|
|
Post by Two-Tone on Jul 26, 2012 19:04:50 GMT -5
nice photoshop job 101Army
also one other thing about 101 Dalmatians 2 is that they never dipped into the rest of the franchise for fan favorite pups like Cadpig, Two-Tone, Jewel, Dipstick, and Wizzer though granted the movie followed the animated movie's storyline but they could have added those pups too
|
|
|
|
Post by Snivinerior on Jul 26, 2012 23:23:15 GMT -5
hahaha, you crack me up 101Army. You really have a sense of humor. Anyway, like TT said, nice job on the fix you made in the pic.
Ok, about the pups color of their ears issue: Maybe the original writers or storyboard artists forgot that hardcore fans see every single detail about the appearance or personality or whatsoever of the characters they adore. And 1951 is a long time before the films official sequel at 2003. 53 years? I think most of the creators of the film had passed away or forgot about certain details: Lucky's ears are black, Patch's patch on his eye is at the opposite of his black ear and so on. So they "assumed" or simply created their own interpretation of the pups appearances...
One last thing, about the sequels storyline. Well, let's compare it to the series. As we know, Patch and Penny were also included in the original line-up of the main characters of the series but Disney feared about having too much main chars and dropped them leaving to three: Lucky, Cadpig and Rolly. So in the sequel, they made one pup to have the spotlight to make the story more simpler. And I think Disney is not being creative and not emphasizing all the fan favorites because they fear about having more stars means more work or so...
Well, that's what I think about the said issues.
|
|
|
|
Post by babclayman on Jul 27, 2012 9:56:53 GMT -5
Well, Like you mentioned TT, those Pups were not really from the "Animated Movie" verse, so they would have stood out.
Also, It's a Movie about Patch and I don't think it would matter to the plot if we gave the Pups outside of Patch, Lucky, Rolly, Penny & Freckles names.
And like I said before, I think the element of white ears was so Patch would stand out more and it's not really as bad as say...Having the Titanic Sunk because an Octopus threw the Ice Berg in it's path, right?
|
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Jul 27, 2012 10:54:54 GMT -5
What does the Titanic and an octopus have to do with 101D?
|
|
|
|
Post by babclayman on Jul 27, 2012 11:06:55 GMT -5
I was making a comparison.
In "Legend Of Titanic" (the other one NC did), They say the Titanic was sunk because an evil whaler got an Octopus to throw an Ice Berg at the ship. That is a movie I can see people getting angry over.
My point was, some treat the "Their Ears are white" thing as "Betrayal!" when really, it's not a big a problem.
What "Legend of Titanic" did to the Titanic story IS A problem.
It's just an analogy. Understand now?
|
|
|
|
Post by hunterhelloXD on Mar 17, 2013 4:28:54 GMT -5
as amazing as it is belchic. i would like to make the plot focusing on 2 pups (yeah it maybe unfair to the other pups but some funs i know like this kind of plot) the 2 pups that are being focused (sorry wrong grammmar) are lucky and patch now we all know that both of them has a small rivalry so i think disney should intensify it to make great movie out of it |
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Mar 17, 2013 12:06:10 GMT -5
as amazing as it is belchic. i would like to make the plot focusing on 2 pups (yeah it maybe unfair to the other pups but some funs i know like this kind of plot) the 2 pups that are being focused (sorry wrong grammmar) are lucky and patch now we all know that both of them has a small rivalry so i think disney should intensify it to make great movie out of it Okay. Who are you? And when did I say that? No offense to anyone, but a lot of your guys' ideas are stuff that I would not recommend. First of all, yes, having it focus on only two characters is a bit unfair. If they do that, it might as well be a spin-off. Also, how is a rivalry between two pups going to make this an amazing Disney story? The one idea that you guys are constantly giving me that I totally disagree with is getting rid of Cruella. I mean, seriously, are you out of your mind? Like I said, I know she's a royal pain, but come on! Cruella is the most popular character in the whole franchise! Fans would be outraged if she wasn't included in this movie! If I could make a comparison: Halloween III was a movie that a lot of fans of the franchise hated just because it didn't have Michael Myers, who was practically the star of the franchise. So with that in mind, are you saying that you WANT people to hate this movie? I understand that with most movie trilogies, the third one is usually the worst (the only exception being Toy Story 3, which everyone is calling the Citizen Kane of animated movies), but that doesn't mean it has to be the case for everything. |
|
|
|
Post by babclayman on Mar 19, 2013 11:17:28 GMT -5
Belchic does have a good point of Inclueding Cruella. If ever there's any "101 Dalmatians" mention, Nine times out of Ten, it's often mentioning Cruella.
