouTube. He doesn’t dig too deep into things like what Matthew did, but let me tell you, this guy tries too hard to make it look like this show sucks. So without further ado...
*plays clip from “PAW Patrol”* Zuma: Let’s dive in!
0:05 - That’s not at all what your username is displayed as.
0:18 - I consider Anime animation. There is no reason to single it out from animation from any other country other than Japan.
0:37 - And that’s not always a bad thing.
0:52 - Well, that’s what happens when you don’t pay attention. Also, this show does very much exist, so I am pretty sure it is canon.
1:01 - I think Kion is supposed to be younger than Kiara, though one source said he was older.
1:31 - Being brave, fast, strong, and having good eyesight does not qualify as having “powers”. It’s natural to have traits like those. Though at least these “powers” you speak of are not like the powers you see Sonic fans give their OC’s.
1:46 - Well, the movie was meant to be taken seriously and was made for audiences of all ages. This is just a show for little kids.
2:25 - Well, to be fair, a movie is supposed to be emotional and slower-paced, as opposed to a TV show where you can do it as many times as you want.
2:40 - Why is the clip sped up? Is that just to try to avoid copyright?
3:06 - Okay, I don’t wanna bore you guys, so I’m just gonna... Skip it! Skip it! (Skips to 3:45)
4:00 - Wait. Why are you showing this clip at normal speed if you played that other clip at double speed? Is there a reasoning behind your inconsistency? Also, he’s going to play this whole clip, which I’m sure you’ve all seen a million times, so... Skip it! Skip it! (Skips to 4:54)
5:00 - That was supposed to be an emotional part of the movie! *shows clip from the 101 Dalmatians episode, “Love ‘Em and Flea ‘Em”* Cadpig: Focus!
5:09 - *sigh* Here we go again! Skip it! Skip it! (Skips to 5:34)
6:00 - Dude, you need to chill out! Obviously, The Lion Guard was intended for a much different intended target audience than the Lion King movies. Plus, they had different writers. Not to mention, it’s a totally different generation. Hey, if people can tell me it’s perfectly fine to modernize 101 Dalmatians and have it be completely inconsistent with the original movie, than I should have every right to accept the contradict what this series is doing to the Lion King franchise.
6:30 - To be fair, that was more of a spiritual power than something like say Shadow the Hedgehog would pull off.
6:51 - Do my ears deceive me, or are you trying to impersonate Chris Rock? Well, to be fair, it is better than Wayne Brady’s impression of him.
7:25 - They wanted to focus on that one cub for that climax. Even if they did show that they had two cubs, it would make the movie feel even more like Bambi than it already is.
7:54 - It could be possible Kion and the rest of the Lion Guard were out trying to defend the Pridelands during that scene. That actually might be interesting if they made a Lion King 3 to have the Lion Guard as a sub plot.
8:06 - I already told you: Kion is younger than Kiara. Though I still don’t understand how he was able to lift her up on his shoulders in that one episode, but I digress.
8:18 - Actually, I think it’s a great addition to the franchise, and it’s rare for me to say something like that.
8:25 - You already said that enough times!
8:34 - OKAY! YOU HAVE PROVEN YOUR POINT! GOD!
Final Verdict: This Guy is just a total d!ck. He is taking a show that airs on a preschool network way too seriously. I can understand him not liking it for contradicting the franchise, but there’s another side to it. It can work if you want to see an untold side to the story. Like I said, it worked for 101 Dalmatians, so it can work for The Lion King as well. Also, you don’t have to keep slamming stuff into our faces all the time. The people who made The Lion Guard were not trying to ruin your childhood, nor were they trying to treat the new generation of kids like idiots. Some things like this can be forgiven. Though I still don’t understand why The Lion King 2 has so many fans; it seems to be one of the few Disney sequels that has gained a cult following. Anyway, you know how a lot of people like to make OC’s? Think of it that way. Only this one was done with more thought and effort, unlike those Sonic fanfics.
That’s all I gotta say about this. See ya later, guys.
|
|
|
Post by babclayman on Apr 13, 2018 11:16:25 GMT -5
In the case of which of the Lions is younger; Kion is younger than Kiara. The Show does explain, on numerous occassions, that while the First Born becomes the Ruler of the Pride Lands, the Second Born is the one, who leads the Lion Guard. That is why Scar was once the Leader of the Lion Guard, too. This is a point, they do explain on numerous occasions, in the Show.
Like you bring up, too; It is likely that the Lion Guard were busy doing some thing else, during the events of Lion King II. There has been an Episode, where they do help with migration, so it's possible they are doing that. Or, it shall likely be explained, what happens to the Lion Guard, later in the Show.
I do think the Show actually does a lot of World Building, for Lion King. It establishes the relationships between the other Animals, as well as showing up some representation, for Hyena's, with Jasiri's Clan! So, I do like the World Building, which the Show does. Even if it does air on Disney Junior, they are Okay with showing darker themes too; such as showing an Elephant's Body, who Simba is doing a Speech for. Season Two has also shown it's going to be darker, with the return of Scar, and one of the more recent Episodes shows him try to poison Simba, with a Scorpion.
In the case of; Lion King III, that is what Lion King I 1/2 is called, in the U K.
Do those help explain some issues, which the one who nit picks in the Video claims, Belchic?
|
|
|
Post by Flowgli on May 14, 2018 15:17:33 GMT -5
Greetings, people. Welcome to another session of the infernal court in Sparky’s 101 Dalmatians’ Commentaries. I’m Flo, your judge, jury, executioner, and guardian of so many spoiled brats who will take no more spoiled brats or crap from those that she already has.
