|
Post by babclayman on Oct 9, 2014 7:17:56 GMT -5
Also, a case I also note is, one needs to note when something is humour or serious too, Belchic. ^^" May I ask, with the lines you mention, you see those as Serious or Humour? o.o
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Oct 9, 2014 10:52:43 GMT -5
Like I said, there are people on the Internet who are going to take things people say very seriously, regardless if it was intended to be a joke or not. There are people who are more sensitive than others, you know. I am aware that some of the stuff Jerry said was supposed to be a joke, but I actually was offended by some of the things he said as well.
By the way, bab, I sent this commentary to you 2 or 3 times via PM for you to proof read and give me feedback, yet you never did it, but now that I post it here publicly (which I admit was taking a shot in the dark), now you proof read it and tell me what I did was wrong?
Please, bab, could you just for once respect my opinion?
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Oct 24, 2014 23:42:19 GMT -5
Hey, everyone. Belchic here with yet another commentary for you guys. You know, I love the PAW Patrol. It's quite possibly the best Nick Jr. show ever made. You would think with a show with such high popularity, there would be a great deal of merchandise. Well, it does have its share of toys, and you would think the way people deal with those toys, the way a consumer would use it could vary depending on the age. Any little kid would play with it and have fun, while an adult would have it for collector's purposes. Well, this fact seems to have remained true, that is until I found this YouTube channel called "Toy Reviews For You" who did a review of the Paw Patrol Lookout Playset. I don't know how old this woman is, but a lot of the stuff she says is very immature and is unloyal to the series. Watching this video kind of makes me a little embarrassed to be a Paw Patrol fan. Well, anyway, to quote Zuma... *plays Paw Patrol clip* Zuma: Let's dive in! I think I'll use that clip to open all future commentaries of mine from now on. 0:09 - Yeah, you'd better look out for this Playset! It might make you start acting like this person. 0:17 - Like we care. 0:22 - *plays clip from "Toy Story"* Mr. Potato Head: Ages 3 and up! It's on my box! Ages 3 and up! I'm not supposed to be babysitting Princess Drool! 0:26 - *plays clip from "My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic"* Fluttershy: Yay. 0:53 - Does it actually work like a telescope? 1:12 - Honestly, I would not get that excited over a fire pole. In fact, I don't think anybody would. 1:20 - Mmmmm...Got nothing on that one, folks. 1:27 - It would be nice if you showed yourself next to it just so we could get an idea of how big it is. You ever heard of size-comparison? 1:46 - You could have just left your hand there instead of moving it all the time. Talk about a waste of energy. 1:52 - ...Don't ever do that again! 2:08 - Apparently the only emergency they have involves a train. Oh, by the way, what you're looking at is only half of the lookout. I understand it's a kid's toy, but if it was the real lookout, it would be sawed in half. 2:11 - Hey, what do you know? Marshall is actually first this time! 2:23 - In what way? 2:33 - Elevators are not cute! 2:38 - Didn't Ryder...oh, I don't know...BUILD the lookout? I seriously doubt Ryder acts that childish! 2:45 - Wait a minute. Isn't that supposed to be the elevator the pups use to change into their uniforms? Awkward! 3:34 - Actually, the other one is a bit smaller. Just has a much bigger backpack. 3:55 - Don't they see each other every day? This really gives me a suspicion that you didn't actually watch the show...or at least not enough episodes to do it justice. 4:26 - Wow. And there are people on the Internet who think I'M a Manchild! This girl makes AKnotholeResident look like an insurance salesman! 4:35 - Ladies first. 4:41 - Okay, I admit that was pretty fast. Usually toys get stuck going down those kinds of slides. 4:53 - Apparently they go so fast your camera couldn't keep up with them. 5:00 - He even crashed just like he does on the show. 5:10 - Ryder wouldn't go down that slide. Maybe on this Playset, but on the show, the slide was made specifically for those pups. Heck, Chase could barely fit in the tube! 5:19 - *plays "Price is Right" failing horn and facepalms* 5:38 - You're overdoing it. 5:48 - It's not like the toys have a mind of their own! Also, have you actually watched the show? 5:58 - Gee, does that periscope look familiar? *plays "Yellow Submarine" by The Beatles* We all live in a Yellow Submarine.6:07 - I don't even know how he'd get up there! There's no way he'd let Skye take him up there. 6:21 - Okay, this is just sad how you are reviewing this toy. I can understand if it's for very young children, but if you're trying to make a professional review, you are failing horribly! 6:29 - I'm sure the 3-7 range would. 6:32 - If you do, then please try to stick to the formula of the show! I swear this reminds me so much of that one kid who did that video where he took his Mario toy to Disneyland, and he didn't act at all like Mario. 6:50 - Well, I won't be here for that. Final verdict: despite how cool that Playset looked, Sarah's review was completely immature. I mean, I understand you're trying to be cute in making the characters talk and all, but if you're gonna do that, then at least try to stick to their personalities. To be fair, I will say she was reviewing a kids toy, so if she was only pretending and trying to talk to kids ages 3-7, that's excusable, but if she was being serious and trying to talk to my age group, then she's just being a manchild...or womanchild if you will. Well, on the bright side, it could have been a lot worse. *shows Christian W. Chandler clip* ChrisChan: JUULAAAAAAAAYYYYYY! Anyway, this is Belchic signing out, and I will see you all next time.
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Dec 7, 2014 12:58:34 GMT -5
Hey guys! Belchic here with another commentary for you guys.
