|
Post by Sweeney Terrier on Jul 14, 2015 0:16:14 GMT -5
Here's some shows I hope he does.
Freakazoid. The Mask Animated Series Ace Ventura
I would suggest All Dogs Go to heaven the series but that one isn't as crazy as the other three despite leaving some plot holes in the overall franchise...if you call it canon but there was a 3rd film based on it so....I guess MGM did what they wanted or something.
|
|
|
Post by Sweeney Terrier on Jul 12, 2015 20:34:39 GMT -5
I'm watching the Amending Fences episode now and here are my thoughts, (I even posted them as a comment on the webpage on YouTube. With scenarios like Twilight trying to make up for lost time or apologize and redeem herself, the trick is to neither ignore it, (obviously), but don't actually try too hard or intimately with your attempts. Passionately, sure but not intimately or with full-on effort or work perhaps. Also, WHAT is she studying? No matter the topic, I'd say the concept she's 'studying' is irrelevant. It's just her 'self-defense mechanism' to put it short acting up since, seeing as how Twily didn't attend her party, (twilight being her only actual friend as a filly), made her feel a strong distrust for essentially anypony. She's doing all she can to fill her time and stay away from socializing. I should know. If I had the choice back at my previous school district, (not the one I graduated from), I'd prefer sticking to my studies or working and spending my time all alone rather than cooperate overall with a single student from that school or socialize in the slightest, despite there being a few good eggs present.
And the overall feel of the episode near the end, reminded me of the B.B.B.F.F. song from the Season 2 finale. "I had my books to read, didn't know that I would ever need, other ponies, to make my life complete."
Also, that path/trail of books is just making me think of that part from Family Guy with James Woods. "Ooh a piece of candy! Ooh, a piece of candy! Ooh a piece of candy!" Then again, nowadays when I see that kind of scene, I look back to that part. In the case of Luna's guilt, (pre-watching the latest episode), have you not read the 2nd volume to the comic series or 'watched' the Doctor Whooves Adventures series on YouTube, Bab? Outside of those, considering what she did, it makes sense for her guilt complex. Opposing her own sister, scaring her citizens uh....'manure-less' if you get my drift, and so on. Although her guilt-tripping here is quite excessive. Putting the blame on herself for ANYTHING regarding dreams or night, is far-fetched. I don't think even Oedipus feels THIS much guilt for SO DANG LONG. I just started now, and frankly, I like the idea of a dream episode, opens up so many possibilities. And besides, Fluttershy loves, loves, LOVES animals so why wouldn't she wanna be a 'pet' for a day? That, and Angel has CLEARLY shown he can be a...hoof-ful. Also, Turning Equestria into a living nightmare....wasn't that Discord's plan in S2? That's kinda what he did, just in a more Joker-like or nonsensical manner. Speaking of Discord, I think in that shared dream, Luna was channeling Discord. I take it Rarity bears that nightmare because it's to her wonderful attire that she'd hate to damage. Applejack's nightmare is simple. Frankly, I agree with Rainbow and why her nightmare is so.....TERRIBLE! (Except in my case, I think it'd be hearing "Wheels on the Bus" for hours on end.) Also, it is just me or is the Tantabus taking its time like a typical Bond villain; as in they're taking their time, and loving it.
|
|
|
Post by Sweeney Terrier on Jul 5, 2015 16:22:56 GMT -5
Oh, an example of an outtake being that one Hoedown.
"When it comes to hoedowns, I'm doin' another one. After the first one, I thought that I was done. Feel like such a fool and I feel like such a twit. This is what I have to do to please the ****ing Brit."
|
|
|
Post by Sweeney Terrier on Jul 5, 2015 16:02:22 GMT -5
I hope there's an "After" image to this one. I wonder how high the Phoenix shall rise.
|
|
|
Post by Sweeney Terrier on Jun 27, 2015 20:07:20 GMT -5
Actually it is relevant a little, since it'll be a while before Bab can see Inside-Out and in turn, see Lava, whose animation was a little odd but the song played in it was nice. I'd say my 3 favorite shorts would be, from best to worst: 1, Geri's Game 2, For the Birds 3, Knick-Knack. If there was a 4th, I would put Lava because of the story behind it and the song, (the song being the story actually), it's just...lovely. Edit: Actually, I'd put Lava at 3 just because of the lovely song, maybe even at 2, but Geri's Game is such a classic.
|
|
|
Post by Sweeney Terrier on Jun 22, 2015 21:33:11 GMT -5
Animat gives Inside Out a 10 out of 10, his only issue I recall perhaps being how Joy, unlike the other emotions, isn't quite as cartoony.