The Internet is filled with so many people who are old enough to know better but act like immature, spoiled, whiny little brats. Not every single person on the Internet are like that, but a lot of people on the Internet are. Not only that, but there are also people on the Internet who are too young to understand how the Internet works and go on to make fools out of themselves without first being told what to expect and what not to expect from there anyway. I’ll be doing a commentary on someone who seems to be like that. Our next offender is Samantha’s story Productions. In this video of theirs that I’m gonna be commentating on, Samantha complains about the Caillou hate and tells people to stop it. Yeah, this person is one of those anti-haters, and I already dealt with one of those in Vinnie, whose video I commentated on got deleted. I’m guessing that he learned something from other people who criticized him and stayed off of YouTube afterwards until he’s actually ready to upload better content and take whatever criticism he would get for those like a mature, responsible user that he and everyone else is supposed to be. But getting back to Samantha, this video that I’m gonna be commentating on is all in text. This person never used their real voice in this video. In fact, they never used their real voice in any of the videos in their channel, as far as I know. But since the name of this YouTube channel carries a feminine name, I’ll refer to them as a female. I don’t even care if this person is really a female or a male pretending to be a female. Let’s get on with it and examine the case of “Stop the caillou hate!!!” Oh, and for the entirety of this commentary, when I mention Caillou, I’m referring to the character, because that’s what Samantha talks about in this video, though I will have to mention the show at some points.
0:04 - I got news for you, Samantha. People are not gonna stop the Caillou hate! People hate Caillou as much as they showed for a reason!
0:09 - And this is one of the biggest problems I have with people on YouTube. When they see other people expressing how they hate someone, they defend the people or characters being hated on by saying that those people or characters did nothing to the people who expressed their hate for them. Samantha, there are two things that you have to understand. One, Caillou is a whiny, spoiled brat who constantly whines to get his way and gets no consequences for exhibiting bad behavior. He may be just a four-year-old little kid, but even at that age, kids are supposed to know right from wrong! Kids at age four are supposed to know what’s expected of them when it comes to behavior. Two, Caillou didn’t even need to do anything to people to make them hate him. If anything, however, he has done something to little kids, which are who his show is aimed at. The show is an educational show for little kids, and all the little kids who have watched the show learned from by watching it was throwing tantrums and acting like brats until they get their way. That’s why people hate Caillou. So, next time, you better get your facts right before jump in and defend a person or character like that when they rightfully got hated on.
0:14 - As much as I hate GoAnimate, I think those videos involving Caillou getting punished, whether for good or stupid reasons, being made is for the best, and for two reasons. One, Caillou is so much of a spoiled brat that he deserves those punishments that his parents gave him. Two, these GoAnimate videos are jokes. They’re not meant to be taken seriously. They are made to make fun of Caillou and make people laugh. They are not child abuse. If you’re really gonna say that these GoAnimate videos on Caillou are child abuse, then chances are that you don’t even know what child abuse is.
0:19 - Just like the GoAnimate videos involving Caillou getting punished, the hate art towards Caillou that show characters from other shows hating him are jokes. Caillou may have done nothing to any of the characters from other shows shown in the crossover pics with him, but those pics are not meant to be taken seriously. They’re all just fan stuff, or “hater” stuff, expressing their honest thoughts on certain cartoon characters. These pics are gonna keep being made by people who hate Caillou if those people want, and they’re not gonna stop doing so just because you want them to. You’re just gonna have to accept that.
0:34 - That “theory” was meant to be an expression of how the person who posted that feel about Caillou. And Caillou gets food and love because he’s a little kid who is given it by his family just like any little kid should, no matter what any person who hates him says or feels about him.
0:39 - He still does have feelings. People just hate him for how whiny and bratty he is, making a fool out of himself with no shame and being a bad influence on little kids. And even though someone, real or fictional, has feelings, they have every right to be made fun of and bashed by a lot of people when that someone does something they know is stupid and wrong, especially in front of others, who will make fun of him because of that.
0:44 - People who make GoAnimate videos of Caillou getting grounded and make hate art of him are not gonna stop doing all this and just forget about him just because you want them to. They have every right to make stuff that rightfully make fun of him. If you’re really bothered by all this that makes fun of Caillou, then you are in no condition to be here on the Internet. But if you’re gonna be on the Internet, then you have to accept the fact that people are gonna make stuff that makes fun of things that rightfully deserve it and upload them here, especially if that thing being made fun of is a four-year-old bald-headed fictional character from an educational animated children’s show who acts like a spoiled brat and leads little kids to believe that it’s okay to behave that way. Don’t act like a baby about it.
0:50 - You know, if you call out haters of anyone or anything, you’re guaranteed to get a lot of hate for it. That’s not what you want, I believe, but that’s what you’re asking for, and you’re asking for it by making this video. You and all other anti-haters just couldn’t accept the fact that people have varying levels of how much they like or hate certain characters, certain people, or certain things. Not only that, but you failed to see the reason why people express hatred towards these things. You didn’t stop to think carefully enough, if at all, as to why people express hatred towards these things. People express hatred towards Caillou for very good reasons. Caillou is a whiny, spoiled brat who throws tantrums and cries for whines in an irritating, grating voice, all when he doesn’t get his way. He is the title character of an educational animated show aimed at little children, and in shows like that, title characters or main characters are expected to be made to be relatable, likable, and enjoyable without being annoying and cringeworthy. Characters like those in shows like those are expected to be someone that little kids can look up to and learn something good from, and Caillou is not a character like that. You failed so hard to realize this that you are hereby condemned to the Parent Curse. One day, you will have children who are exactly like you and Caillou. Good luck, you’ll need it. So, let it be recorded. This session of the infernal court in Sparky's 101 Dalmatians' Commentaries is now adjourned. *bangs gavel*
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on May 17, 2018 19:28:55 GMT -5
Hey, guys. Belchic here with another commentary. This is going to be a first for me because I am going to be commentating on a video that was literally just uploaded today! This video is made by one of my favorite YouTube channels dedicated to Disney theme parks: Offhand Disneyland. In this video, he talks about some abandoned attractions at the Disney parks. I enjoyed this video a lot upon my first viewing of it, but I found a lot of flaws in it that I felt needed to be addressed. I mean, I wouldn’t be commenting on it if it didn’t have any flaws. So without further ado...
*plays clip from “PAW Patrol”* Zuma: Let’s dive in!
0:19 - I gotta agree with you on that seeing how surprisingly popular buffalo wings have become lately.
0:41 - If I may ask, what exactly are we looking at here? Is this an abandoned area in Disney’s Animal Kingdom? Though knowing how Disney quizzes it’s fans, I’m sure that’s what they want you to think.