Hey, do you know what one of my favorite games on the NES is? Sure, I do love solid classics like Mario, Zelda, Mega Man, you name it. But as surprising as this may sound, I've always had a heart for MC Kids. Now, don't get me wrong, the game is not perfect by any means, but we all are enlightened to our own opinions, right? Well, I found this game reviewer named Transparency Productions who did a review on the game, and it's aggravating on so many levels. So without further ado...
*shows clip from "PAW Patrol"* Zuma: Let's dive in!
0:05 - Okay, from the word, go, there are already a couple problems with this: 1. Don't talk during a fade-in, otherwise, we may miss some of what you're saying. 2. You're talking too fast; I can't understand a word you're saying. 3. Slamming the cartridge up in our face like that is kind of annoying.
0:16 - Did you really have to look back at the cartridge several times to get all that info you needed? It doesn't take that long to figure out all that information; it's not an Einstein project. Also, do you think the kid on the cartridge is actually going to talk back to you?
0:35 - Okay, I'm gonna go out on a limb here. I'm just going to assume that was supposed to be a joke. I would say something else, but I made similar comments in a previous commentary, and people have argued over the fact that those were supposed to be a joke, but i ridiculously digress; next.
0:48 - Eh...No comment.
0:52 - God, this guy is so annoying!
1:02 - Correct me if I'm wrong, but is that music from Mega Man X?
1:12 - What has come of this generation? It seems whenever anyone thinks about McDonald's these days, they usually think about obesity and crack. Isn't that a little extreme?
1:18 - I guess clowns are people too.
1:29 - I'm guessing you've never seen any of the McDonald's adverts or at least don't remember them, seeing that you don't remember any of the characters' names.
1:40 - *plays Nostalgia Critic clip* Nostalgia Critic: That's a ****. Deal with it.
1:51 - Yeah, it's just your copy, because I've never had that problem.
2:15 - I think there's plenty of variety.
2:27 - Well, according to the manual, those enemies are called "Goforit", so I'm assuming they're gophers. Though I find it weird that they don't live in holes, oddly enough. Stranger still, they're the most recurring creature in the game.
2:32 - I agree. That was a letdown.
2:48 - That was so funny I forgot to laugh.
3:05 - You forgot to mention the cryptic super jump move, which a lot of gamers don't know about unless they read the manual.
3:27 - Same case goes for Mario 2. The hit detection isn't perfect in that game either, and the plants don't regenerate.
3:41 - Thank you, Nintendo fanboy, for pointing out the obvious.
4:05 - That's not necessarily a bad thing. It adds some challenge to the game and gives it more replay value. Plus, it makes you think and gives you a better reason to explore the levels. If this wasn't part of the game, it would be too easy.
4:17 - I always thought it kind of sucked that you had to do that in order to get the card in the first level of the game. Talk about a beginner's trap. Nobody's going to know to do that the first time playing it.
4:35 - *plays clip from the MLP:FIM episode, "Luna Eclipsed"* Princess Luna: Pardon me for not expressing my enthusiasm.
4:41 - Geez! Will you stop showing that? Are you trying to make people sick or something?
4:47 - After looking back at that game footage, I think I'll need a second opinion. Everest, what did you think of the game? *plays clip from the PAW Patrol episode, "The New Pup"* Everest: Mmm-mmm! Yum-a-licious! Yeah, that's what I thought.
4:59 - Pfft! *laughs* I'm not sure if delicious is the best word to describe a McDonald's cheeseburger. Granted, I would call them delicious, but compare that to a restaurant-quality burger you'd get at Red Robin or someplace like that. If you choose McDonald's over that, you'd might as well be eating out of the garbage!
5:10 - *plays clip from "You Know What's Bullsh*t"* Bullsh*t Man: You know what's BUUUULLLLLLLLLLLLLsh*t? This review! Seriously, it's so unprofessional.
5:15 - Talking with your mouthful. Very professional.
5:21 - What are you talking about? The burger or the paper it came in? Because if it's the latter, you should feed it to the waste baskets. *plays clip from an old McDonald's commercial* Waste Baskets: *singing* Don't forget to feed the waste baskets.
5:26 - Oh, so you're an attention wh0re now?
5:31 - *plays clip from the 101 Dalmatians episode "Animal House Party"* Spot: Thank you for sharing.
5:37 - Repetition at its finest.
Well, final verdict: This had to be the most annoying, most unprofessional, and most scattered review of MC Kids I have ever seen! I understand if you're not a big fan of the game, and I understand if you're trying to be funny, but sometimes one can go too far to the point where it gets annoying. If you're going to make a review of something, I understand wanting to be entertaining, but there is a balance between being entertaining and being informative and professional. Being too informative will make the video boring, but being too entertaining will make the video annoying, and people will thumb down your video, leave butt-hurt comments on your channel and make commentary after commentary on your video, and ultimately, you will lose subscribers (which is something all YouTubers care about for some reason). So just take some advice from professionals if you don't want this kind of stuff to happen.
That's it for this commentary. Good night everybody.
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Jan 19, 2015 18:37:37 GMT -5
Hey! What's up, guys? Belchic here, and it's time for another commentary.
Today, I'm going to take a look at a rant made a few years ago by one of my favorite commentators on YouTube: ShadowStar1224. In this video, he makes a rant about Sonic fanboys. Now I'm not talking about the ones who make recolors; those are a completely different species. I'm talking about the ones who rant about the games for illogical reasons, kinda like AKnotholeResident, whom Flo did a commentary on once. Well, ShadowStar's rant here does bring up a lot of good points, but there are also some parts in here that I feel the need to comment on. So without further ado...
*shows clip from "PAW Patrol"* Zuma: Let's dive in!