I mean, even in 'Starlight Barking', whilst Cruella wasn't a central focus and probably only appeared in one chapter, Dodie Smith did feel like she needed to inclued Cruella.
Although, I don't mind if Lucky & Patch are focus in a Third Addition. They have been shown to have a bit of a Nice Rivalry in the "Animated Films", such as the "Patch pushed me in the soot! Lucky pushed me first!"
Although, If you wish for More Pups to play a role, that can help. Like Supporting Dals or Secondary Characters too, right?
Although, Disney have been making Lucky & Freckles the duo for Dal adventures recently, on Disney Junior, haven't they?
If they did make a Third Part, would they be given their British type accents like in "Patch's London Adventure"?
|
|
|
|
Post by Two-Tone on Aug 7, 2013 0:11:39 GMT -5
speaking of those dal adventures I've never seen them on Disney Junior as of late (then again I only watch it when 101 Dalmatians the series is on)
|
|
|
|
Post by Trey_Vore on Oct 3, 2013 3:02:06 GMT -5
There may be something coming guys. Do you guys know how Julia Roberts and Charlize Theron played the Wicked Queen in Snow White spin-offs Mirror Mirror and Snow White and the Huntsman, and how Angelina Jolie is going to play Maleficient in her own movie? Well, they are planning on doing a movie that is centered on Cruella DeVil (no word on who will play her yet)! movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-talk/why-future-holds-many-more-cruella-vils-003211514.html |
|
|
|
Post by babclayman on Oct 3, 2013 6:11:09 GMT -5
They're making another Dalmatians Movie!? YES! YES! X3
And Glenn Close is a creative consultant? Well, I say that's a good idea. It is common view that she does play the best Cruella.
So, is Disney planning on making a Film Series out of the Disney Villains?
Showing their side of the story?
Great News on another Dalmatian Film in the works!
Will it be Animated or Live Action?
|
|
|
|
Post by Stirfry on Oct 3, 2013 8:05:22 GMT -5
They're making another Dalmatians Movie!? YES! YES! X3 And Glenn Close is a creative consultant? Well, I say that's a good idea. It is common view that she does play the best Cruella. So, is Disney planning on making a Film Series out of the Disney Villains? Showing their side of the story? Great News on another Dalmatian Film in the works! Will it be Animated or Live Action? Um... Mr. Clayman, it says in the first paragraph of the link that it will be live action. This direction is really quite disappointing for me. Not only is it live action but it centres around Cruella. Crulla is a great character but not who I want a 101 Dalmatians movie to centre around. Especially if she is portrayed the way she was in the live action movie which I feel she probably will be. |
|
|
|
Post by RaceFanX on Oct 3, 2013 10:40:58 GMT -5
Unless they still have canine heroes and/or a b*tchin' car chase I'm not really interested in a film just about Cruella. 101 is a not a franchise that would do well in this era of remakes with a more realistic slant.
|
|
|
|
Post by Belchic on Oct 3, 2013 10:51:53 GMT -5
A Cruella movie? No, no, no! This is NOT what I want! I know, it's a spin-off, but in case you guys have forgotten, I HATE spin-offs! Yeah, I know, I did say to include Cruella in the third Dalmatian movie, but I didn't say I wanted it to ONLY have Cruella! You know what? Something about this reminds me of the events that occurred in the episode, "The Making Of..."; I'm sure bab knows what I mean. And something tells me my parents are going to think in going to want to see this even though Cruella is NOT the reason I watch the Dalmatians.
|
|
|
|
Post by babclayman on Oct 3, 2013 10:54:11 GMT -5
Actually, that’s something that works with “101 Dalmatians”, since it’s one of Disney’s more contemporary films, it’s easily adaptable to fit in more modern times. Besides, not all Cinema can be considered ‘Realistic’ these days.
Just cause it may be a Spin-Off, in no way makes it bad either (and before 'anyone' tries calling Hypocrite on me, There are reasons why I find 'Equestria Girls' doesn't work and I do like some Spin-Off Shows. Fraiser for one).
I’m sure they’ll find a way to make it good, right? ;3
|
|