0:51 - *plays clip from the “101 Dalmatians: The Series” episode: “You Say It’s Your Birthday”* Spot: It happens!
1:35 - Probably not. Those are just temporary things for Pixar Fest. Though I have yet to see buffalo wings pop up in Disneyland.
2:03 - Future World is still there. Granted some attractions are closed to make way for new attractions, but it’s still very much there. Though it’s not the EPCOT from the 80’s anymore.
2:20 - An attraction doesn’t have to be an opening day attraction in order to be abandoned. Also, I was never testing you.
2:55 - And don’t forget General Knowledge.
3:25 - I saw that video. It’s amazing the the doors can be opened too.
3:36 - Still, it’s evidence that Disney can bring the attraction back.
4:12 - You Can’t. The simulators were removed in 2010.
4:20 - I don’t think gross is the right word to use for describing Body Wars. More like unnerving.
4:28 - Yes, it is.
4:47 - I remember seeing a video of someone’s friend taking a video of the abandoned Body Wars queue saying that you need to ask him for permission before using the video footage for anything. I don’t know if this is the same video, but if it is, I hope you got his permission.
5:05 - Like I said, the simulators were removed in 2010. Though rumor has it one still remains back there.
5:24 - Not gonna repeat myself.
5:48 - Everyone wants the PeopleMover to come back, but it’s not going to happen. The track is getting demolished this fall, sadly.
5:58 - It won’t return at all!
6:18 - Ah, there’s America Sings in the background there. Not sure if this video was made while it was still operating or not, but my money’s on no.
6:29 - There’s the Skyway! So obviously this video was from pre-November 1994. Granted, the PeopleMover did close shortly after that. Still, those are the 1987 vehicle designs, so it is very likely this was after America Sings closed.
6:39 - You don’t have to pay attention to know the track is still there! It sticks out like a sore thumb!
6:45 - Or below you.
7:06 - And that’s why it’s not coming back. Star Tours and the Star Trader have already blocked off any views of the tracks, so that should be a hint that it is never coming back.
7:28 - I pick America Sings since that was my favorite of the three. Interestingly enough, that one qualified as an abandoned attraction for quite a while during the time of the Disney Renaissance in the 90’s.
7:43 - No duh!
7:52 - Though it did run for twice as long as the Carrousel Of Progress, Which is pretty impressive, but there are multiple other reasons why it closed, but I don’t have time to list them all.
8:01 - Only from 1977-1995 though.
8:37 - Innoventions closed in 2015. It’s now called the Star Wars Launch Bay. Although, you are right to some degree. The building is rumored to be demolished and be replaced with something for the new Tomorrowland rumored to be coming sometime before 2025. Rumors speculate it might be replaced with the Tron Lightspeed Cycle Dash that’s in Shanghai Disneyland and that’s coming to Walt Disney World in a few years.
9:21 - Yeah. The GOOD ImageWorks.
9:52 - That’s just sad. Though nowadays, it feels more like the Anaheim Convention Center...Just without the D23 experience.
10:02 - I knew this was coming. Though I’m a little surprised you didn’t talk about Discovery Bay, which suffered a similar fate.
10:34 - And not to mention dangerous.
11:03 - Well, it’s better than nothing.
11:17 - You pretty much nailed them all. Though I might add the Motorboat Cruise.
11:27 - I would if I wasn’t having this issue with the bell icon that I can’t explain, but fortunately I already did before I started having this issue.
11:41 - And I’m gonna end the video right here, because the last 50 seconds are just of him saying “Thanks for watching, support my channel”, and all that jazz.
Well, overall, this was a very well-constructed video, but there were a few flaws in it that I felt needed to be addressed. Not much else to say there.
That’s all, folks!
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Jan 9, 2019 17:49:11 GMT -5
Hey, guys! Belchic here with my first commentary in a long time!
Some of you may remember a couple years ago, I stated that I was having trouble finding a good rant on “PAW Patrol” and “Martha Speak because every single one of them is exactly the same. Well, a few years have passed, and in the case of “PAW Patrol”, it hasn’t gotten any different. On the other hand, I just found this video that was a rant on “Martha Speaks”. It’s by a user named Sagwa Miao. Now, with a name like that, you would think this person would enjoy “Martha Speaks”, but no. She instead makes this video that is text only with no audio whatsoever ranting about how much she hates another preschool show. Now, the text in here goes by quick, so I gotta be quick to read it, but my commentary should be able to catch up with it. So using a clip from another preschool show, without further ado...
*plays clip from PAW Patrol* Zuma: Let’s dive in!
0:03 - Looks like we got a Mojo Jojo on our hands here!
0:06 - Well, to be fair, this show was made for young children, so if you’re eight or older, then of course you’re not going to like it unless you find some redeeming factors about it.
0:11 - Take cover! Here come the Nostalgia Critic fanboys with their flamethrowers!
0:18 - Then why were you even watching it in the first place if you hate it so much? Also, do you care to elaborate why it’s so horrible?
0:29 - If one of your favorite voice actors does voice work on a show that you hate, that does not mean it’ll instantly hurt their reputation. Voice actors have worked on a variety of different shows made for a variety of different age groups. I mean, look at Tara Strong for example. She’s worked on cartoons made for kids, preschoolers, AND adults! Voice actors agree to do voice work for money, not for popularity.
0:38 - Okay...Where do I begin with this. First of all, how is it a rip-off of all those shows? Just because they’re preschool shows that star talking animals? That’s kind of a stretch. Second of all, what do you mean “Sagwa” is your show? Are you implementing that you own that show? Third, how does the title of the show rip off Garfield? Seriously, how does “Martha Speaks” sound anything at all like “Garfield & Friends”? You gotta provide some facts to back up your argument, because I’m losing you here.
0:40 - Well, actually, its initial run was 2008-2014, so it really only ran for six years. Though this video was uploaded in 2016, and at the time, it was playing in reruns on PBS Kids. I don’t know if it’s still on anymore, but technically, it is canceled now.
0:45 - Like I said, it’s already canceled, so get over it.
0:50 - Here’s some advice: If you don’t like the show, DON’T WATCH IT!!! It’s simple as that! Just be thankful they weren’t shoving this show down your throat like Nickelodeon did with “Dora the Explorer”.