0:08 - I would think a lot of fan brats would want to pay $1 billion dollars for his name, especially the girls who want to marry him!
0:17 - Part of the reason is because they're no longer an independent game company.
0:31 - Yeah, that's not a good reason. That's more of an ad homonym opinion.
0:44 - Okay, that comparison was totally irrelevant to your argument.
0:58 - Lame excuse. "It sucks" is not a reason to hate something.
1:11 - OMG! U SUK! (sarcasm)
1:29 - That's just what I need from you: a threat.
1:41 - Okay, is this the reason why you like 3D sonic games? Then why are you showing screenshots from a 2D Sonic game? Also, is it just me, or do those last two pics look like they were modified in MS Paint?
2:00 - Oh, that's a smart idea: Using "Shadow the Hedgehog", another game that has a bad reputation with a lot of gamers, as an example to backup your argument. I'm not bashing your opinion, but showing an example of a game that gets a lot of hate to prove something good is a huge risk.
2:26 - Umm...why are you showing footage from "Sonic Adventure"? Or is that "Sonic '06?" I know the former's first level was a beach that looked exactly like that."
2:47 - Tell me about it. I'm kind of ashamed to admit the first time I played "Mike Tyson's Punch Out", I lost to Glass Joe. No kidding.
2:57 - I didn't learn what it meant until 2nd grade.
3:10 - I'm with ya!
3:16 - So ratings = badness according to most people? Yeah, I get what you're saying. It's like those moviegoers who rely too much on Rotten Tomatoes or the restaurantgoers who rely to much on Yelp! Heck, I know a lot of Disney fans who hate "The Black Cauldron" just because of how well it did. I personally thought that movie was awesome, and I thought it was a pretty ambitious move for Disney to try something different at the time.
3:36 - Maybe some people do, but they're not used to having guns in Sonic games.
3:50 - Okay, that long pause you just made: That is exactly how I would have responded to that! You truly hit the nail on the head there! You deserve a cookie! *plays a clip from "Pound Puppies"* Cookie: Say what, now? Oh, sorry, Cookie.
4:09 - Ah, yes. I remember him. One of the first ranters I ever subscribed to. I must say he was a true Sonic fan and always knew what he was saying, even though he screamed a lot. It's a shame he left YouTube forever, and as far as I know, none of his videos exist anymore.
4:29 - The most important aspect of a game is being able to play it. Also, people will have different opinions on different games.
4:47 - I will say in my own defense that I don't hate Sonic Adventure 2. I just don't like it as much as its predecessor.
4:59 - Sounds kinda like me. I'm a huge Dalmatian fan. I love the animated movie but hate the live action movie. Does that make me a psycho? Well, according to some people I know, it does.
5:31 - I will say that exact same game was made for the Game Gear. It was actually the best-selling game on the Game Gear, and I think every one came pre-packaged with it. I've played it, and I must say, I agree with everything that you talked about! It's impossible to get passed the FIRST BOSS OF THE GAME!
6:17 - I haven't played any of the Super Monkey Ball games, so I don't know what you're talking about, but I'll take your word for it.
6:38 - I suppose we might see characters from that game in the next Super Smash Bros. game.
6:50 - How can you tell if someone is watching your video or not? Also, counting to 5 million could take a really long time!
6:59 - Actually, it'll take about 73 days.
7:12 - Sounds like you've been taking inspiration from Jordan Hembrough.
7:24 - Okay, if you're going to show video clips, don't put your voice over it unless it's mute...especially when the volume of the video is at the same level as your voice!
7:45 - Mario games always seem to be instant hits with everyone no matter what they are...unless of course they were made by Phillips or if Luigi was the star.
7:55 - And yet another franchise I know nothing about, so I can't comment.
8:07 - *shows clip from "Hotel Mario"* Mario: No.
8:26 - The only boycott I have about Sonic 4 is that when Episode 2 became available, I couldn't find it in the Wii Store for some reason.
8:37 - What? That's it? The video ends right here? Man, talk about anti-climatic! It sounded like you had more to say but got cut off. There was no conclusion or anything. I guess ShadowStar is too good for stuff like that. You are a man among men. You should be proud. And yes, I got that from youngbloodfantasy91! Deal with it!
Well, final verdict, I agree with most of ShadowStar's arguments, and I respect his opinion, but I felt I needed to make a few arguments myself because I felt there were some things he didn't quite get. Also, the long pauses make the video quite boring, so if you're going to do rants and commentaries try to develop some emotion and script your videos. It really helps.
|
|
|
Post by Flowgli on Jan 26, 2015 11:49:52 GMT -5
Here I am with another commentary. This one is on Guptill89. Belchic did a commentary on Guptill89's video of the Top Ten Hottest Females in the Sonic The Hedgehog franchise. Even though Guptill89 is known for that one video, he is also known for his Rant-A-Wreck videos, and in those videos, he made rants about minor things that nobody makes a big deal about. Just like the video of the Top Ten Hottest Females in the Sonic The Hedgehog franchise, These Rant-A-Wreck videos have been commentated on by a lot of people on YouTube. I will be commentating on one of those Rant-A-Wreck videos. Yes, these videos are old and commentated on by other people, and even Guptill89 is old news, but that doesn't mean I can't look back at it and give my thoughts on it. And I know what I'm gonna say is not gonna make any difference, but I just can't help but bring this to the forum. This is Guptill89's Rant-A-Wreck video on certain game reviewers, and I'm gonna skip the intro on that video and just get right into that rant.