I just saw it around an hour ago and frankly I enjoyed it. Many if not several moments I thought of my own life, (the shock and discomfort of moving from a home you enjoy to one that may not be as great, (my new one certainly wasn't), to having a breakdown all that you lost, and of course...perhaps as a result of this comfort and other factors...developing an 'attitude'.. Frankly, while I know this was merely an artistic, entertaining, interpretation of one's emotions, each mind the film delved into had a bit of a theme to it, so it makes me wonder what themes inside my mind and those of others may be.
|
|
|
Post by Sweeney Terrier on Jun 14, 2015 11:16:19 GMT -5
Well, makes sense to get Ryu from Street Fighter rather than say Jin from Tekken, Siegfried from SoulCalibur, (big-ass sword), and especially any protagonist from Mortal Kombat.
|
|
|
Post by Sweeney Terrier on Jun 13, 2015 17:09:33 GMT -5
Maybe the changeling was passively feasting on the love-based atmosphere/tone of the situation. It wasn't bothering anyone but I kinda feel bad for him since, understandably, no one sat near him.
ehh....I honestly don't know on the age case of the Doctor's voice, honestly. Maybe a bit younger would be better but this Doctor was a ma-...stallion of science and logic so the aged/mature voice fits fine.
|
|
|
Post by Sweeney Terrier on Jun 13, 2015 13:37:36 GMT -5
I do like how the Doctor is done here honestly. A scientific person among...well, more philosophical folks I suppose. It's like Socrates or Aristotle among the Ancient Greeks. (Men of logic among those who look to gods and myths for the explanations to life).
And I agree with Bab. Seeing as how this is merely a celebratory episode makes sense why it's all about the background characters, including 'Derpy' and Doctor. Heck, in the comics, Volume 3 of the main comic series was about secondary characters. Namely Big Mac and Shining Armor.
And it's interesting how even a common changeling attended the wedding. Now, while the normal presumption would be to feast on the sensation of love present, it's surely for something else. Perhaps just common courtesy or so on; or to show that final message that, no matter how often the main characters are the focus of the story, it's ALWAYS the supporting cast and ensemble that builds forth a grand tale or world.
|
|
|
Post by Sweeney Terrier on Jun 13, 2015 10:37:13 GMT -5
Indeed. Granted, when I first watched the trailer there were a few details I found strange, (namely Murray's design to say the least), but I can live with it since it's sort of reminiscent of Murray's design in Sly 4. That movie would be a reason Sony isn't working on a Sly 5, and honestly...while the movie is supposedly about the first game, I don't mind that fact.
Bentley's design reminds me of some other CGI-animated movies or shows, but lesser known ones overall..excluding perhaps Monsters Inc. I guess.
|
|
|
Jeopardy!
Jun 8, 2015 23:07:12 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Sweeney Terrier on Jun 8, 2015 23:07:12 GMT -5
Who is P.L. Travers? (Aka Pamela Travers).
|
|
|
Post by Sweeney Terrier on Jun 7, 2015 3:29:39 GMT -5
Frankly, atm certain details of the 4th game are keeping me awake since I can't stop thinking about them, namely the ending and this one moment a fan would call terrible writing of the series BUT, (aside from Sony), the 4th was made by a different company than the 1st 3. The ending just leaves a few loose ends that I feel should be tied up in a fifth game but the potential solutions are multiple and it feels most of them imo are negative ones in a fan's eyes; I myself being a fan. And the question is, what could be done in the fifth game anyway? (The game wouldn't have to revolve fully on the main loose end, just tie it up at some point and maybe leave the series with none...or least no massive loose ends.)
|
|
|
Post by Sweeney Terrier on Jun 7, 2015 2:08:50 GMT -5
I'm sure few of you are console gamers and perhaps even Playstation gamers, (personally, in the 360 era I've been a 360 gamer but before then, PS2, in short I'm not entirely one myself), but after finishing Sly 4: Thieves in Time just minutes ago, (PS exclusive and always has been but I used my brother's account), and watching an apparent movie trailer for a Sly movie in 2016 by of course Sony, (film looks okay), I decided to start up this thread in the game section since Sly is a game first and just recently a film. I've played all four but only finished perhaps 1, 3, and 4. Please do Reply if you have even an opinion on the trailer or the idea of the series or characters perhaps.
|
|
|
Post by Sweeney Terrier on Jun 2, 2015 9:08:15 GMT -5
Patch/Flo asks: "If you were to make a series for this forum where you talk about something in a specific subject, just like I talk about game shows in my series and Belchic talks about commercials in his series, what would your series be about?"
My answer: Frankly I'm not exactly sure. If by series you mean one single thread, there could be various things I could talk about, (though it'd probably be certain figures of infamy or psychopaths like Bundy and Manson, and…supposed psychopaths *eyes Ed Gein* Edit: It would perhaps overall just talk about certain historical or international details. Such as, and I just a read a detail on this on Biography.com when reading about Kim Jong-il, how foreign nations, {NK, Iran, etc}, tend to have or construct facilities for nuclear resources or weapons but in the case of NK during Jong-il, the weapon construction was for security purposes, as in perhaps self-defense, but regardless they're still looked at with negativity even if other, larger and more powerful nations, (in terms of military such as US), scorn such an idea as foreign nations, {with an infamous history as if there is one without infamy}, building facilities for nuclear means…whether energy or weapons.
Question for Nemo: While this is perhaps a little personal for you, if I'm correct you have autism or a form of it. When were you diagnosed? (For me it was a year ago).
|
|
|
Post by Sweeney Terrier on Jun 1, 2015 11:37:34 GMT -5
The day's going okay. Thanks Bab and Flo-…err…Patch.
|
|