0:58 - Look, everyone is entitled to their own opinions. You are allowed to like and dislike whatever you want. The creators of “Martha Speaks” are not in any way, shape or form trying to tell you that you are only allowed to watch their show and nothing else. Nobody is forcing you to watch that show! Unlike SOME NETWORKS!
1:00 - Uh...I kinda see the connections it has to “Blue’s Clues”, but it’s not exactly the same as it. At least it feels more realistic and plot-driven, and the characters aren’t breaking the fourth wall trying to talk to the kids at home. There’s a lot of thing that differentiate those two shows.
1:13 - I will agree the animation is not the best. The characters do look like cardboard cutouts, I will give you that, but I still disagree with the fact that this show is trying to rip off “Clifford” or “Sagwa”. I suppose next you’re going to tell me “PAW Patrol” is a rip-off of “Top Wing”? Also, I’m going to say this one more time...IF YOU DON’T LIKE THE SHOW, THEN DON’T WATCH IT! NOBODY IS FORCING YOU TO!
And that’s the end of the video. Well, I think the best way to some up this person in a nutshell is...well, I’ll let Arthur Reed sum it up for me:
*plays clip from “Arthur”* Arthur: That’s a baby show!
Well, I don’t really have much to say about this rant other than the fact that she claims the be Sagwa the Siamese Cat and just rants about something she hates without providing any evidence and making connections to it that make no sense. This was a very uncrafted rant to say the least.
That’s all I gotta say on the matter. This is Belchic signing off, and I’ll see you all next time.
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Mar 26, 2019 16:54:08 GMT -5
Hey guys! Belchic here with another commentary for you wonderful people! Now, this commentary is going to be on a promotional video that was made about 20 years ago for an amusement park chain known as the Family Fun Center. Now, being that this video is from 1998, it is a little dated since some of the facts said in the video are a bit irrelevant by today’s standards. But the thing that bothers me the most about this video is that it feels a bit like a cluttered mess because it shows a lot of old movie clips that could leave the viewer very confused. I’m going to do my best to try to knock some sense into this video. So without further ado...
*plays clip from “PAW Patrol”* Zuma: Let’s dive in!
0:22 - Ah, yes. A great way to grab your viewers’ attention by showing a depressing scene from an old movie that I doubt any kids have even seen.
0:46 - What the hell are you trying to sell to me? These pop culture references are making no sense whatsoever!
1:04 - Oh, God! Don’t make me hit the skip button!
1:16 - Oh, so that’s what this is all about! What was with all the old movie clips? You could have at least shown some more universally-known stuff that kids would recognize like Scooby-Doo or the Looney Tunes.
1:32 - *plays the “Price is Right” failing horn*
1:45 - Well, showing clips from “Breakfast at Tiffany’s” or “The Ten Commandments” won’t do that.
2:03 - You’re already making me bored by showing all these old movie clips! And here you are saying you don’t want people to be bored? Talk about hypocrisy!
2:08 - Yeah, ALL AGES! That little clip you showed right there was VERY G-rated!
2:42 - Yes, there are quite a few locations, but not that many.
2:54 - Today, I’d say less than half of them do. At least all the ones in California have since been converted into a Boomers.
2:56 - Any restaurant named after a fictional character could be funny. You could call it “Mickey Mouse’s”, and it wouldn’t be much better.
3:11 - Looks may be deceiving.
3:34 - Wow. These people know more about their customers than I do about myself!
3:45 - *plays clip from “101 Dalmatians”* Spot: What is it with you guys and poultry?
4:01 - *plays clip from Nostalgia Critic* Nostalgia Critic: Take my cash!
4:07 - No...Really?
4:10 - And that’s the only time you will see the animatronics in one of the restaurants in this video.
4:23 - Wow! For once, they’re actually right this time! “Family FUN Center”!
4:34 - Hey, Travis. You wantq go to Disneyland with me today? **** that sh*t, man! I’m going to the Family Fun Center!
4:42 - Mini golf too? What have I been missing out on? How can this be any better?
5:02 - *plays clip from Nostalgia Critic* Nostalgia Critic: ...HA!
5:14 - *plays clip from “The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle”* Bullwinkle: Never said I could drive it well.
5:23 - Yeah, pretend you’re in the Cannonball Run!
5:31 - *plays clip from “Littlest Pet Shop: A World of Our Own”* Jade: You know how some things get funnier the more you say them? This isn’t one of them.
5:45 - *plays clip from “It’s Christmastime Again, Charlie Brown!” Peppermint Patty: *singing* And a partridge in a pear tree.
6:11 - Waste of good talent from John Wayne there.
6:25 - But not great advertising skills.
6:30 - And that’s why we show old movie clips that we doubt any kids would get the reference to.
6:49 - Half of those locations they listed no longer are accommodated by a Bullwinkle’s restaurant anymore today. In fact, a couple of them don’t even exist anymore. I know Anaheim doesn’t have one.
Final verdict: I’m sure the people who made this video meant well, but if you want to catch someone’s attention when advertising, throwing in random old movie clips will alienate most of your audiences, especially little kids who most likely will not know the movie. Pop culture references are fine if you want to be funny, just as long as they don’t make up a majority of your joke material. It’s like eating unhealthy food. It’s okay, but only in moderation. Think about that the next time you try to promote something.
That’s all I gotta say about the matter. This is Belchic signing off, and I need a better farewell to say to my fans.
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Jun 1, 2019 17:30:24 GMT -5
Hey, guys! Powerpup97 here with another commentary for you guys! This commentary is going to be on another rant on one of my favorite cartoons. This commentary is going to be on Bella Flaminco, who did this rant on “Corn & Peg” after she watched the pilot episode. So this commentary is going to be a little dated considering this was before the official air date, but I still find it worthy of a commentary. So without further ado...
*shows clip from PAW Patrol* Zuma: Let’s dive in!
0:11 - Quite a way to start us off by acting like we know what the deal is and sounding like you got cotton in your mouth.
0:31 - I look forward to hearing your reasons why you say that.