*skips to 0:36*
0:58 - So, you think people who show "complete lack of thoughtfulness", as you put it, when they review video games is a bigger problem than bullies, drugs, and children who are hard to control? I think it's the other way around. Bullies, drugs, and children who are hard to control are bigger problems than people who show "complete lack of thoughtfulness" when reviewing video games. These video game reviews are really nothing to make such a big deal out of.
1:10 - Some people don't use a script or take any notes on what they're going to say in their video game reviews because they don't need to; they can think about what they're going to say over and over, and they can memorize it all. One of the people who commentated on this particular video of yours, Blaze the Movie Fan, said that he doesn't use scripts or write down any notes for his videos and doesn't need to because he likes to speak his mind.
1:20 - What you're describing there, Guptill, is a Let's Play. There's a difference between that and a review. A Let's Play is when you show a video game being played from start to finish. A review of a video game is when you talk about the game and things in it that people watching should be aware of as you play it; you really don't need to play a game from start to finish to make a good game review.
1:32 - That may be a problem for you and some other people, but that's what makes the reviews entertaining. Most people who watch the reviews like them for the foul language and vulgar actions.
1:46 - You should've mentioned that when you were talking about how some game reviewers don't use a script or write down any notes for their reviews.
2:00 - There's a difference between video game reviewers and radio/television announcers. When video game reviewers make pauses and say "uhh" and "umm", they can edit those out using programs like Windows Movie Maker. Announcers on TV or the radio have to be professionals; they are hired to talk without any stammering and pausing.
2:20 - Again, you're describing a Let's Play. Please, refer to my explanation of the differences between a Let's Play and a video game review, because I'm not going to explain it again.
2:40 - Well, people do have the right to use foul language in their videos, even video game reviewers. Sure, the words are inappropriate, but they are one of the things that make the reviews enjoyable.
3:00 - Actually, using that kind of language can make you sound less intelligent and not funny if you overuse it. If a swear word is said after about every one, two, or three words, then that will make a person sound less intelligent and not funny. A review with swear words used in it can be funny if the swear words are all used at the right times of that review.
3:05 - In other words, "F*ck", "Ass", and "Sh*t".
3:19 - Why would you feel that way? Just because people like to use words like those doesn't mean that they are devoted to them like they're Presidents or Prime Ministers.
3:51 - When a child is on the Internet, it is their parent's responsibility to monitor what that child is doing on there. There are places on the Internet that are made for children, but places that have swearing in them are not made for children. Also, if a child is heard using that kind of language that they heard from a video game review, then the parent has to have a talk with that child; they must explain what the swear words mean, tell them why it's wrong for the child to say them, and tell them not to use them again.
3:56 - Who punishes their children that way today?
4:02 - Some children are smart enough not to repeat any swear words they hear from those video game reviewers, whether those swear words sound cool to them or not.
4:06 - Video game reviewers do not make their videos to set a good example for children; they made their videos to entertain people who are old enough for them to enjoy. These videos are not intended for children anyway.
4:18 - Video game reviewers do not make their videos to encourage children to swear like them, either. They do not say anything like what you just presented here in their videos, just so you know.
4:36 - Maybe swearing and performing vulgar actions in a video game review are unnecessary and boring to you, but many other people found it entertaining. If you don't like what video game reviewers do in their videos, that's fine, but don't tell them not to add bad language and vulgar actions to their videos. They can use bad language and vulgar actions in their reviews if they want.
4:50 - There are two things that I have to correct you on Doug Walker. 1: Doug Walker is known as the Nostalgia Critic, not That Guy with the Glasses. That Guy with the Glasses is, or was, Doug Walker's website. 2: What Doug Walker does as the Nostalgia Critic is review movies and TV shows. He once did a Let's Play on The Simpsons: Bart's Nightmare, but other than that, his webseries is not about video games.
5:06 - No, I don't think these reviewers are going to revise their reviews so that the bad language and vulgar actions are no longer present in them. And even if they did, they will end up losing more fans instead of getting more fans.
5:28 - The first two places you've mentioned there are just channels on YouTube, and there's swearing that goes on a lot on YouTube. Not just in the videos, but in the comments for the videos, as well.
5:44 - Everyone who has watched those videos from those reviewers and stuck around to see more from them, of course.
5:52 - And they still have that info stuck with them. It's just that when they swear, shout, and perform inappropriate actions over a video game, they are just acting. They are not being for real.
6:03 - You just complained about the way they acted in their reviews. You've complained about them swearing and performing vulgar actions in their work. You should really have no problem with those if you really like their work.
6:32 - That's because in James Rolfe's movie reviews, he is speaking as himself, whereas in his Angry Video Game Nerd reviews, he is acting, playing the role of the title character in that webseries.
6:41 - If that kind of language is not included, then it wouldn't be an R-rated website. That kind of language is the reason why that place is an R-rated website.
6:48 - Gridiron Gang is rated PG-13, not R. I know you corrected yourself in the annotation on that video, but annotations do not make the errors in your videos go away. You should've looked your videos over before you uploaded them on YouTube.
7:08 - These reviewers have used their intellect and talent when making their reviews. It's you who haven't been using those when making your Rant-A-Wreck videos. And these reviewers have their reviews intended for adults, probably because they don't want to have them intended for 12 to 15-year-olds. So, swearing and performing vulgar actions were added in those videos by those reviewers, and this is when you and some other people who act the same way you did on a subject like this should realize that there are many videos on the Internet that are not intended for children. Actually, a site like YouTube has a lot of swearing in not just many of the videos there, but also many of the comments for those videos. Each video is intended for someone of a specific age group; you can't expect every single video appropriate for people of all ages.
