|
Cadpig
Nov 4, 2007 0:33:02 GMT -5
Post by setzer on Nov 4, 2007 0:33:02 GMT -5
That's a statement of prespective. Maybe it was you who missed MY point. I don't think this needs to be elaborated on, but if I must... Here's the equivalence: Slamming a Simpsons character = Slamming Spider-Man or Optimus Prime The Simpsons can take a hit and still be just fine. Why do you constantly hear people make jokes about the French or the Australians? They can take a hit and be perfectly fine. Slamming a Brandy and Mr. Whiskers character = Slamming Scrappy-Doo or Jar Jar Binks Brandy and Mr. Whiskers ain't NEARLY as loved a series. Why don't you trash talk Indians or go to Germany and make a Third Reich joke? It's basically "Don't go there". In short: Slamming Lisa Simpson is okay. Slamming Brandy Harrington is not okay. Dude, all I said was that Lisa is my favorite character on The Simpsons. You were the one who went on some god-forsaken crusade to prove your point. But you didn’t really prove anything. Do I care about what the public thinks? Should I give a **** if people think Lisa is an annoying character? I think she’s a great character and that’s all that really matters, but I still think it’s rather hypocritical of you to say Lisa and Brandy are completely different when they both share many of the same flaws. It doesn’t matter that one show is popular while the other show isn’t; we’re talking about the personality traits of the characters, not the success of the show they appear in. Therefore, you should judge both Brandy and Lisa equally, yet you have refused to do so. I’m growing weary of this. Each character should be judged equally, yet you’ve admitted your bias in favor of Brandy. I’m beginning to wonder if the only reason you support Brandy is because you think she’s hot. With that out of the way, I’m going to actually add to the real purpose of this thread… Do you believe Cadpig would have been as great of a character if she had a different voice actress?Personally, I don’t believe she would have been. Don’t get me wrong, the writers did a great job at establishing her personality and giving her great lines in the script, but I fervently believe that Kath Soucie really made the character come together. Without her impeccable voice-work throughout the series, I don’t believe I’d be as big of a Cadpig fan that I currently am.
|
|
|
Cadpig
Nov 4, 2007 0:58:47 GMT -5
Post by Belchic on Nov 4, 2007 0:58:47 GMT -5
With that out of the way, I’m going to actually add to the real purpose of this thread… Do you believe Cadpig would have been as great of a character if she had a different voice actress?Personally, I don’t believe she would have been. Don’t get me wrong, the writers did a great job at establishing her personality and giving her great lines in the script, but I fervently believe that Kath Soucie really made the character come together. Without her impeccable voice-work throughout the series, I don’t believe I’d be as big of a Cadpig fan that I currently am. You are so right, Huntsman! Kath Soucie really made Cadpig the little puppy we've all grown up loving all these years! I don't think anyone else could have given Cadpig that cute little voice other than Kath Soucie! (Does anyone know how to pronounce that last name?)
|
|
|
Cadpig
Nov 4, 2007 1:03:02 GMT -5
Post by Two-Tone on Nov 4, 2007 1:03:02 GMT -5
That is true
a funfact Kath Soucie originally did Bubbles' voice on the Powerpuff Girls back when the girls were in the What-A-Cartoon show before they made it to their own series when Tara Strong took over as Bubbles
|
|
|
Cadpig
Nov 4, 2007 1:06:28 GMT -5
Post by Trey_Vore on Nov 4, 2007 1:06:28 GMT -5
Dude, all I said was that Lisa is my favorite character on The Simpsons. You were the one who went on some god-forsaken crusade to prove your point. But you didn’t really prove anything. Do I care about what the public thinks? Should I give a **** if people think Lisa is an annoying character? I think she’s a great character and that’s all that really matters, but I still think it’s rather hypocritical of you to say Lisa and Brandy are completely different when they both share many of the same flaws. It doesn’t matter that one show is popular while the other show isn’t; we’re talking about the personality traits of the characters, not the success of the show they appear in. Therefore, you should judge both Brandy and Lisa equally, yet you have refused to do so. Is that right? Are you the same person who started a holy crusade against sip's picture of Cadpig with cum dripping out of her mouth? Who started a thread that went on for like 20 pages? Wishing you could "completely dismantle that XXX Puppy Farm site"? Who gave this impression that he wanted to go so far as to pass a law that all fanart is to be G-rated and any and all adult artists get penalized under torture? So who's being hypocritical now?