0:45 - And that’s a bad thing? Sounds like a good thing to teach preschoolers. Also, this is why unscripted rants are a bad idea.
1:00 - This is a classic trope that TV Tropes likes to call “Pink Girl, Blue Boy”.
1:15 - I don’t remember that personality trait of his being established. Maybe you’re confusing him with Feivel from the American Tail franchise. *plays clip from “An American Tail”* Feivel: But Tony, I can’t tell time!
1:21 - He’s not dumb! That’s pretty harsh!
1:35 - *plays clip from “Alice in Wonderland”* Queen of Hearts: GET ON WITH IT!!!
1:41 - *plays the “Price is Right” failing horn*
1:48 - *plays clip from “Kablam!”* Henry: No, she doesn’t.
1:53 - *crickets chirping*
2:06 - And we are all supposed to know who this Louie the Bunny character is?
2:14 - Considering they don’t match her fur color, I can kinda understand what you mean. But they do work. Albeit not very well.
2:27 - Uh-oh! Subliminal messages ahoy! Now, the Internet is never going to forget this! As if the debate about the Little Mermaid poster wasn’t bad enough.
2:35 - Thank you, fellow Pegasister, for pointing out the obvious.
2:40 - Yes, the show does have a lot of similarities to MLP, but it’s not like that’s forbidden!
2:43 - *facepalm* Oh, brother! This is another one of those Mad Lib style rants, isn’t it? Just for that, I’m gonna...
Skip it! Skip it!
*skips to 3:02*
3:06 - Yes, a group of six ponies who are all best friends and teach us about the importance of friendship want to destroy a different set of ponies who are also showing great signs of friendship. They don’t care that evildoers like Queen Chrysalis or Lord Tirek are out to destroy Equestria. Oh no! They’d rather destroy Corn and Peg, two fillies that they have absolutely no business with but would most likely get along great with if they ever did meet them!
3:15 - *shows clip from “Young Frankenstein”* Igor: Too late. I watch the show religiously, and I don’t find it a waste of time.
3:28 - Paw Patrol is not a waste of time either! It’s also a great show! You pretty much just listed all the current Nick Jr. shows. Obviously you’re one of those people who thinks they’re too old for preschool shows. Well, I respect that, but you shouldn’t boss people around telling them what they should or should not watch. If you don’t like the show, don’t watch it. Nobody’s forcing you to. Now, “Dora the Explorer”, that show is a waste of time!
Well, final verdict, this is just another generic ranter who does everything she can to make a cartoon she hates look bad in anyway she can. Though I’m not surprised she also brought up the fact that Corn & Peg was a My Little Pony rip-off. Well, maybe since My Little Pony is ending its production soon, it could be Nickelodeon wanted to create a spiritual successor to it. Ever think of that? I swear, some of the Bronies and Pegasisters are just as bad as any other fanboys. To me, it’s just the whole “Oh, Irate Gamer is an AVGN rip-off!” crap all over again. Seriously, you people need to get a life. We should be concerned about some more important things...like Alex Trebek being in a critical stage of cancer.
Anyway, that’s it for this commentary. This is Belchic signing off. (I really need a better closing statement!)
|
|
|
Post by Flowgli on Jun 7, 2019 13:33:20 GMT -5
Greetings, people. Welcome to another session of the infernal court in Sparky’s 101 Dalmatians Commentaries. I’m Flo, your judge, jury, executioner, and enchantress. Walt Disney Animation Studios has a great library of animated films that are so good that they are worth enjoying and remembering for generations, with the exception of a few films. Over the years, even after the Internet became a common thing, people have been coming up with theories regarding certain things in these films. There are some logical theories, and there are some downright nonsensical theories. I’ve been looking into some of these theories on YouTube, especially from our next offender, TheThings. TheThings is actually a group of people, even though in their videos, only one person’s voice can be heard, and that person is a woman. The content of the videos from TheThings are fan theories and top ten lists. The video from them that I’m gonna be commentating on is a fan theory, specifically about something from Beauty And The Beast, that explains why Belle should marry Gaston instead of the Beast. Now, when I first saw this video, I found it so stupid that as I put together this commentary, I left it in development limbo for a few months to rethink the things that happened in my life in terms of everything Disney-related. Usually, when I watch videos put out by TheThings, they are better than this. However, some of the videos that they have put out just show that they sometimes don’t have a clue as to what they are talking about, and this is one of those videos. So, let’s examine the case of “Belle Should Have Married Gaston In Beauty And The Beast And Here’s Why”. 0:11 - Sorry, but whatever reason you have as to why you think Belle should’ve ended up with Gaston instead of the Beast is not a good one, and as you continue on in this video, I’ll point out why Gaston is not the better choice for Belle. 0:53 - Gaston was a war veteran in only the live-action remake, and him thinking highly of himself is one of the reasons why he’s not the better choice for Belle. Nobody wants to be with someone who thinks highly of themselves. Anyone who thinks highly of themselves is egotistical, arrogant, big-headed, and thinks they’re better than anyone else. Who would want to be with someone like that? The Prince may have been like that at the very beginning of the story, but that was what got him and everyone in the castle put under the spell in the first place. After the spell was put in place, everything changed. 1:02 - That’s the only reason why Gaston wanted to marry Belle. He only wanted to marry her because she is the most beautiful girl in town. 1:18 - What I really have to comment here is that “subscribe” button. Why do you have that featured in the video as you continue speaking. It’s really distracting, couldn’t you have saved that for the end of the video? 2:24 - Sorry, but after hearing you explain the story, not that I myself don’t know it—but then again, who doesn’t know it at this point?—I am not convinced that Gaston isn’t that bad. There’s nothing redeemable about Gaston. Gaston only loves Belle for how beautiful she is, and that’s not a good enough reason to love someone or to want to marry them. 2:45 - Nothing pointed out by LeFou in the song “Gaston” is a trait good enough of Gaston’s in order to be counted as redeemable. So, he thinks he’s perfect and fights better than anyone else. Big deal. So, he can eat more eggs than anyone else. Who cares? That’s nothing. 3:14 - The Beast kept secrets from Belle for a reason. If the Beast is gonna have a good chance to break the spell, then it’s best for Belle to help break the spell without her knowing about it. While under the spell, the Beast is supposed to learn a lesson. He must learn to love someone and earn that someone’s love in return. The love between Belle and the Beast is supposed to be earned. It’s supposed to be natural, genuine, and for real. If the Beast tells Belle anything about the spell, especially about what the enchanted rose is for, then the breaking of the spell will be less likely to happen, making the love between Belle and the Beast forced, therefore making the attempt to break the spell come off as desperate. That’s not how it works. So, it’s best that Belle isn’t told anything about the spell. 