7:17 - I doubt that anyone who has watched this video enjoyed it. I certainly didn't. And I'm not even gonna bother going through the end credits, so I'll just stop the video right here. Now, I like watching reviews, particularly those done by James Rolfe as the Angry Video Game Nerd. I enjoy reviews done by Doug Walker as the Nostalgia Critic, as well, but the subject on this video is video game reviews. I think those reviews are great, even with the swearing and vulgar actions. There are some people like Guptill89 who doesn't like those things added to the reviews, and that's fine if they don't. But what's not fine is when these people explain why reviewers shouldn't swear or perform vulgar actions in their reviews, even if the people doing reviews are acting. I don't know if this guy will make another video rant, but if he decides to make another one of these, then I would suggest two things:
1. Make rants about things that actually matter and not small, minor things that aren't worth complaining about, like swearing in video game reviews, minor changes in logos, and evolution in technology. 2. Look over the videos very carefully when they're completed before uploading them and not use annotations to cover up any mistakes; the mistakes will still be there, and people who watch these videos can turn the annotations off anytime and not catch your corrections.
Well, that's it for this commentary. In the words of a person formerly known as KingdomKey10: No matter how old or new a video is, the eye will find you. Have a good day, everyone.
|
|
|
Post by babclayman on Jan 27, 2015 6:53:12 GMT -5
I know that Linkra doesn' use any of the big curs, in his reviews. Some evn messge him, showing anger that he doesn', but he explains that; he feels he needs to show that one can be amusing, withot having to swear, but also claims that doesn' mean he's 'More Intellignt than reviewers who do.
You notice that, Flo?
|
|
|
Post by Flowgli on Jan 27, 2015 8:39:51 GMT -5
I never heard of Linkara. I will say that each reviewer has their own way of doing their reviews, and they are talented in their own way. To be honest, I really don't care if a review doesn't contain any swear words or not. It's just nice to know that there are people on the Internet who are giving their own opinions on video games and other things.
|
|
|
Post by babclayman on Jan 27, 2015 8:56:56 GMT -5
Linkara has Co-Op Reviews with NC, sometimes. He usually reviews Comics on the Channel. He did; Superman IV, the Uwe Boll Films and Str Trek; Insurrection?
Know who I mean?
|
|
|
Post by Flowgli on Jan 27, 2015 9:01:43 GMT -5
Okay. I'll have to check out Linkara's work later.
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Feb 2, 2015 19:46:42 GMT -5
Hey guys! Belchic here with another commentary.
Say, remember when I did a 2nd-degree commentary on SchwartzMudkip's commentary on BenTheLooney's Top 10 Animated Women? Well, that video's not up anymore; I guess Schwartz learned her lesson. However, that's not to say that Ben has some faults too.
Today, I'm going to be taking a look at Ben's Top 11 Least Favorite Disney Animated Features. Now, I understand everyone has their own opinions, but Ben's list from my perspective does raise a few brows. He's kind of hard to commentate on since he says what he wants to say along with other text popping up in that MovieMaker text, so I'll do my best to decipher both ends if I feel there is something to commentate on. So without further ado...
*plays PAW Patrol clip* Zuma: Let's dive in!
0:09 - Because it certainly isn't anymore today. No, Sir.
0:20 - I guess you don't need to show us those scars. Believe me, I know about Pixar fanbrats.
0:31 - You just gave people a reason to mail you "The Dip". Also, you're not a cartoon character; you're a regular human being just like everyone else.
0:40 - Okay, those all make sense, but let me warn you: like Pixar, Marvel has fanboys too.
0:59 - They bounced back with several good animated films.
1:13 - They have had some failures in animation, but even I found some good stuff about some of them. Though there are a couple I love nothing about. Maybe we'll see those pop up in your list.
1:34 - Mmm...I wouldn't say that.
2:28 - I will give you that. There are also bugs, poisonous plants, maybe some deadly gasses, but I still think this movie had plenty of conflict.
2:48 - Did you pronounce the former's last name correctly?
3:18 - You forgot to mention King Louie is voiced by jazz legend, Louis Prima.
3:44 - Walt actually wanted the Beatles to voice the vultures originally, but John Lennon refused to do it (which is weird because you'd think Paul McCartney would be the one to do that).
4:01 - *shows clip from Nostalgia Critic's "Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog" review* NC: ...WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA?
4:17 - Wow. You are a sick son of a b!tch!
4:25 - Boring? This movie is anything but boring! Unlike most movies I've seen, this one makes every minute count!
4:38 - So apparently you want to see this movie as a crossover with Stargate and Doctor Who? Also, stop being a d!ck!
4:59 - I have never once met anyone who desperately wants a Dalmatian fur coat.
5:18 - I fail to see the connection.
5:49 - Now I know why so many people hate this movie and would rather watch "Aladdin".
6:01 - Something tells me Ben is an animal-hater.
6:46 - You actually thought that as a kid?
7:10 - You know, hearing you try to force anti-profanity is kind of annoying. Guptail89 must really love you.
7:24 - Oh, check it out! It's my reaction to the "Pound Puppies" episode, "Hail to the Chief"!
7:47 - I agree with you there!
7:56 - Better yet, why don't you ask them to do something more important like school work or looking for a job? That's what people who spend too much time online should be doing instead of looking for subliminal messages in Disney movies or stalking other people on the Internet they have no business with! I often wonder if those said people do have productive lives outside of their Internet lives.
8:22 - Rip-off ranters are so annoying! They always find the smallest excuses to call something a rip-off and act like its the end of the world!
8:28 - I doubt there are many people who have even heard of that movie!
9:19 - Yes, Stitch is supposed to be the show-stealer.