|
|
|
Cadpig
Nov 4, 2007 2:32:27 GMT -5
Post by setzer on Nov 4, 2007 2:32:27 GMT -5
Is that right? Are you the same person who started a holy crusade against sip's picture of Cadpig with cum dripping out of her mouth? Who started a thread that went on for like 20 pages? Wishing you could "completely dismantle that XXX Puppy Farm site"? Who gave this impression that he wanted to go so far as to pass a law that all fanart is to be G-rated and any and all adult artists get penalized under torture? So who's being hypocritical now? How am I being hypocritical? Do you know what that word means, Mr. Vore? I would recommend that you check a dictionary. You are supporting Brandy Harrington and opposing Lisa Simpson despite the fact that they both share the exact same characteristics that you rallied against. You said Lisa Simpson is a perfect example of a cartoon character that you don’t like, yet Brandy Harrington is just like her, if not worse. That is being hypocritical. I got upset with sip’s signature because it violated proboard rules and offended me as a fan of Cadpig, while you got upset because I said Lisa was a good character. There is a difference, Mr. Vore.
|
|
|
Cadpig
Nov 4, 2007 3:14:52 GMT -5
Post by Trey_Vore on Nov 4, 2007 3:14:52 GMT -5
Matter of fact, I do.
You were thinking all pictures of Cadpig have to be all-age appropriate and have no sense of humor involving more mature topics. You thought you were doing good but in truth you were trying to surpress his freedom of expression. You were thinking you were being virtuous, without really being as such. And if depression really is a virtue, as you claim, I have no idea why one of your favorite characters in Lilo and Stitch: the Series happens to 625 (Reuben), despite the fact he's a happy-go-lucky character.
And this argument only went for a page, as opposed to your constant 20-page b*tching on a piece of artwork. You claim Brandy is exactly like Lisa, but in truth they have nothing in common. I don't think Brandy is a vegetarian and there's also the fact that she's much more self-centered, materialistic, lazy, abusive, etc. stuff that Lisa isn't. These are more Homer traits than Lisa traits.
And as for your point on emotion, The Simpsons goes for more real world emotion. Brandy and Mr. Whiskers' emotion is more in the vein of Cow and Chicken. It's more comedic in tone and is not supposed to be taken seriously. There's a difference.
You don't get why you think I support one character and bash another, but what I don't get is why you insist on comparing two shows that don't really have much (if anything) in common with each other.
|
|
|
Cadpig
Nov 4, 2007 3:59:15 GMT -5
Post by Riptastik on Nov 4, 2007 3:59:15 GMT -5
-Grabs a stick and some marshmallows and holds it over Treyvore and Hunstman- Hmm...hmmm...hmmm...
|
|
|
Cadpig
Nov 4, 2007 13:12:55 GMT -5
Post by setzer on Nov 4, 2007 13:12:55 GMT -5
Matter of fact, I do. You were thinking all pictures of Cadpig have to be all-age appropriate and have no sense of humor involving more mature topics. You thought you were doing good but in truth you were trying to surpress his freedom of expression. You were thinking you were being virtuous, without really being as such. Proboard rules mandate. Sparky’s rules mandate. There are no sexual images allowed on this forum, and correct me if I’m wrong, you don’t see sip actually linking to his x-rated material anymore. That was actually the main thing I was rallying against. This forum isn’t America. You don’t have freedom of speech and expression. You can’t post whatever you want. There are rules; rules that are beyond Sparky’s control. Again, Mr. Vore, what you’ve said has nothing to do with hypocrisy. And if depression really is a virtue, as you claim, I have no idea why one of your favorite characters in Lilo and Stitch: the Series happens to 625 (Reuben), despite the fact he's a happy-go-lucky character. Again, Mr. Vore, I never said I don’t like happy-go-lucky characters; I merely said that I prefer characters that actually have their fair share of ups and downs. Cadpig is pretty much an optimist as well, despite a few episodes, but she’s my favorite character of all time. Please don’t spin my words around. And this argument only went for a page, as opposed to your constant 20-page b*tching on a piece of artwork. You claim Brandy is exactly like Lisa, but in truth they have nothing in common. I don't think Brandy is a vegetarian and there's also the fact that she's much more self-centered, materialistic, lazy, abusive, etc. stuff that Lisa isn't. These are more Homer traits than Lisa traits. If you say so, Mr. Vore. I’m tired of bickering over this nonsense. You’ve already dodged the question, so there’s no point in talking about that anymore. And as for your point on emotion, The Simpsons goes for more real world emotion. Brandy and Mr. Whiskers' emotion is more in the vein of Cow and Chicken. It's more comedic in tone and is not supposed to be taken seriously. There's a difference. Emotion is still emotion. Again, Mr. Vore, it doesn’t matter what the circumstances are. You don't get why you think I support one character and bash another, but what I don't get is why you insist on comparing two shows that don't really have much (if anything) in common with each other. Because we’re talking about the content of their character, Mr. Vore. The other details do not matter.