3:25 - Yes, honesty is the best policy in any relationship, but what Gaston has shown to be honest about isn’t all that good. Sometimes, there are some things that one has to keep secret, just like the Beast keeping the spell a secret from Belle. Sometimes, secrets are kept for good reasons, and the Beast keeping the spell a secret from Belle is one of them. 3:42 - Now, while all that may be true about Gaston, Belle has clearly shown that she is not interested in him. She doesn’t love Gaston. If Belle ends up with Gaston, she wouldn’t be happy with her life by then. And what’s the point of marrying someone if they know they’re gonna end up unhappy with that person? Also, I must reiterate, Gaston only loves Belle for how beautiful she is. He doesn’t care for anything about Belle except for her looks. He doesn’t care about her mind, her interests, her dreams, or anything else about her. He only wants to marry her just for the sake of having the most beautiful girl in town as his wife. He only wants to marry her for selfish reasons. 3:49 - The castle probably wouldn’t be lonely and isolated if the Prince wasn’t spoiled, selfish, and unkind, which gave the Enchantress a reason to place the spell on there and everyone who lived in it. And the wolves probably weren’t even near the castle before the spell was placed, so they probably wouldn’t be there if the Prince hadn’t been spoiled, selfish, and unkind and ended up being placed under the spell for it. 3:57 - Again, Gaston is a former soldier in only the live-action remake. In the original animated version, a hunter is exactly what he is. He does seem to have the ability to protect Belle, especially from wolves, but he’s still not the best choice for her, and I already explained why. And when he hunts for animals, he does it for sport, which explains all the trophies he has mounted on his wall. 4:13 - Who cares if one is more good-looking than the other? Isn’t the whole point of Beauty And The Beast to learn not to judge others by how they look? Gaston may be a good-looking guy, but his personality is unattractive. The Prince may have an ugly personality, and it may show while he is a Beast, but as the story progressed, he went through a change in his personality for the better. He became kind and unselfish. He learned to love. And even though Gaston is a human and the Prince in the form of a Beast isn’t a human, the Prince was still a human first and was transformed into a Beast as punishment for his selfish behavior. Sure, Belle doesn’t know that, but that doesn’t change the fact that the Prince was a human first. 4:28 - True, the Beast wouldn’t be able do certain things himself because he doesn’t know how to do them, but that doesn’t mean he’s lazy. A prince still has responsibilities, even if those responsibilities don’t involve things like putting together a new bookshelf. But then again, the prince that we’re talking about is one who is spoiled at the beginning of the story, and he ended up being spoiled because everyone else in the castle just stood by and watched him become that way, which is why they were under the spell with him. At least that’s the case for the live-action remake, though it’s possible that that’s also the case for the original animated version. 4:38 - Gaston was still shown to be meaner than the Beast after the latter changed the way he behaved for the better, though. Who cares if Gaston hunts? 4:48 - Gaston probably wouldn’t refuse an old woman in need, but he is still not that much of a good person. While it was rude of the Prince to turn away the old beggar woman—who was really an enchantress—while it was very cold outside, I doubt that Gaston would care for any old woman he would take in. For all we know, he could just show how caring for old women he supposedly was just for the sake of looking good in front of everyone else in the village and still be admired by them. 5:13 - Whether or not Belle wants someone who wants her, she does not want Gaston, and Gaston only wants her because she is beautiful. Why would anyone want someone who wants them for just that? Besides, Gaston could be moving too fast. I mean, how much time do you think he spent getting to know much about her? From what was seen of and heard from him, he didn’t take that much time. The Prince may not have been interested in finding love at first—or maybe he did, but he found it hopeless, since he believed that no one would ever learn to love a beast—but when Belle took her father’s place as the Prince’s prisoner and promised that she would stay in the castle, all that changed. Belle showed the Prince that his bad attitude is intolerable, and from that, the Prince acknowledged that he needed to improve his behavior in order to be worthy of the love that he’s been seeking. 5:25 - Well, people can say that Maurice was trespassing in the Beast’s castle, but because of what time period the movie takes place in, and because he was lost in the cold and had no other place to go to, especially after Phillippe ran off without him, it is appropriate that the Beast should be hospitable and let him have a proper stay there for the night. When the Beast locked Maurice in the dungeon, the Beast still didn’t learn to love, and he still didn’t have any hope of earning love in return and having the spell broken. And Belle didn’t get locked up in a dungeon by the Beast; she was given a nice room to stay in after the Beast felt bad for her after he sent Maurice away from the castle without letting her say “goodbye” to him first. Also, it’s wrong to call the wolves “evil”. The wolves are just wild animals that were just doing what’s in their nature. 5:33 - Up until Maurice came into the castle, the Beast didn’t have anyone come there after the Enchantress cast the spell on the castle and everyone who lived in it. No one has ever shown or told him what he needed to do when someone comes in there. No one has told him at that point what he should do or shouldn’t do, so how was he supposed to have learned anything from the Enchantress after the spell was put in place by her when he wasn’t told by the other residents of the castle what he should do or shouldn’t do when someone comes in there? 5:38 - The Beast never showed any concern that Maurice would tell people about him. The Beast still let Maurice go, though, because Belle gave him her word that she would take her father’s place as his prisoner. The Beast agreed to let Maurice go when Belle promised to stay in the castle. And when Maurice told Gaston and the other townspeople at the tavern about the Beast, they didn’t believe him and think he was crazy anyway. 5:43 - Yes, imprisoning people is not a good start to a healthy relationship, but like I said, the Beast was never told after the spell was cast what he should do or shouldn’t do when someone comes in the castle. 