9:56 - You're right. There are only three people in the world who don't like this movie. You being one of them. Confused Matthew is another one, and I just so happen to know the third person is Mr. babclayman1, someone who seems to love the Dalmatians I think more than me! That was a compliment, by the way, bab.
10:22 - Great, that's just what we need: another Aladdin fanboy. Why do so many Disney fans praise that movie like its the Crown Jewels of Disney?
10:32 - You seriously need to get a new microphone.
10:43 - And how is that a bad thing?
10:48 - First of all, Elton John's music doesn't suck, and Disney used Alan Menken way too much in their movies. Second of all, last time I checked, everyone seems to hate Matthew Broderick in everything he's done except for "Ferris Bueller".
11:22 - While I agree those are the two best songs in the movie, the others are not that horrible. "Can You Feel the Love Tonight" doesn't sound like Tiny Tim. Also...I hope you're ready because I'm pretty sure everyone watching this video is determined to bomb your house! (Fanboys seriously love to exaggerate.)
12:04 - Good to see someone else acknowledged that.
12:20 - Well, at least you found some ways to compromise this film, unlike Confused Matthew who was being a total d!ck about it! babclayman at least tried to be fair, even though his thoughts are similar to Matthew's.
12:43 - This oughta be good!
12:46 - Now we're talking! I'm surprised this isn't #1!
13:25 - The thing is there actually is a 1943 Disney short about Chicken Little. I've seen it myself. It's on YouTube, for crying out loud!
13:43 - Examples?
14:08 - *sigh* So much hatred towards the Buddies movies! Cut me a break! I seriously don't know a single person in the world who loves those films, so I must be alone in the world.
14:25 - I do wonder why Disney is doing that these days. A lot of movies they are releasing on Blu-Ray are coming pre-packaged with their lesser-good sequels.
15:26 - Length does not determine the quality of a movie!
15:53 - The reason they reused that segment is because it was the original's most popular segment, and they wanted to have it in there as a throwback to the original. There's nothing wrong with that.
16:14 - I can understand you disliking the celebrity scenes. Those were a little unnecessary. Although, Steve Martin actually has a lot of connections with Disney; in fact, his first job was at Disneyland when the park was still fresh, so that counts as something!
16:45 - I will agree that the animation was pretty inconsistent, but some of the segments were still good. The "Rhapsody in Blue" segment was probably the most expensive one to do, even though I still don't think it screams "Fantasia".
16:53 - Godzilla 2000, Pokemon 2000, and let's not forget Escape 2000!
17:51 - Would you please stop referencing Pixar? I'm having a hard time getting the connections!
18:02 - Tell that to the people who prefer Genesis when Peter Gabriel was the frontman!
18:33 - There aren't that many Phil Collins songs in the movie! This is nothing like the Tom & Jerry movie!
18:56 - There was a lack of commercialism in this movie.
19:10 - Lex Luthor: WROOOOOONNNNGG! Oliver starts out as a stray in the movie! Get your facts straight!
19:20 - I can't believe it either. Shouldn't you have the DVD? Then again, about 90% of the people I know still use VCR's to tape shows because they don't have DVR's.
19:24 - To be more precise, dogs!
19:30 - Do I seriously need to make a drinking game out of this? How many times has he referenced Pixar in this video now?
19:57 - That's probably one of the things that makes this movie so forgettable. The songs make it feel extremely dated.
20:04 - There's five!
20:41 - ...Umm...I got nothing on that one.
20:47 - *plays the "Price is Right" failing horn*
20:58 - I don't think very many people have seen this movie, especially the kids of this generation.
21:48 - If anything, the movie is more depressing than it is boring.
22:06 - It's still based around a living thing: the girl!
22:42 - I should've seen this one coming!
23:07 - You already did.
23:16 - Thomas O'Malley, Duchess, Marie, Berlioz, Toulouse, Georges, Scat Cat, Uncle Waldo, Roguefert, Frous Frous, Edgar, Napoleon, Lafiette. There, I just named 13!
24:09 - Robin Hood is indeed a better film than The Aristocats, but it didn't save the studio by any means. I mean look at what came out after that!
24:15 - I said the same thing about "Dinosaur", which I'm surprised didn't make this list!
24:23 - I can't decide if I like this analogy better or Trey_Vore's.
24:57 - And I'm gonna end the video right here because it's just end credits here.
Final verdict: I respect Ben's opinions, but I feel he's being too harsh on some of these movies, he needs to do some better research on his movies, and he needs to stop referencing Pixar all the time (those need to be used in moderation). Also, the randomly-placed MovieMaker text gets annoying to see while you're talking; at least have one or the other.
That's all I gotta say on the matter. See you guys next time.
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Apr 12, 2015 15:33:20 GMT -5
Hey everyone. Belchic here with another commentary.
A while ago, I made a commentary on a poor excuse for a YouTube Poop. Well, today, I'm going to be looking at another one of these. I don't think this kid exists on YouTube anymore, but this poop has been reuploaded a couple times. It shows a perfect example of how not to make a YouTube Poop as many of the no-no's mentioned by MoBrosStudios and Stuart K. Reily are present. The latter of which already made fun of this poop back in 2011, and BigEyesLuigi already made a sin count response to it, but I feel I should share my opinions on it. So without further ado...
*shows clip from "PAW Patrol"* Zuma: Let's dive in!
0:03 - Okay, from the word, "Go", there are several things wrong with this video: First of all, the sh*tty title card, not funny. That was just something quickly done up in MS Paint. Yes, I know, I've used MS Paint before in my poops, but at least I try to make it look clean. Second, recording your own voice. Third, the quality is so bad I can't understand him. Fourth, "When then there's smoke"? Fifth, how old is this kid? Eight? Nine? He's definitely not old enough to enjoy YTP humor.