|
|
|
Cadpig
Nov 4, 2007 13:59:18 GMT -5
Post by Riptastik on Nov 4, 2007 13:59:18 GMT -5
-turns over Marshmallow- Almost done...
|
|
|
Cadpig
Nov 4, 2007 14:10:16 GMT -5
Post by Trey_Vore on Nov 4, 2007 14:10:16 GMT -5
Proboard rules mandate. Sparky’s rules mandate. There are no sexual images allowed on this forum, and correct me if I’m wrong, you don’t see sip actually linking to his x-rated material anymore. That was actually the main thing I was rallying against. This forum isn’t America. You don’t have freedom of speech and expression. You can’t post whatever you want. There are rules; rules that are beyond Sparky’s control. Again, Mr. Vore, what you’ve said has nothing to do with hypocrisy. Check your dictionary again, what you were doing is an exact definition of hypocrisy. This is what mine says: hypocrisy: pretending to be what one is not, or to feel what one does not feel; esp., a pretense of virtue, piety, etc. Again, Mr. Vore, I never said I don’t like happy-go-lucky characters; I merely said that I prefer characters that actually have their fair share of ups and downs. Cadpig is pretty much an optimist as well, despite a few episodes, but she’s my favorite character of all time. Please don’t spin my words around. Well, I like that, and characters that are lively and entertaining. If you say so, Mr. Vore. I’m tired of bickering over this nonsense. You’ve already dodged the question, so there’s no point in talking about that anymore. No I haven't dodged it. You're getting mad because I gave my definition and you're not getting the answer you think you want. And that would be, "Oh, huh huh huh huh. I guess Bwandy and Wisa weawwy are awike! I guess I SHOULD wike Wisa after all! Huh huh huh!" And I never once said Brandy was my favorite character in my entire cartoon-loving history. So who's spinning whose words around now? Emotion is still emotion. Again, Mr. Vore, it doesn’t matter what the circumstances are. No it's not. There's a difference between the emotion in a movie like Spider-Man (deep and emotionally inflicting) and emotion in a movie like Scooby-Doo (played for comedic effect). There IS a difference; you're being a crybaby because I have my reasons and you're not getting what you want. Because we’re talking about the content of their character, Mr. Vore. The other details do not matter. Difference being I backed up my opinions using examples that speak for everyone, while you use only what you like. All I can say on that statement is, "You're on your own there".
|
|
|
Cadpig
Nov 4, 2007 14:28:13 GMT -5
Post by setzer on Nov 4, 2007 14:28:13 GMT -5
This conversation is over, Mr. Vore. Feel free to keep running your mouth, as I’m no longer listening. Does anyone know how to pronounce that last name?) I believe her name is pronounced “sue-see”, but I’m not sure about that.
|
|
|
Cadpig
Nov 4, 2007 16:52:38 GMT -5
Post by Belchic on Nov 4, 2007 16:52:38 GMT -5
*sighs of relief* Finally! Thanks, Huntsman!
|
|
|
Cadpig
Nov 5, 2007 1:38:26 GMT -5
Post by Riptastik on Nov 5, 2007 1:38:26 GMT -5
-Eats marshmallow- Yummy....
|
|
|
Cadpig
Nov 5, 2007 3:56:19 GMT -5
Post by Tic-Tac on Nov 5, 2007 3:56:19 GMT -5
-=toasts his marshmallow...but burns it=- Awww....;_;
|
|
|
Cadpig
Nov 5, 2007 4:38:11 GMT -5
Post by Two-Tone on Nov 5, 2007 4:38:11 GMT -5
*offers Shade and Tac chocolate bars and ghram crackers* make some smores?
|
|