5:52 - The Beast was filled with anger when Belle refused to come to eat dinner with him, so he was left with no choice but to let her starve. Just before this happened, he was finally told by Lumière, Cogsworth, and Mrs. Potts what he should do or shouldn’t do in order for him to have a good chance with Belle, but those efforts seem to have gone to waste when Belle kept refusing to join the Beast for dinner, which ends up infuriating him. 5:59 - Actually, you didn’t prove anything that Gaston probably isn’t all that bad. You just provided a theory with a big hole in it. 6:21 - Okay, no matter how interesting you try to make your “history lesson”, it’s not gonna change a thing for me. If anything, you trying to make it more interesting only makes me less interested in it. And I don’t want to hear you bring up historical accuracies regarding France and the time period the movie takes place in, because Beauty And The Beast is not only a movie, and it’s not only a Disney movie, but it’s also a fairy tale! Do you really think it makes any difference if you or anyone else brings up any historical accuracies to this? No! So, I’m gonna skip this part of the video, because I don’t want to hear you bring up historical accuracies to a fairy tale. *skips to 8:38* 8:49 - The Beast isn’t real? Are you saying that the Beast is just a figment of Belle’s imagination? I’m sorry, but I don’t buy that. I mean, the Beast is there in the flesh right before the eyes of Belle, Maurice, and Gaston. They all saw what he does, they all spoke to him and heard him speak to them, they felt him and what he does to them. They all knew he was there! And even though you said that this does not apply to the live-action remake, you did bring up the live-action remake on other points you made earlier in this video. 9:00 - No, it isn’t. That just sounds stupid. 9:16 - Just because the Beast and Gaston have some similarities to each other, especially the ones that you just pointed out here, doesn’t mean that they are the same person. So, no, this theory is not an important one to understand. 9:35 - I still call bullsh*it on that theory. Belle saw and heard the Beast and Gaston as two different people, which are what the Beast and Gaston actually are. She didn’t imagine Gaston as the Beast. She knows that the Beast and Gaston existed as two different people. 9:53 - She didn’t imagine any of this! All this that she saw and heard from both the Beast and Gaston is real! And Belle is different from all the other people in that town she lived in. She has a mind of her own, and she knows how to use it. She knows that going against how marriages were done in the time period that this movie takes place in is right. She is the smart Disney Princess, after all. 10:44 - All that’s just plain ridiculous! Everything that happened there wasn’t some story that Belle had put together in her head; it all happened in front of and around her and other people! 10:47 - No, I don’t. But then again, who does? 11:12 - Well, I’m glad that this video is over. I couldn’t take another second of this video. It’s just nonsense, and it just shows that you have no understanding of what makes the relationship between Belle and the Beast work. Now, I have a message for everybody. Not just everybody at TheThings, but everybody making fan theories, especially regarding animated Disney films. Before you even think about making fan theories or continuing to do so, you must have a great understanding of these movies and what makes them so good and beloved by many people for generations. Watching them from beginning to end is not enough. And no, watching them a lot of times is not enough, either. You have to actually pay very close attention to what’s going on, what’s being said, and how things are being done when you watch these movies. I mean, forget about the plot holes in the animated version that the live-action version made an attempt to fix, as they weren’t really that big of a deal, to begin with, and they are irrelevant to the events of the movie that are actually important. You people at TheThings better learn something from this, do some serious thinking about any more fan theories you plan to make in the future, and make sure you have a better understanding of the subjects you make videos on and what makes said subjects so good and beloved by many people for generations, and that everything you say about them makes sense. Until then, you are condemned to be transformed into outdated electronic devices. So, let it be recorded. This session of the infernal court in Sparky’s 101 Dalmatians’ Commentaries is now adjourned. *bangs gavel*
|
|
|
Post by babclayman on Jun 7, 2019 15:47:42 GMT -5
I am actually wondering, if that Channel only did the Video for the Click Bait Title?
I can not see how any one could see “Beauty & The Beast” and not see the many reasons as to why Belle should NOT be with Gaston.
Like you bring up; What Belle wants is to have some one understand her for her mind! Gaston is a Hunter, and so Gaston sees Belle as nothing more than another one of his Trophies! In his first conversation with Belle, he shows the idea of a Female using her mind is ickie to him! Belle would not want to be in a relationship with some one, who tries to discourage her using her mind!
However, with Beast, he actually appreciates Belle for who she is and for her mind! When Beast wants to do some thing for her and learns that she likes Books, he gives her his entire library! Both Belle & The Beast are actually able to bond over feeling like out casts! The two are also able to bond over reading, as it allows them to escape from what they feel trapped in!
On the case of Maurice, do the ones who made the Video above not remember that Gaston Bribed the Asylum to lock Maurice up, with the intent to BLACK MAIL Belle in to marrying him! When Beast locked Maurice up, it was cause he over reacted to what he considered to be Maurice trespassing in the Castle, not as part of some plan to force Belle in to marrying him! However, Beast then actually learns to better himself, the more time he spends with Belle! If we are going by the “Live Action” Film, too; when Beast actually learns about what happened to Belle’s Mother, he apologises for what he did with Maurice! Mean while, in the “Live Action” Film, Gaston tries to k!ll Maurice, to get to Belle, and then when Maurice is rescued and tells the Town what Gaston tried to do, Gaston tries to have Maurice committed to cover up his crimes!
Later in both versions the Film, when Gaston tries to have Maurice committed, Beast shows concern about what is happening to Maurice and then lets Belle go to rescue him, even when he Knows that doing so may have it so he’s a Beast forever, cause of how much he cares for her!
So, when it is between… Beast; Who learns to love and respect Belle for who she is and puts what he feels is best for her before his own needs. Or Gaston; Some one who sees Belle as nothing more than a Trophie and tries to Black Mail her in to marrying him…
I honestly have to question; What Film were they watching to get the view that the Video title implies!?
Do you think the Video was just made for Click Bait Value, Flo?
|
|
|
Post by Flowgli on Jun 7, 2019 16:24:15 GMT -5
I don’t think that the video was made for clickbait. It sounds like the people behind the video were honest about what they were talking about. I’m glad to see you add on to my points on the subject of the video.