0:10 - Okay, now we're getting a piss-poor quality screenshot and low-quality audio. Is he using a soundboard?
0:13 - Why are you showing a screenshot of that Zelda? Doesn't he even know she is in the CDi games?
0:18 - And there's more reused stuff and dragging out dead silence.
0:21 - Erm, that's Zelda, not Gannon.
0:25 - And more sh*tty MS Paint work?
0:30 - WTF? Does this kid even know downloaders and video editors exist?
0:36 - And more use of his own voice. That wasn't even funny.
0:46 - Okay, I have no idea what's going on here. Now he's showing a video of him (at least I think it's him)...um...standing on a turn table? And again, the audio is in piss-poor quality. Even the video is in piss-poor quality. Not only does this guy have a bad microphone but he has a bad webcam too! By the way, webcams are also a big no-no when it comes to YTP.
0:55 - Really? You couldn't find any gunshot sounds?
1:00 - Wow. More sh*tty MS Paint work. Why am I not surprised?
Final verdict: This is another reason why little kids shouldn't be on YouTube. This kid wasn't even trying. This is not a YouTube Poop. It's more like a third grade school project. Leave YouTube Pooping to the professional editors, because poopers and fans of poopers laugh at stuff like this, and not in a good way!
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Apr 26, 2015 12:21:44 GMT -5
Hey guys! Belchic here with another commentary.
Well, back in October, I did a commentary on a PAW Patrol toy review by ToyReviewsForYou. In all honesty, I actually do like her channel. Sarah does do some fun reviews. This is going to be a commentary on another one of her PAW Patrol toy reviews. I'm not going to be as harsh on this one, since it wasn't as immature and unloyal as the last one. Though I still think it is in need of a commentary. So without further ado...
*plays PAW Patrol clip* Zuma: Let's dive in!
0:20 - Something tells me you haven't opened it yet.
0:31 - *plays clip from "Toy Story" Mr. Potato Head: Ages 3 and up! It's on my box! Ages 3 and up! I'm not supposed to be babysitting Princess Drool!
0:43 - And of course, I happened to watch that video, and the game is basically the game, Puppy Racers, but with a PAW Patrol theme to it. Of course, that's what I first suspected before that video came out. Heck, even the box cover art looks similar!
0:56 - Is Michael's still in business?
1:00 - Wow. That's kind of expensive for a toy like that.
1:20 - If I'm not mistaken, that's how Popples used to work. Check my facts.
1:41 - Must resist Nostalgia Critic reference!
1:55 - Just be thankful you won't have to worry about suffocating him!
2:03 - Then I suggest you go onto Google and do some research! Maybe they do have the other pups.
2:11 - You made that? Awesome job! I didn't even know Play-Dough came in those colors!
2:27 - I'll bet there are lots of kids who would love to get that in their Easter baskets!
2:42 - To anyone who wants to buy this, I recommend Toys R Us because Wal-Mart is like the McAfee equivalent of places to shop!
2:48 - Thank you for that stunning report, Captain Obvious.
3:22 - Sarah, are you pulling off a Marc Summers?
3:30 - Yeah, because the previous one wore a helmet, so you couldn't tell it was Ryder. Though this one looks a little chubbier than the Ryder on the show.
3:37 - Ehhhyuhhh...I'm not touching that one!
3:48 - Right now, I can only think of flag poles. Don't ask.
4:17 - I think I have the Rescue Marshall plush.
4:39 - I don't think that's been introduced in the show as of yet.
5:30 - You can say that again! Guess it left you speechless!
6:00 - Well, final verdict: It doesn't look like Sarah has changed all that much, but at least this video didn't piss me off as much as the previous one.
That's all the time I have for today. See you all next time.
|
|
|
Post by Flowgli on May 28, 2015 14:50:22 GMT -5
Here I am with another commentary. This commentary is going to be done on Duane Skip McAllen, known on the Internet as SAILORMOONRED1. He is another manchild who is infamous on the Internet, and he made thousands of videos, all of which feature him using dolls and action figures--particularly Sailor Moon dolls--whether he plays with them or makes them speak up for him so he doesn't speak up for himself as himself when he talks to the people who watched his videos, ranted on him, or made commentaries on his videos. And many of his videos have been commentated on by many other people. Also, for the first time ever in this topic, I'm commentating on a video that was NOT uploaded years ago. In this video, he uses Sailor Moon and Sailor Mars dolls to explain to his viewers why he burps in his videos. Let's watch.
0:03 - And there's a burp in this video, now. You should've had that edited out, but knowing you, you're just gonna leave the video unedited because you claim that editing a video makes it messed up or unrealistic.
0:21 - I'm not accepting your apology on that. Refer to what I just said to you about it. Also, you should've had those dolls prepared before you started making this video. Don't spend the first twenty seconds of a video preparing those dolls.
0:35 - Yep, this is one of the many videos in which he uses dolls and speaks in third-person perspective so it sounds as if the dolls are doing all the speaking. And when he does this, he uses the same bland, monotonous voice of his for every character he uses and does not change his voice to make these characters sound different. I'm sorry, Duane, but if you want people watching your videos to take you seriously, then you shouldn't be using dolls, as that just makes you childish.
0:46 - Well, whether you know why you burp in your videos or not, you should know to edit all the burps our or at least do retakes so that they're not in them.
0:50 - People actually can control their burps. If they feel some gas that needs to come out of their mouths, they must know to cover their mouths first so that they're not loud enough to be heard by other people.