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Apr 11, 2020 0:00:32 GMT -5
Hey, guys! Belchic here with another commentary. Today, I’m going to do another commentary on the AVGN. This one is going to be on the Amiga CD32. Why? Because I can! So without further ado...
*plays clip from PAW Patrol* Zuma: Let’s dive in!
0:11 - Okay, was it really necessary to Photoshop your eyes like that? It looks creepy!
0:32 - And what does BM stand for?
0:55 - It’s happened before. It even happened to Sega!
1:25 - Sounds a lot like the plan for 101 Dalmatian Street! Except, that show’s US release eventually did happen. Thank the Lord for that!
2:02 - So the PS4 costs $175? That’s actually an average price for any video game console. Heck, that’s even cheaper than Action 52!
2:08 - Wow! Even the Sega Genesis was cheaper than Action 52!
2:23 - Or worse: the Corona Virus!
2:29 - Seriously? Those weren’t even plugged in? And why would you even put another console on top of a Nintendo 64 anyway?
3:01 - This must be what an AVGN episode would be like if it were made like a Pixar short.
3:09 - What a faulty design!
3:14 - Literally, if you’re talking about the girl on the cover!
3:52 - Were you really expecting that thing to work?
4:08 - Now that’s a flaw that I’ve never heard of!
4:18 - Something tells me that paint can is empty.
4:41 - Well, the Playstation consoles used symbols for the buttons on their controllers, but looking at this...what planet did that come from???
4:46 - Makes sense because it’s red.
4:52 - You say that about just about every fighting game that you’ve ever reviewed.
5:20 - Do any of them have names? Are you even reading the names, or are you deliberately cutting them out from our perspective?
5:51 - Because it was made by a dying company.
6:04 - Which one?
6:17 - They were probably trying to rip off the Sega Genesis. But at least they were being honest about it, unlike the Atari Jaguar.
6:50 - Apparently that’s what they did with Action 52.
7:10 - Sounds like it came from an old phone.
7:17 - Alternate titles at their finest.
7:46 - Imagine combining that with the demos of Metal Gear and Ghostbusters 2!
8:05 - Are you sure that’s what it is?
8:15 - I have no comment.
8:36 - WTF?
8:52 - That is pretty much what they look like, even though you have referenced Back to the Future a lot in your reviews.
9:01 - Isn’t this the same as the game that you just reviewed?
9:19 - But it also reminds me of Stack Up, and we all know how much that game sucks.
9:32 - Looks Japanese, even though this console was never released in Japan.
10:02 - *plays Nostalgia Critic clip* NC: WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT?
10:37 - This looks familiar, but I’m not sure what it reminds me of.
10:45 - Smak? What kind of word is that for a gun sound?
11:11 - Yeah. Kind a like that Noah’s Ark game on Nintendo by Konomi. And no, I am not talking about Bible Adventures, or Super Noah’s Ark 3D.
11:35 - Fair enough.
11:46 - Erm...What kind of beaver jokes are there to say?
12:05 - *plays clip from a Rolling Stones music video* Mick Jagger: *singing* All I see is doom and gloom!
12:17 - Except I can’t hear the music because your voice is drowning it out.
12:24 - Makes sense.
13:28 - *plays clip from Animaniacs* Slappy: Well, that was pointless.
13:42 - Wouldn’t surprise me in the least.
13:52 - I guess this really is the meat of the matter.
14:23 - It’s like a sh*tty version of Dig-Dug.
14:39 - What do you mean everybody? Are you suspecting Oscar might have been the mascot, or all the characters from all the other games?
14:54 - Is there a reasoning behind that? Do you know the significance of the number 69?
15:08 - I think that’s the best way to describe him.
15:27 - Except those were good games.
15:59 - So would I, honestly.
16:08 - And you expect us all to know what Angel of Darkness is?
16:17 - Looks more like a crappy Sega Genesis game based on a gorey cartoon.
17:16 - So does that make this the only movie based game on the Amiga CD32?
17:25 - Maybe, but all the games you reviewed pretty much sucked.
17:34 - That’s actually a good question.
17:47 - Okay, this is a long part, so I’m just gonna... SKIP IT! SKIP IT!
*skips to 21:24*
21:32 - At least it works better than Shaq Fu.
21:52 - Because they’re greedy bastards trying to steal your money.
22:16 - Wow! That is not normal! I would’ve thought the game had crashed too!
22:31 - The company’s logo is on the ball, and the music sounds like Mega Man X fused together with “Touch and Go” by the Cars.
23:02 - Couldn’t have said it better myself.
23:11 - Dang! Imagine having to deal with that after waiting for all that time!
23:35 - Fortunately, that was in the instruction manual!
24:02 - The hell it’s not! Like trying to get something on the computer to work by jumping through a lot of hoops!
24:14 - I’m listening.
24:43 - *takes a few deep breaths*
25:07 - Those games don’t exist. You made those up back in 2007!
25:14 - So this goes beyond Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde or even Hong Kong ‘97?
25:46 - Speaking of Hong Kong ‘97! Also, are you sure that’s a kangaroo skeleton? I guess I’ll take your word for it. Though after the wildfires we had in Australia recently, that’s probably too soon.
25:59 - *plays the Price is Right failing horn* Another joke like that? Cut me a break!
26:17 - Well, considering the history you told us behind the Amiga CD32, I’m willing to bet nobody grew up with it.
26:20 - *plays clip from Ghostbusters* Zuul: ZUUUUUL! No, but seriously, how can you keep going with this review after showing us Kang Fu??
26:25 - So this game predates that?
26:41 - So does that mean you’re going to revise your Top 10 Worst Consoles? I recommend removing the 32X in favor of this console.
26:50 - Oh! So I guess The Lion King makes perfect sense now!
27:33 - Ah, the music from that game! How appropriate for this moment!
28:24 - Yeah. Unfortunately, the video ends on a cliffhanger right there.. It was basically the game file on the CD, which doesn’t work. So what? All the PS1 games were like that, so why bother putting that warning on there.
In conclusion, I don’t really know what else to say. I’ve pretty much said everything I need to say about this review. Anyway, see ya later, dudes!
|
|