1:01 - Yes, it can. People control it by covering their mouths before they burp so that they're quiet enough to not be heard by other people, like I said. Even if you apologized to your viewers for the burps you did in your videos, those burps are still there, and they are loud enough for other people to not only hear them, but also react to them.
1:08 - Why are you even saying what? "Sailor Moon said"? That's an appropriate question to ask yourself, because when you use these characters to have them speak up for you, you make them say their name and make them say either the word "says" or the word "said" right after that in the middle of a sentence. You make them say, "Sailor Moon said", "Sailor Mars says", and so on. When you do this, it doesn't sound like they are speaking in character. So, I take it you finally realize that making a character say "Sailor Moon says" or anything to that effect is absolutely unnecessary and sounds stupid and out of character?
1:12 - Okay, by that, you actually have come to that realization. Good to hear, then.
1:21 - I wouldn't call sneezing a "gimmick" in a video, because back when you were sneezing in your videos, those sneezes were unintentional, weren't they? And you didn't want your viewers to hear them, did you? When making the videos, you only want your viewers to hear your points on certain topics, right?
1:39 - Most people who have heard of you and talked about you referred to you as SAILORMOONRED1, and they're still referring to you as that to this day, regardless of your many channels on YouTube. But I am going to refer to you as Duane in this commentary. And stop calling sneezing a "gimmick". A gimmick is some kind of trick that is intended to attract attention or publicity, and clearly, you sneezing in your videos is nothing like that. You burping in your videos is nothing like that, either.
1:56 - And if people see this video and say that you need to edit out those burps, they'd be right, because you really need to edit them out.
2:04 - Windows Movie Maker is not the only program that can be used for video editing. I'm sure there are other programs that you can use to edit out the unnecessary stuff from your videos.
2:14 - I don't know anything about the program you just mentioned there, so I'm not gonna comment on that.
2:42 - If you don't edit out the unnecessary stuff from your videos, then people are not gonna be interested in watching those videos. When people watch your videos, they want to hear you make points on certain topics, not burp or sneeze.
2:52 - Now, you're making the dolls talk to each other on who speaks next?
2:55 - Apologizing for the burps is not the only thing you can do. If you are unable to do any editing on your videos, then you should at least do retakes.
3:04 - Yes, apologizing is good, but in some cases, it doesn't help much, and apologizing alone is not good enough when it comes to the unnecessary stuff in your videos.
3:14 - You're right. There isn't. But you must still know to control the noises coming from your body and make sure they're not there so your viewers won't comment about them in your videos.
3:24 - Nobody is going to claim that a video is inappropriate just because it has burps, sneezes, and anything like that in it.
3:46 - Okay, sometimes, when a sneeze or a burp comes out, it does so when someone doesn't feel it coming at all. That still doesn't excuse you to leave any of that in the video when it happens. You can still do retakes. Sneezes and burps can be done on purpose by having them forced.
4:06 - But if you don't care what other people say about you burping in your videos, then you should take what they said into consideration and not make a video in which you respond to it. I don't think making a video in which you explain to your viewers why you burp in your videos is going to help matters.
4:16 - Stop calling burping in a video a gimmick! I just explained what a gimmick really is, and you should refer to that explanation I gave earlier, because I am not repeating myself. Man, by saying exactly those last five words, I really am starting to sound like this one other member on YouTube who is formerly known as KingdomKey10, am I? I mean, that guy did say "I am not repeating myself" a lot in his commentaries.
4:25 - It doesn't matter if you made the choice to burp in your videos or not. Your viewers are not gonna be interested in hearing you burp in them.
4:34 - And the video ends with another burp from Duane, and I feel that he did that on purpose. Well, what can I say? This guy is an adult male who uses Sailor Moon dolls for his videos and doesn't do much to make his videos interesting. He has made thousands of videos in his account, and they're all pretty much the same thing; they're all pretty much of him playing with dolls and action figures, and using them to speak up for him to the people who ranted or commentated on him. If he's gonna make videos in which he speaks to his viewers and he wants them to take him seriously, then he should speak as himself and not use dolls. It's really immature for an adult male--an adult male, mind you--to make videos in which he plays with dolls and uses them to speak up for him, and dolls like those are made to be played with by little girls. This guy also needs to make his videos in a way that his burping is not present. Also, looking at some other videos of his and the many commentaries done on him, it looks as if all those videos of his are all done in one take, because I believe they really are. Not only does he use dolls, burp, and sneeze in his videos, but he also repeats himself a lot and take long pauses in them. Sometimes, he starts making his videos unprepared, and there are videos in which he said some words incorrectly or trip over his words, which is why it's important that he not only do some editing or do retakes, but also write down everything he is going to say in his videos. It has been said that this guy has brain damage, and that's why I tried my best to be civilized when doing this commentary, but just because he has brain damage doesn't mean he should be excused for making videos the way he does. This guy having brain damage doesn't mean people can't criticize him, rant on him, or commentate on him, either.
This video was uploaded one month ago, so it's refreshing to do a commentary on a video that wasn't uploaded too long ago. As long as I keep looking for videos to commentate on that were not uploaded too long ago, I'm good with doing commentaries whenever I can.
|
|
|
Post by Two-Tone on May 28, 2015 16:31:58 GMT -5
I have heard a lot about ChisChan, but never knew exactly what he was like. I thought at first he was a retard, which would have made it uncool to pick on him. But I listened to him carefully, and he's actually a stalker troll, it sounds like. Belchic - oh there's a lot about Chris Chan you might not wanna know about, search his name on Encyclopedia Dramatica if you are interested, but be warned of the horrors you'll find there.
|
|